This is Radio Holger / no 60 - excerpt (2/2)
Michael Laudahn eOpposition
http://radioholger.dk/tekster/tekst60.htm
6
In a recent circular letter from Den Danske Forening [The Danish
Association] dated 25 june 2007, harassments against danish jews are
described, and it is said that these harassments apprently grow. Then a
number of examples are mentioned, and this may all be perfectly correct,
still I find it much more interesting that the jews' own organisation -
Mosaisk Trossamfund - contributes through Dansk Flygtningehjælp [Danish
Refugee Aid] to more mohammedans getting into the country, and this although
it has been proved that it is the mohammedans who are behind the harassments
against the jews. How meaningful is it if Mosaisk Trossamfund complains with
the danish authorities about assaults, if it is Mosaisk Trossamfund that
plays a major part in making these assaults possible? So my impression is,
Mosaisk Trossamfund ought to break their heads over their own organisation's
function in this matter, instead of complaining with the authorities, for
Mosaisk Trossamfund is not without a co-responsibility in this matter. It
would therefore be wise if Mosaisk Trossamfund would fight mohammedan
immigration into Denmark, instead of promoting it, for no matter what
happens, the jews are always the first who suffer when things go bad, and
they will probably know this very well themselves.
7
Pia Kjærsgaard's [chairwoman Dansk Folkeparti] new ugebrev ['weekly letter']
of monday 25 june 2007 deals with the new EU mini-contract, and as Pia
Kjærsgaard has assumed a clear position towards this contract, her ugebrev
is interesting. She says as follows: 'Don't cheat the population for a
referendum, Fogh [= Anders Fogh Rasmussen, prime minister]! So it has
happened again, that no less than 27 state and goverment heads met behind
closed doors in Brussels and reached a botch compromise with regard to
Europe's future. The most remarkable thing about the agreement on this new
contract, which no longer must be called constitution, is not that the EU
system takes even more power from the national states. No, it is rather the
way this is done. After the dutch and french clearly rejected the first
draft for a new constitution of the european union, the EU apparatus went in
black, and only now, several years later, the 27 state leaders - except the
british and the poles who continue to offer some resistance against the
constitution - have dared to try to impose it again on their populations.
Unfortunately, it looks as if this works.
8
After France and Holland had rejected the new constitution through
referenda, eurocrates sat down with a firm mandate: Write a draft for a new
constitution, but make sure that it, legally spoken, needs no referendum in
any of the member states, said the masters of the European Union. Presently,
Anders Fogh Rasmussen plays his cards carefully, in order not to annoy
anyone. My guess however is that the decision has been taken, and that the
prime minister doesn't wish to hold a referendum. The social democrates show
the same attitude, so there is no majority at the Folketing for listening to
the people. My message to the danish prime minister is very clear and
direct: Give us a referendum, Fogh! Democracy is not about the assessments
of experts to what extent sovereignty is ceded, and if this must lead to a
referendum, measured by legal logic.
9
If 70 % of the danes state in an opinion poll that they wish to have a
referendum, then every prime minister having respect for his assignment and
his people, whose interests to administer is his job, must follow such a
clear demand at short notice. The new constitution will - likewise the many
gradual previous changings and addings to the EU's cooperation - clip off
one more part of danish independence. Henceforth, Denmark wll no longer have
a permanent EU commissioner, the weight of our votes will be tiny, and the
number of danish members in the European Parliament will be about a dozen of
almost 700. The much talk about Denmark having to give up more and more
independence, in order to maintain a little influence on our own future,
reminds in a growing degree of the picture of the mouse and the elephant on
their way over a ['third-world'] suspension bridge, the mouse exclaiming
proudly: Eeh, look how we swing! During these last years, the EU has
developped towards an enormous colossus on feet of clay, who keeps on trying
to maintain the illusion that these 27 countries could enter into a close
political cooperation - despite of the countries' obvious differences in
development, understanding of democracy, attitude towards immigration,
social protection etc. My invitation to Anders Fogh Rasmussen is therefore
very clear: Listen to the people's voice and hold a referendum, where the
danes can say yes or no to giving away more self-determination to the EU.'
That was Pia Kjærgaard's ugebrev, and we can only support her invitation,
for the EU madness must be voted away.
10
It is a peculiar thing with the word 'tolerance', for although this word is
assessed clearly in a positive manner in dictionaries and lexica, it is in
practice used to cover the most criminal acts against the danish people. The
mad and country-damaging attitude of the friends of the strangers is
therefore called tolerance, in other words the correct attitude, while the
more national-minded and responsible attitude towards the strangers is
called intolerant, so the faulty attitude. But what kind of baloney is this,
for if it is proven that the strangers are an insupportable burden for the
european societies, then the correct attitude is to reject the strangers,
while the so-called tolerant attitude towards the strangers is outright
country-damaging. This is logic! That it were positive to create problems
for one's country through the acceptance of immigration, is a totally mad
thought which can only be accepted by empty brains or consciously malicious
friends of the strangers. Reasonable people do not wish to create problems
for their country, and therefore language usage would have to be turned
around, in a way that the acceptance of the strangers' damaging influence in
the country were called intolerance towards the country's own citizens,
while resistance against the strangers' presence in Denmark would have to be
called tolerance towards the country's own citizens.
11
And now questions to Radio Holger: A listener has sent a letter where he -
next to providing some information - asks a question regarding Radio
Holger's attitude towards adopted stranger children. What do you think about
them, asks the listener.
12
Regarding adopted stranger children, it has since long been clear that these
adoptions just are a part of immigration. Along with illegal immigrants,
adopted children form a kind of hidden immigration, and as this stream of
third-world adults and children goes on ad infinitum, it is clear that a
halt to immigration must also entail a halt to adoptions of stranger
children. When we talk about adopting stranger children, we can also talk
about crime, for in practice, they buy children in the third world. The
poorest strangers sell their children to danes who are just interested in
shining their glory as do-gooders. This can not be defended morally, and the
danish adopting parents are no good people, as they believe themselves, they
are rather immoral and criminal.
--
No third-world immigration to the western world! Many danes think the same,
see e g
http://www.dendanskeforening.dk/index.asp?id=27 .
Don't surrender, keep on fighting !!!
War Office
Keep fighting for the jews? Why are you defending the jews of Israel?
This is all their fault.
Go watch Peace Propaganda and The Promised Land on video-google.
Stop being a blind servant of jewish supremacy. Once they have gotten
you to rid their muslim enemies they will get rid of you too.
Michael Laudahn eOpposition
"War Office" <911fal...@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1183106541.9...@u2g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Keep fighting for the jews? Why are you defending the jews of Israel?
This is all their fault.
Go watch Peace Propaganda and The Promised Land on video-google.
Stop being a blind servant of jewish supremacy. Once they have gotten
you to rid their muslim enemies they will get rid of you too.
----------------------------------------
Isn't this rather about priorities?
War Office
<ch805...@yahoo.com.mx> wrote:
> "War Office" <911falsef...@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitragnews:1183106541.9...@u2g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
half of the information you are getting, if not 99% of it is being
pumped out of Zionist funded agencies. They are on a full blown war
rampage to destory the muslims cause the muslims are their enemies
cause the jews want to expand their desert with no water and no oil
and no nothing further into muslims territories.
You're just pedling jew propaganda. I lived with muslims everywhere in
Coburg melbourne. They are peaceful bunch - better behaved than most
aussies.