Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Number One Cause of Most Human Disease

0 views
Skip to first unread message

PeterB

unread,
May 3, 2009, 12:11:24 PM5/3/09
to
The Number One Cause of Most Human Disease

According to WHO, more human disease is linked to avitaminosis than
any other single causative factor. A subclinical stage of avitaminosis
is a chronic condition resulting from vitamin insufficiency that may
later lead to acute or frank deficiency. The question is, how often
are these illnesses appropriately diagnosed and treated at any stage?
Recent studies show that misdiagnosis is a common feature of modern
medical practice. The list of nutrient-deficient diseases that
follows represents a broad range of symptomatic illness that might
express as myriad other diseases not commonly understood for their
relationship to serum or cellular nutrient levels. A number of good
online resources discuss various diseases that are treatable and often
curable using vitamin and mineral therapy alone. Indeed, as metabolic
health (homeostasis) can be maintained only with proper levels of
vitamins and minerals, it becomes clear that drugs, not vitamin
supplements, are the "alternative." We should hold our drug-friendly
media accountable for falsely characterizing natural medicine as
"alternative" and thus misleading the public.

anemia
angular stomatitis
ariboflavinosis
Beriberi
cardiovascular beriberi
cerebellar ataxia
cerebral beriberi
cheilosis
desquamation
dysarthria
glossitis
hemorrhagic disease
hyporeflexia
infantile beriberi
keratomalacia
lymphopenia
maidism
mal de la rosa
mal rosso
mayidism
nctalopia
nyctalopia
ophthalmoplegia
osteomalacia
osteoporosis
pellagra
pigmented retinopathy
ptosis
rachitis
rickets
scurvy
thrombocytosis
Xerophthalmia

PeterB

unread,
May 3, 2009, 12:14:36 PM5/3/09
to
The Number One Cause of Most Human Disease

According to WHO, more human disease is linked to avitaminosis than
any other single causative factor. A subclinical stage of avitaminosis
is a chronic condition resulting from vitamin insufficiency that may
later lead to acute or frank deficiency. The question is, how often
are these illnesses appropriately diagnosed and treated at any stage?
Recent studies show that misdiagnosis is a common feature of modern
medical practice. The list of nutrient-deficient diseases that
follows represents a broad range of symptomatic illness that might
express as myriad other diseases not commonly understood for their

relationship to vitamin levels. A number of good online resources


discuss various diseases that are treatable and often curable using
vitamin and mineral therapy alone. Indeed, as metabolic health

(homeostasis) can be maintained only with proper levels of nutrients,

Message has been deleted

PeterB

unread,
May 3, 2009, 1:25:17 PM5/3/09
to

I meant to add the link below. Also, note that chronically low
vitamin and mineral levels are actually a greater disease vector than
frank deficiency. For instance, according to WHO, most of those whose
health is adversely affected by low iron levels are not anemic. BTW,
in addition to cardiovascular beriberi, there is good science
supporting cardiovascular "scurvy," ie., heart disease resulting from
low but not immediately life-threatening vitamin C levels. Vitamin C
intake high enough to avoid frank deficiency (scurvy) can still be LOW
enough to result in disease and reduced lifespan.

http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2005-10/2005-10-05-voa8.cfm

PeterB

unread,
May 3, 2009, 2:52:37 PM5/3/09
to
On May 3, 2:25 pm, Martin <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 3 May 2009 09:11:24 -0700 (PDT), PeterB <p...@mytrashmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >The Number One Cause of Most Human Disease
>
> >According  to WHO, more human disease is linked to avitaminosis than
> >any other single causative factor. A subclinical stage of avitaminosis
> >is a  chronic condition resulting from vitamin insufficiency that may
> >later lead to acute or frank deficiency. The question is, how often
> >are these illnesses appropriately diagnosed and treated at any stage?
>
> Might that have something to do with the fact that a lot of people are
> malnourished? Unfortunately, those people are usually malnourished
> because they don't have the money to buy enough food...

Having enough food does not ensure adequate vitamin or mineral
levels. Disease rates in the USA, for instance, are evidence that
*quality* of diet is as important as *quantity* of intake. THINK.

> , which means they
> certainly don't have the money to buy supplements. Which is why Big
> Supplement is paying you to scare people who do have the money (but
> don't need the supplements because they get enough from just food)
> into thinking they need their supplements.

I did not snip this because I believe your persronal attacks say more
about you than I ever could. You can find yourself in the "Warning"
post.

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/browse_frm/thread/9575a3c13bb62ac4#

> You don't have a clue what these words mean, do you? You just copy the
> script your bosses give you. Or you make shit up. You've done that
> before.

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/browse_frm/thread/9575a3c13bb62ac4#

PeterB

unread,
May 3, 2009, 3:23:05 PM5/3/09
to
On May 3, 2:25 pm, Martin <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009 09:11:24 -0700 (PDT), PeterB <p...@mytrashmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >The Number One Cause of Most Human Disease
>
> >According  to WHO, more human disease is linked to avitaminosis than
> >any other single causative factor. A subclinical stage of avitaminosis
> >is a  chronic condition resulting from vitamin insufficiency that may
> >later lead to acute or frank deficiency. The question is, how often
> >are these illnesses appropriately diagnosed and treated at any stage?
>
> Might that have something to do with the fact that a lot of people are
> malnourished? Unfortunately, those people are usually malnourished
> because they don't have the money to buy enough food...

Having enough food does not ensure adequate vitamin or mineral
levels. Disease rates in the USA, for instance, are evidence that
*quality* of diet is as important as *quantity* of intake. THINK.

> , which means they
> certainly don't have the money to buy supplements. Which is why Big
> Supplement is paying you to scare people who do have the money (but
> don't need the supplements because they get enough from just food)
> into thinking they need their supplements.

Your lies and persronal attacks say more about you than I ever could.
As for dietary intake of nutrients, if it is sufficient, then by all
means do not take supplements. I personally eat well but choose to
take supplements as a way to ensure optimal nutrition. Adequate
nutrient levels will prevent most disease, but optimal levels will
ensure longer life. It's entirely up to you.

> You don't have a clue what these words mean, do you? You just copy the
> script your bosses give you. Or you make shit up. You've done that
> before.

Please say hello to your sponsors for me. Don't forget to find


yourself in the "Warning" post.

Here is the link:

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/browse_frm/thread/9575a3c13bb62ac4#

0 new messages