Why Has the UK Guardian Become a Mouthpiece of Invade-Iran Agitprop?
Freeman
petro-imperialist agitation that, notwithstanding the debacle of "Iraqi
WMD", "Western" (read Anglo-Saxon) "intelligence" is nonetheless
recycling for use against the next Mideast oil target.
True, they're being a bit cleverer about it this time; they aren't
saying Iran's GOT the weapons, merely that it is trying to make/get
them. That way, they won't have to explain why they can't find any
actual weapons once they've invaded.
Secret services say Iran is trying to assemble a nuclear missile
Document seen by Guardian details web of front companies and middlemen
Ian Cobain and Ian Traynor
Wednesday January 4, 2006
http://www.guardian.co.uk/armstrade/story/0,,1677540,00.html
Intelligence report claims nuclear market thriving
European firms warned they are main target of illicit trade in weapons
parts
Ian Traynor and Ian Cobain
Wednesday January 4, 2006
http://www.guardian.co.uk/armstrade/story/0,,1677555,00.html
(They actually use the WMD word in this article)
True again, President Amadinejad is behaving almost as if he's in the
pay of Anglo-Saxon petro-imperialism;. Though the Iranian regime
continues to deny -- much good will it do them! -- any nuclear-weapons
ambitions.
Now here's a letter to the Guardian from Prof John Sloboda (of the
Oxford Research Group), which the paper, in all fainess to it, has
published, "IRAN INTELLIGENCE IS NOT TRUSTWORTHY":
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1680456,00.html
With this, at least, we can agree.
PETER PASTMASTER
"Freeman" <libertyst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1136908414.6...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> Now here's a letter to the Guardian from Prof John Sloboda (of the
> Oxford Research Group), which the paper, in all fainess to it, has
> published, "IRAN INTELLIGENCE IS NOT TRUSTWORTHY":
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1680456,00.html
> With this, at least, we can agree.
>
http://www.islamonline.net/livedialogue/english/Guestcv.asp?hGuestID=czEYkx
Sloboda is a common-or-garden academic lefty. He'd rather see Iran with
nukes than Iran bombed. So much for him...
ROBBIE
Freeman
Just because Stalin was a commie, it didn't mean Hitler was a goody. ;-)
Crowley
Why Has the UK Guardian Become a Mouthpiece of Invade-Iran
Agitprop?...................
Simple. In recent years the Guardian/Observer has been increasingly
taken over by New Labourites, zionists, and neo-cons. David Aaronovitch
(now gone to the equally neo-con Times) and Nick Cohen to name but two
of many.
It's little more than a New Labour propaganda sheet these days
benefiting from millions of pounds in tax-payers money for those
thousands of adverts for public sector non-jobs.
I suppose that's why its lost thousands of readers many departed for
the drippy, PC but anti-war Independent.
Freeman
Crowley wrote:
> Why Has the UK Guardian Become a Mouthpiece of Invade-Iran
> Agitprop?...................
>
> Simple. In recent years the Guardian/Observer has been increasingly
> taken over by New Labourites,
> zionists,
with a touch of the "ZioNazis"
> and neo-cons. David Aaronovitch
> (now gone to the equally neo-con Times) and Nick Cohen to name but two
> of many.
>
> It's little more than a New Labour propaganda sheet these days
> benefiting from millions of pounds in tax-payers money for those
> thousands of adverts for public sector non-jobs.
>
> I suppose that's why its lost thousands of readers many departed for
> the drippy, PC but anti-war Independent.
And how long before the Independent's editor goes the way of the
Mirror's, set up as a liar, a homophobe, a paedophile, or whatever can
be most "credibly" brought against him?
MM
wrote:
Huh, the Independent is practically gasping its last breath. Have you
seen their web site? Talk about cutting back the fat! Now compare it
to the Guardian's web site.
MM
Crowley
MM wrote:
> Huh, the Independent is practically gasping its last breath. Have you
> seen their web site? Talk about cutting back the fat! Now compare it
> to the Guardian's web site.
Paid for by the millions in tax-payers moneyrolling in to pay for all
those public sector non-job adverts.
BESSIE COULDN'T HELP IT
A better aphorism to offer academics is: just because Hitler was a baddy,
doesn't make Stalin a goody.
ROBBIE
>
BESSIE COULDN'T HELP IT
I wish people would stop using this West-Coast invented left-wing political
language.
ROBBIE
Freeman
BESSIE COULDN'T HELP IT wrote:
> "Freeman" <libertyst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1137070559.3...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > PETER PASTMASTER wrote:
> > > "Freeman" <libertyst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:1136908414.6...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Now here's a letter to the Guardian from Prof John Sloboda (of the
> > > > Oxford Research Group), which the paper, in all fainess to it, has
> > > > published, "IRAN INTELLIGENCE IS NOT TRUSTWORTHY":
> > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1680456,00.html
> > > > With this, at least, we can agree.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> http://www.islamonline.net/livedialogue/english/Guestcv.asp?hGuestID=czEYkx
> > >
> > > Sloboda is a common-or-garden academic lefty. He'd rather see Iran with
> > > nukes than Iran bombed. So much for him...
> > >
> > > ROBBIE
> >
> > Just because Stalin was a commie, it didn't mean Hitler was a goody. ;-)
>
>
> A better aphorism to offer academics is: just because Hitler was a baddy,
> doesn't make Stalin a goody.
>
> ROBBIE
Three three phases of totalitarian imperialism:- the Nazi (1933-45),
the Soviet (1945-1986), and -- we as yet lack a similar name --
ourselves, the Ameican/"Anglo-Saxon" (2001-.....).
Ariadne
BESSIE COULDN'T HELP IT wrote:
> "Freeman" <libertyst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1137073328....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Crowley wrote:
> > > Agitprop?...................
> > >
> > > taken over by New Labourites,
> > whose "socialism" now begins to look like National Socialism
> > > zionists,
> > with a touch of the "ZioNazis"
> > > and neo-cons. David Aaronovitch
> I wish people would stop using this West-Coast invented left-wing political
> language.
>
> ROBBIE
There are two possible responses:
1. They're not people
2. They are so challenged, verbally and cognitively,
that their highest-level functioning is as parrots for
the less intelligent and less educated portions of
mass media.