Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Royal mail delivery cock up/robbery?? Part 2
8 views
Skip to first unread message
andrew fox
May 1, 2012, 4:18:03 PM5/1/12
to
well PO claim delivery but don't have a sig to show, alleged
"recipient" says its up to him to claim and i can sit back, is
this correct. this
This is his latest email, is he correct.....
"Dear andrewianfox33,
Hi Andrew, ebay will not need to be involved any more in this and all I
require from you is the original posing receipt which should have all
the info on I require, I also need your address etc. as I will claim as
recipient.
http://www.royalmail.com/customer-service/personal-customers/refunds-and-compensation/claims-process
Copy of claim form P58 is available on the mail site. Much easier if I
claim then you will not have to cancell ebay transaction and refund me.
Hope you agree, cannot do anything until 15 working days have past. Hope
to receive info. from you shortly. Len Sengelow. 3, Ocean Road,
Hartlepool, TS24 9RH.
- slugsy21
Reply in your email program or through My Messages
Respond Now"
??
Andrew
"recipient" says its up to him to claim and i can sit back, is
this correct. this
This is his latest email, is he correct.....
"Dear andrewianfox33,
Hi Andrew, ebay will not need to be involved any more in this and all I
require from you is the original posing receipt which should have all
the info on I require, I also need your address etc. as I will claim as
recipient.
http://www.royalmail.com/customer-service/personal-customers/refunds-and-compensation/claims-process
Copy of claim form P58 is available on the mail site. Much easier if I
claim then you will not have to cancell ebay transaction and refund me.
Hope you agree, cannot do anything until 15 working days have past. Hope
to receive info. from you shortly. Len Sengelow. 3, Ocean Road,
Hartlepool, TS24 9RH.
- slugsy21
Reply in your email program or through My Messages
Respond Now"
??
Andrew
Moles
May 1, 2012, 5:33:26 PM5/1/12
to
In article <0yXnr.385954$ed1.1...@fx04.am4>, andrew...@ntlworld.com
says...
says...
>
> well PO claim delivery but don't have a sig to show, alleged
> "recipient" says its up to him to claim and i can sit back, is
> this correct. this
>
>
> This is his latest email, is he correct.....
>
> "Dear andrewianfox33,
>
> Hi Andrew, ebay will not need to be involved any more in this and all I
> require from you is the original posing receipt which should have all
> the info on I require, I also need your address etc. as I will claim as
> recipient.
> http://www.royalmail.com/customer-service/personal-customers/refunds-and-compensation/claims-process
> Copy of claim form P58 is available on the mail site. Much easier if I
> claim then you will not have to cancell ebay transaction and refund me.
> Hope you agree, cannot do anything until 15 working days have past. Hope
> to receive info. from you shortly
>
>
>
> well PO claim delivery but don't have a sig to show, alleged
> "recipient" says its up to him to claim and i can sit back, is
> this correct. this
>
>
> This is his latest email, is he correct.....
>
> "Dear andrewianfox33,
>
> Hi Andrew, ebay will not need to be involved any more in this and all I
> require from you is the original posing receipt which should have all
> the info on I require, I also need your address etc. as I will claim as
> recipient.
> http://www.royalmail.com/customer-service/personal-customers/refunds-and-compensation/claims-process
> Copy of claim form P58 is available on the mail site. Much easier if I
> claim then you will not have to cancell ebay transaction and refund me.
> Hope you agree, cannot do anything until 15 working days have past. Hope
> to receive info. from you shortly
>
>
>
> Reply in your email program or through My Messages
> Respond Now"
>
>
> ??
>
> Andrew
Posting his name and address here wasn't very neighbourly.
> Respond Now"
>
>
> ??
>
> Andrew
andrew fox
May 2, 2012, 2:55:14 AM5/2/12
to
Fair comment BUT is he right, what does it all have to do with
me, I am certainly reluctant to send him the original posting
receipt
me, I am certainly reluctant to send him the original posting
receipt
Apellation Controlee
May 2, 2012, 3:17:40 AM5/2/12
to
the recipient.
Rob Morley
May 2, 2012, 10:34:37 AM5/2/12
to
On Wed, 02 May 2012 08:17:40 +0100
Apellation Controlee <enigm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And I would have thought the Royal Mail's contract was with you, not
> the recipient.
ISTR it's legally weird, the Post Office has some sort of special
Apellation Controlee <enigm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And I would have thought the Royal Mail's contract was with you, not
> the recipient.
status which means that normal contract law doesn't apply. I expect
someone will be along to explain it shortly.
Moles
May 2, 2012, 10:50:44 AM5/2/12
to
Peter Parry
May 2, 2012, 12:49:16 PM5/2/12
to
On Wed, 2 May 2012 15:34:37 +0100, Rob Morley <nos...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>
>ISTR it's legally weird, the Post Office has some sort of special
>status which means that normal contract law doesn't apply. I expect
>someone will be along to explain it shortly.
