Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

(repost) - Farage's loonies (UKIP) vs Andy's Loonies (KISP) - who would you choose and why?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Andy Wainwright

unread,
May 20, 2013, 8:45:00 PM5/20/13
to
Forget UKIP, KISP are the real deal.

Problem.
We have laws that are draconian, illogical and poorly enforced.

This discriminates against the honest in favour of liars and manipulators.

Solution.
We have very relaxed and humane laws, very logical laws, and properly
enforced laws.

KISP stands for Keep It Simple Party. We can't promise to make everyone
better off, but we can promise a fairer and freer society.

Our first manifesto deals with three burning issues.

The Law.
We believe criminal law should only come into play when it involves the
non-consenting, children or wildlife.
We believe that only those who pose a risk to themselves or others, or
an unnaceptable nuisance to the public if free, should be detained in
custody.
We believe that introducing military discipline to community service
would remove it's "soft" image and provide jobs for veterans.

Welfare Reform.
We believe means testing punishes those who work and save for themselves
or their offspring. As such welfare should be replaced by a basic
citizens income payable to all regardless of income, savings or
employment status.
We believe premiums should be available for age, disability and previous
national insurance scheme contributions, with deductions for new
immigrants for a probationary period.

Immigration.
Potential migrants must be able to offer evidence that they can support
themselves free of poverty, crime and slavery with minimal help from the
state.
Those with a British sponsor such as a spouse, friend, relative or
employer must have that sponsor legally take responsibility for ensuring
the above.
Those without must wait outside the country or in quarantine whilst
exhaustive checks are carried out on their ability to support themselves
as above.

Anyway, Farage makes a lot more than I do for running his bunch of
loonies. As an MP or MEP, I'm asking for just �20k per year, anything
else I'll donate to the favoured charities of my constituants.

So would you vote for me of Farage? I'd like to know why?

Mentalguy2k8

unread,
May 21, 2013, 6:12:59 AM5/21/13
to

"Andy Wainwright" <andrewricha...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:knefr8$5qk$1...@dont-email.me...

> So would you vote for me of Farage? I'd like to know why?

What's your policy on the EU, and which "consensual" illegal activities are
you referring to? Drugs, I suppose?

Andy Wainwright

unread,
May 21, 2013, 8:33:34 AM5/21/13
to
I say, let's trust the people instead of politicians, whether UK or EU.

If a politican wants to interfere with peoples' private lives, we're
better off without them.

The purpose of having a government at all is to facilitate freedom. So
many are brainwashed by the politicians and the big buck media that
props them up to trust the government and fear the citizen.

Do you want to vote for a government that likes the people or hates
them? Being one of the people, I'd assume you'd go for the former. But
then again, people are brainwashed into voting for restriction and
repression. You don't have to be.

As for drugs, the most mind bending substance of all is fear. People
under the influence of fear can't think rationally, but instead descend
into the base animal fight or flight instincts.


Norman Wells

unread,
May 21, 2013, 12:26:05 PM5/21/13
to
Andy Wainwright wrote:
> On 21/05/2013 11:12, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
>> "Andy Wainwright" <andrewricha...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
>> message news:knefr8$5qk$1...@dont-email.me...

> If a politican wants to interfere with peoples' private lives, we're
> better off without them.
>
> The purpose of having a government at all is to facilitate freedom.

Oh yeah? Where does that ludicrous notion come from?

> So many are brainwashed by the politicians and the big buck media that
> props them up to trust the government and fear the citizen.
>
> Do you want to vote for a government that likes the people or hates
> them? Being one of the people, I'd assume you'd go for the former. But
> then again, people are brainwashed into voting for restriction and
> repression. You don't have to be.

Well, you do actually. That's because every single law we have is a
restrictive law. It's how it works.

Andy Wainwright

unread,
May 22, 2013, 5:31:05 PM5/22/13
to
Take the highway code. This actually maximises freedom for drivers-
without it it would be extremely difficult to navigate from one town to
another safely.


0 new messages