The Truth About Vaccine as a Life-Saving "Medicine"
PeterB - Original
Infectious disease mortality declined dramatically prior to
availability of most vaccine (See "Public Health at the Crossroads,"
by R. Beaglehole and R. Bonita, pg 43) such that only 3.5%, at most,
of the decline in disease-related mortality from 1900 to 1975 could be
attributed to measures introduced for the control of these diseases.
In other words, vaccine may have accounted for only 1% of these
mortality declines, or none at all, we do not know. And without
assessment of the risk of adverse reactions that might show vaccines
to be responsible for an overall reduction in life years, this
"intervention" violates the Precautionary Principle, as well. The
Precautionary Principle states that the burden of proof for a medical
intervention must rest with its proponents. It is critical to
understand that rates of infection, unlike measles mortality, were
never reliably assessed and were, in fact, dramatically under
reported. According to Alfred S. Evans and Richard A. Kaslow in their
book, "Viral Infections of Humans," incidence of measles were under-
reported by at least a factor of ten. So say the authors: "...prior
to introduction of measles vaccine, about 400,000 cases of measles
were reported in the United States every year, but 4 million children
were born and essentially all of them ultimately developed measles
antibody that could only have been acquired as the result of
infection. Thus, the mean true number of cases per year was about 4
million." So the infection rate was ten times higher than is commonly
reported, meaning the true mortality rate prior to vaccine was just
one tenth what is claimed by the drug makers. So measles is not the
1:500 fatality risk claimed by pro-vaccine agents of industry, whose
promotion of vaccine rests mostly on theoretical science in the form
of antibody titres, community surveys, and historical fallacies. Any
discussion of the fatality risk of measles based on faulty data
supplied by vaccine makers, in the absence of meaningful safety data,
is an assault on public health.
Peter B.
"PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message
news:af2af8d8-887c-4853...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> The Truth About Vaccine as a Life-Saving "Medicine"
>
Too Funny! Posted by the oldest PB?
PB The eldest?
PB Senile
PB before intelligence?
Dad?
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:af2af8d8-887c-4853...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > The Truth About Vaccine as a Life-Saving "Medicine"
>
> Too Funny! Posted by the oldest PB?
>
> PB The eldest?
>
> PB Senile
>
> PB before intelligence?
>
> Dad?
Let us know when you think you can discuss any of the facts presented
on the failure of vaccine based on the published science.
Peter B.
======================================================
Us? As in all your socks?
Pick one and have a discussion the future of life because of science and
drugs.
But first, you say you are the original, prove it of drop it.
t
"Peter B." <in...@i-brag.com> wrote in message
news:4ae4cd7a$1...@news.x-privat.org...
trigonometry1972@gmail.com |
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:af2af8d8-887c-4853...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > The Truth About Vaccine as a Life-Saving "Medicine"
>
> Too Funny! Posted by the oldest PB?
>
> PB The eldest?
>
> PB Senile
>
> PB before intelligence?
>
> Dad?
A huge dose of vitamin A at 200,000 IU dose daily for two days
at the outset of the infection will decrease the rate
of complications from the disease.
What do you think about that Peter B. the second?
Am I just fixated on vitamins?.................Trig
Peter B.
<trigonom...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef1418f3-fa80-4fef...@w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
==================================================
Dunno, but I like being Peter B. 2nd is like Jr. a never will be.
trigonometry1972@gmail.com |
> <trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
You should have an opinion as what I said
was highly relevant. Do a bit of research
it might expand your view of the things.
Peter B.
<trigonom...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:da7f4e63-249a-4ec9...@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
===================================================
I did not see the disease in question, so any opinion would be
worthless.
trigonometry1972@gmail.com |
We were talking about measles. Oh that
is right, you were never on topic.
Your opinion is worthless you say.
An interesting admission on your part.
Peter B.
<trigonom...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c0de2eb3-0f90-4b99...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
===================================================
A pitiful conclusion on your part. A review of this thread with all the
quotes in this message never mentions measles, nor does the subject
line. If it was meant to be humorous sarcasm you get a 10 out of 100.
PeterB - Original
If you had bothered to read the original post of this thread, you
would know that measles is, in fact, discussed there. But don't let
the facts get in your way.
trigonometry1972@gmail.com |
> <trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c0de2eb3-0f90-4b99...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 25, 11:08 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:da7f4e63-249a-4ec9...@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 25, 9:52 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
>
> > > <trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:ef1418f3-fa80-4fef...@w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Oct 23, 8:51 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in
Really if you go to the beginning of the thread
which of course you avoid, you'd see it
was on measles. I am on target and dead on
serious.
Peter B the second even Chung and Ironjustice are doing better than
you of late......................Trig
Peter B.
=======================================================
Well excuse me for jumping in at the middle of the thread, and excuse
all the twerps that didn't stick to the original subject. BUT, it is a
well known Usenet thang that after the third message the thread changes.
I am taking my time explaining this to you as you are obviously lacking
in Usenet knowledge.
I also noticed that you have not been "on thread" during this little
sidetrip and only used the measles thing as an excuse to be self
righteous and a poor attempt at humor. PKB? I think so.
Peter B.
<trigonom...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:890d6927-5250-4427...@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
======================================================
See my message to *cough* Original. You are expanding the "target" which
is not the same one I was discussing. As to my ranking on your list, it
is of little import to me. Your complaint is tantamount to one from
Janet Drew for the very same thing and holds the same weight.
Jan Drew
trigonometry1972@gmail.com |
Indeed that is how I view you except Jan is capable of doing
cut and paste and you don't even do that.
You purposely ignore the top of the thread and
you want the last word. Couldn't get the last
word back in the day with the long deceased wife?
So now you seek it on usenet discussions?
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:97f7b0a0-1f02-49ed...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
You were the first twerp to do that, idiot. As usual.
> BUT, it is a
> well known Usenet thang that after the third message the thread changes.
> I am taking my time explaining this to you as you are obviously lacking
> in Usenet knowledge.
When that happens, moron, it's because pharmnuts like you cannot
address the facts and purposely engage in diversions.
> I also noticed that you have not been "on thread" during this little
> sidetrip and only used the measles thing as an excuse to be self
> righteous...
Look again, shit for brains. I had responded twice in this entire
thread, both times to you. The first was to note that your personal
attack was just an excuse to avoid addressing the facts of the
original post. The second was to point out that you lied to another
poster about what the original post had to say. IOW, you're a
despicable liar on all counts.