Royal Mail operate under statute not contract. Instead of a contract
they operate ‘Schemes’ published under the Postal Services Act 2000.
When you send something using most Royal Mail services there in no
contract between the sender and Royal Mail.
One consequence of this is that in case of loss either the sender or
intended recipient can institute a compensation claim.
wrote:
>
>ISTR it's legally weird, the Post Office has some sort of special
>status which means that normal contract law doesn't apply. I expect
>someone will be along to explain it shortly.
they operate ‘Schemes’ published under the Postal Services Act 2000.
When you send something using most Royal Mail services there in no
contract between the sender and Royal Mail.
One consequence of this is that in case of loss either the sender or
intended recipient can institute a compensation claim.
andrew fox
May 2, 2012, 2:46:07 PM5/2/12
to
the buyer managed to pull a fast one??
andrew
Moles
May 3, 2012, 3:19:40 AM5/3/12
to
news:Phfor.185808$Od1....@fx32.am4...
You'd better hope they don't do a search for themselves and find out what
you've been saying about them.....
> On 01/05/12 21:18, andrew fox wrote:
>> well PO claim delivery but don't have a sig to show, alleged "recipient"
>> says its up to him to claim and i can sit back, is this correct. this
>>
>>
>> This is his latest email, is he correct.....
>>
>> "Dear andrewianfox33,
>>
>> Hi Andrew, ebay will not need to be involved any more in this and all I
>> require from you is the original posing receipt which should have all
>> the info on I require, I also need your address etc. as I will claim as
>> recipient.
>> http://www.royalmail.com/customer-service/personal-customers/refunds-and-compensation/claims-process
>> Copy of claim form P58 is available on the mail site. Much easier if I
>> claim then you will not have to cancell ebay transaction and refund me.
>> Hope you agree, cannot do anything until 15 working days have past. Hope
>> to receive info. from you shortly. >>
>> -
>> well PO claim delivery but don't have a sig to show, alleged "recipient"
>> says its up to him to claim and i can sit back, is this correct. this
>>
>>
>> This is his latest email, is he correct.....
>>
>> "Dear andrewianfox33,
>>
>> Hi Andrew, ebay will not need to be involved any more in this and all I
>> require from you is the original posing receipt which should have all
>> the info on I require, I also need your address etc. as I will claim as
>> recipient.
>> http://www.royalmail.com/customer-service/personal-customers/refunds-and-compensation/claims-process
>> Copy of claim form P58 is available on the mail site. Much easier if I
>> claim then you will not have to cancell ebay transaction and refund me.
>> Hope you agree, cannot do anything until 15 working days have past. Hope
>> to receive info. from you shortly. >>
>> Reply in your email program or through My Messages
>> Respond Now"
>>
>>
>> ??
>>
>> Andrew
>>
> this item now occuring as a second chance offer on ebay, has the
> buyer managed to pull a fast one??
>
> andrew
And yet again you post the name and address of the buyer.
>> Respond Now"
>>
>>
>> ??
>>
>> Andrew
>>
> this item now occuring as a second chance offer on ebay, has the
> buyer managed to pull a fast one??
>
> andrew
You'd better hope they don't do a search for themselves and find out what
you've been saying about them.....
andrew fox
May 3, 2012, 3:29:18 AM5/3/12
to
seller seems pretty plain, i see no ref to buyer...
andrew send privately if you wish, thats my real addy,
Moles
May 3, 2012, 4:12:20 AM5/3/12
to
news:itqor.205778$Sb1.2...@fx03.am4...
That is because I snipped it out in my reply to the post where you did
include it.
include it.
andrew fox
May 3, 2012, 8:24:15 AM5/3/12
to
petrolcan
May 3, 2012, 8:33:39 AM5/3/12
to
In article <QNuor.96041$Yw1....@fx12.am4>, andrew fox says...
You're a bit thick then.
You posted his addy in your original post and then reposted it when you
replied to your own post.
That clear enough for you?
You posted his addy in your original post and then reposted it when you
replied to your own post.
That clear enough for you?
Message has been deleted
andrew fox
May 3, 2012, 9:00:34 AM5/3/12
to
On 03/05/12 13:50, Anthony R. Gold wrote:
> twice posted the buyer's full name and address details as:
>
> L** S*******.
> 3, O**** Road,
> H*********, TS24 ***.
still coming to grips with who won the top or bottom posting
war ( and why) .......... :-)
Andrew
probably my philosophy degree gets in the way of dealing with
the hoi poloi......
> On Thu, 03 May 2012 13:24:15 +0100, andrew fox<andrew...@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
>
>> you are a helpful chap ain't you, i am none the wiser thanks..
>
> What is your problem - are you unable to read your own posts wherein you
> wrote:
>
>> you are a helpful chap ain't you, i am none the wiser thanks..
>
> twice posted the buyer's full name and address details as:
>
> L** S*******.
