Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Relative to my post about Griff RJ

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Pete C

unread,
Jan 2, 2008, 1:14:50 PM1/2/08
to
90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)
--
Pete C
London UK


Flyińg Ńuń 2°°8 +

unread,
Jan 2, 2008, 1:49:13 PM1/2/08
to
Pete C wrote:
> 90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)

Was Griff RJ at the helm then? ;)
--
Heard melodies are sweet, but those Unheard are sweeter
flyi...@tiscali.co.uk FN 2같8 +, Mungo Brandybuck of Buckland


Jeff Gaines

unread,
Jan 2, 2008, 2:07:09 PM1/2/08
to
On 02/01/2008 in message <5u24kdF...@mid.individual.net> Flyiñg Ñuñ
2°°8 + wrote:

>Pete C wrote:
>>90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)
>
>Was Griff RJ at the helm then? ;)

No, he swerved in front of it :-)

--
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
All those who believe in psychokinesis raise my hand.

wtwjgc

unread,
Jan 2, 2008, 2:10:15 PM1/2/08
to
On 02/01/2008 18:14, Pete C wrote:
> 90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)

Don't tell me - Griff was at the wheel! ;-)

--
wtwjgc (Joe)
http://wakefield.110mb.com/ or http://wakefield.911mb.com/
http://wakefield.myminicity.com/ind or http://wakefield.myminicity.com/
http://www.localcooling.com/ref/?type=link&amp;id=26575

Michaelangelo

unread,
Jan 3, 2008, 7:45:23 AM1/3/08
to
Pete C, having carefully considered all the angles, harangued us with
the following:

> 90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)

Was it under sail at the time? :)

--
Michaelangelo
"Youth is Wasted on the Young"
www.mikenagel.co.uk

Accessible, self-catering, holiday
accommodation for physically disabled people
www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk


Flyińg Ńuń 2°°8 +

unread,
Jan 3, 2008, 8:17:42 AM1/3/08
to
Michaelangelo wrote:
> Pete C, having carefully considered all the angles, harangued us with
> the following:
>> 90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)
>
> Was it under sail at the time? :)

I got the impression that it was sort of full ahead both until some bright
spark noticed from the radar that they weren't actually moving. :)

Pete C

unread,
Jan 3, 2008, 4:23:46 PM1/3/08
to
Jeff Gaines wrote:
> On 02/01/2008 in message <5u24kdF...@mid.individual.net> Flyińg

> Ńuń 2°°8 + wrote:
>
>> Pete C wrote:
>>> 90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)
>>
>> Was Griff RJ at the helm then? ;)
>
> No, he swerved in front of it :-)

OMG........sooooooooooo possibly true! :)

Pete C

unread,
Jan 3, 2008, 4:25:40 PM1/3/08
to
Flyińg Ńuń 2°°8 + wrote:
> Michaelangelo wrote:
>> Pete C, having carefully considered all the angles, harangued us with
>> the following:
>>> 90,000 ton vessel on sandbank off Dover :)
>>
>> Was it under sail at the time? :)
>
> I got the impression that it was sort of full ahead both until some
> bright spark noticed from the radar that they weren't actually
> moving. :)
No one on watch? You can't not know the Varne is there!!! No, it isn't
thunder, it's shipping Co. heads rolling :)
0 new messages