Better look at home then John I have sent link home
Jen
Why a centre? The word is overused: motorists' discount centre, health
centre, and so on ad nauseam.
--
He is not here; but far away
The noise of life begins again
And ghastly thro' the drizzling rain
On the bald street breaks the blank day.
Thank you for the link, John.
I watched the following video about the history of clocks:
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7060699621163470194
The graphics and the background music add to the effectiveness.
One thing I learned was that our digital watches contain "vibrating atoms"
which do the same thing as swinging pendulums, but with more accuracy.
Videos like this certainly stimulate our curiousity!
---Sea
ehhhh ? - eyes a bit confused !!!!!
No need to visit the centre - You's can just view the science
video's....
Hello Sea
Yes - I watched that one too !!!! Really informative !!
John
Cos I pop in here at work and can't spend too much time looking at web sites
Jen
Now why can't I see John's original post?
What you done with it, you lot? :-))
--
MCC
Just think - If John Harrison (who came from Wakefield) hadn't invented
the marine time-keeper, Cook might never have been a successful
explorer. <http://wakefield.110mb.com/people/harrison.html>)
--
wtwjgc (Joe)
Main website:- <http://wakefield.110mb.com/>
Dunno Mike, but I can't either. :(
Perhaps he's shy. :)
--
Heard melodies are sweet, but those Unheard are sweeter
flyi...@tiscali.co.uk FN 2같8 +, Mungo Brandybuck of Buckland
It was posted via Google groups. Perhaps you all have those blocked?
I ain't got nuffink blocked.
--
MCC
Me neither and I can't see the original in NIN but it is there on Plusnet.
--
Sandra
People will forget what you said.
People will forget what you did, but
People will never forget how you made them feel.
Nor here.
That's an incredible story, Joe. Harrison certainly had tenacity...
all those years working on making improvements in his clocks.
Makes me wonder what it is that's inside a clock which makes
it so much more accurate than another. I'm sure it's too technical
for me to understand. :)
---Sea
If you can get hold of the book 'Longitude' written by Dava Sobel you will
find it a fascinating read.
Poor Harrison and his son got treated abysmally by the British Board of
Admiralty - nothing new there then :-)
--
MCC
There was a tv programme about him sometime last year, fascinating. Also the
astronomy club Rob is in has Alan Chapman as president and he pops over 2-3
times a year to give talks, he loves the subject of John Harrison and
clocks/timekeeping, heard a couple from him on the subject. (as an aside, he
is such a fascinating person he could base a talk on the phone directory and
you'd listen)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Chapman_(historian)
--
http://www.reverbnation.com/robgreen
http://www.robgreenmusic.110mb.com/
http://picasaweb.google.com/astrochickster/ScarboroughYorkWhitby
Yes, I saw that programme on TV. John Harrison was also the subject of a
short local film.
Allan is very good. I've seen him on one of the science series.
> That's an incredible story, Joe. Harrison certainly had tenacity...
> all those years working on making improvements in his clocks.
> Makes me wonder what it is that's inside a clock which makes
> it so much more accurate than another. I'm sure it's too technical
> for me to understand. :)
To put it simply, counterbalanced pendulums so that external movement
(like the rocking of a ship) doesn't affect the ticking.
Also more precise machining of the parts.
--
Ali
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/my.web.pages/ Don't go there.
UPS/FUNTO July stats: http://my-web-pages.110mb.com/stats/
Five years' statistics now available.
Thanks, Ali. I never even thought about the necessity for
counterbalancing on a rocking ship.
Precise machining, yes. Also, parts that don't wear out, I guess.
Is that why they have diamonds inside the watch mechanism?
They used to advertise that, IIRC.
---Sea
> "Ali" <ali.on...@ntlworld.com> wrote
>> To put it simply, counterbalanced pendulums so that external movement
>> (like the rocking of a ship) doesn't affect the ticking.
>> Also more precise machining of the parts.
>> Ali
>
> Thanks, Ali. I never even thought about the necessity for
> counterbalancing on a rocking ship.
> Precise machining, yes. Also, parts that don't wear out, I guess.
> Is that why they have diamonds inside the watch mechanism?
> They used to advertise that, IIRC.
> ---Sea
I suppose that was the reason, although, while the diamonds wouldn't wear
out, the part they wear bearing against would.