> 3, O**** Road,
> H*********, TS24 ***.
still coming to grips with who won the top or bottom posting
war ( and why) .......... :-)
Andrew
probably my philosophy degree gets in the way of dealing with
the hoi poloi......
petrolcan
May 3, 2012, 10:15:57 AM5/3/12
to
In article <Sjvor.455214$yJ4.3...@fx07.am4>, andrew fox says...
Into the fuckwit box it is then.
FFS!
FFS!
Moles
May 3, 2012, 11:24:14 AM5/3/12
to
"andrew fox" <andrew...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:Sjvor.455214$yJ4.3...@fx07.am4...
Jon
May 3, 2012, 11:42:33 AM5/3/12
to
Moles wrote ...
> >>
> > this item now occuring as a second chance offer on ebay, has the
> > buyer managed to pull a fast one??
> >
> > andrew
>
> And yet again you post the name and address of the buyer.
>
> You'd better hope they don't do a search for themselves and find out what
> you've been saying about them.....
That shit stirring twat from Yorkshire would have been on the phone to
the purchaser already.
> >>
> > this item now occuring as a second chance offer on ebay, has the
> > buyer managed to pull a fast one??
> >
> > andrew
>
> And yet again you post the name and address of the buyer.
>
> You'd better hope they don't do a search for themselves and find out what
> you've been saying about them.....
the purchaser already.
Message has been deleted
petrolcan
May 3, 2012, 2:41:38 PM5/3/12
to
In article <tob5q79c1gpma3m88...@4ax.com>, Anthony R. Gold
says...
Nah, not a patch on the spack.
says...
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2012 16:42:33 +0100, Jon <b...@ho.le> wrote:
>
> > That shit stirring twat from Yorkshire would have been on the phone to
> > the purchaser already.
>
> Not Warwickshire? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/221002586225
> On Thu, 3 May 2012 16:42:33 +0100, Jon <b...@ho.le> wrote:
>
> > That shit stirring twat from Yorkshire would have been on the phone to
> > the purchaser already.
>
Nah, not a patch on the spack.
Moles
May 3, 2012, 2:53:10 PM5/3/12
to
In article <MPG.2a0cb7c56...@news.aioe.org>, b...@ho.le says...
That was going through my mind also. :-)
Moles
May 3, 2012, 2:54:40 PM5/3/12
to
In article <tob5q79c1gpma3m88...@4ax.com>, not-for-
ma...@ahjg.co.uk says...
No, not Warwickshire.
ma...@ahjg.co.uk says...
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2012 16:42:33 +0100, Jon <b...@ho.le> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2012 16:42:33 +0100, Jon <b...@ho.le> wrote:
>
> > That shit stirring twat from Yorkshire would have been on the phone to
> > the purchaser already.
>
> Not Warwickshire? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/221002586225
> > the purchaser already.
>
No, not Warwickshire.
Grimly Curmudgeon
May 3, 2012, 7:08:35 PM5/3/12
to
On Thu, 03 May 2012 14:00:34 +0100, andrew fox
<andrew...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>probably my philosophy degree gets in the way of dealing with
>the hoi poloi......
You could say that.
<andrew...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>probably my philosophy degree gets in the way of dealing with
>the hoi poloi......
Simon Finnigan
May 4, 2012, 2:54:16 PM5/4/12
to
you.
Partac
May 4, 2012, 9:22:39 PM5/4/12
to
"Simon Finnigan" wrote in message
news:1387528721357850403.79358...@news.individual.net...
life for a philosophy degree?
Mr. Benn
May 5, 2012, 12:12:10 AM5/5/12
to
"andrew fox" wrote in message news:QNuor.96041$Yw1....@fx12.am4...
Look in your "sent" folder at the post you sent. It contained the buyer's
address.
>> excuse me but where is the name and address of buyer, me the
>> seller seems pretty plain, i see no ref to buyer...
>
> That is because I snipped it out in my reply to the post where you did
> include it.
>
>
>
you are a helpful chap ain't you, i am none the wiser thanks..
===============================================
>> seller seems pretty plain, i see no ref to buyer...
>
> That is because I snipped it out in my reply to the post where you did
> include it.
>
>
>
you are a helpful chap ain't you, i am none the wiser thanks..
Look in your "sent" folder at the post you sent. It contained the buyer's
address.
allegoricus
May 6, 2012, 4:34:54 PM5/6/12
to
Simon Finnigan
May 7, 2012, 2:48:16 PM5/7/12
to
it to seem superior to anyone.
Partac
May 8, 2012, 6:16:22 AM5/8/12
to
"Simon Finnigan" wrote in message
these days committing their future to a large student debt for a philosophy
degree when they've little hope of getting a proper job to pay for it
(unless of course you intend never to work, in which case I believe the debt
never has to be paid?)
Simon Finnigan
May 13, 2012, 1:55:02 PM5/13/12
to
"qualification".
0 new messages