Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

BNP must be pleased...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

lurker

unread,
Nov 14, 2009, 7:07:51 PM11/14/09
to
that Edward Renner their main opposition man has stopped posting to
upce. Reckon?

Road_Hog

unread,
Nov 14, 2009, 7:39:14 PM11/14/09
to

"lurker" <grah...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:hdngfd$22f$1...@aioe.org...

> that Edward Renner their main opposition man has stopped posting to upce.
> Reckon?

Why don't you take a page out of his book?


lurker

unread,
Nov 14, 2009, 7:45:44 PM11/14/09
to

still sulking, are we?

Road_Hog

unread,
Nov 14, 2009, 8:15:29 PM11/14/09
to

"lurker" <grah...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:hdniog$4bf$1...@aioe.org...
>
> still sulking, are we?

About what?


lurker

unread,
Nov 14, 2009, 9:10:25 PM11/14/09
to
/"\
|\./|
| |
| |
|>~<|
| |
/'\| |/'\..
/~\| | | | \
| =[@]= | | \
| | | | | \
| ~ ~ ~ ~ |` )
| /
\ /
\ /
\ _____ /
|--//''`\--|
| (( +==)) |
|--\_|_//--|

LOL

dick...@ocp.com

unread,
Nov 16, 2009, 2:23:00 PM11/16/09
to
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:07:51 +0000, lurker <grah...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

<snip>
Who the fuck is Edward Renner?

petrolcan

unread,
Nov 16, 2009, 3:24:07 PM11/16/09
to
In article <li93g51lrclp9efp8...@4ax.com>,
dick...@ocp.com says...

He is spacker.

Go to google groups if you really want to know more.

Steve Walker

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 9:04:19 AM11/21/09
to

One of the arctic monkeys, perhaps?


Gary Baldi

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 1:55:26 PM11/21/09
to
On Nov 16, 7:23 pm, dickjo...@ocp.com wrote:

> Who the fuck is Edward Renner?

He's a dimwit fucker who was all Bertie Big Bollocks with the keyboard
warrior stuff until (from what I can ascertain from Google) he was
stupid enough to post a jpeg of an auction that he'd won which rather
unfortunately displayed his postcode. From that, the smart ones in
here were able to ascertain his identity and his address and, as you
can imagine, he's gone to ground.

Mind you, one or two of them in here seem to have a fixation about him
because they keep posting all sorts of stuff..........get a room I
say.

Fran

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 1:59:09 PM11/21/09
to

"Gary Baldi" <tim.ri...@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:9f1b22a5-38d6-45cd...@o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

====

The killfile is your friend.

Mind, I've not noticed any legal action reported. <snort>


Gary Baldi

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 2:06:41 PM11/21/09
to
On Nov 21, 6:59 pm, "Fran" <autumnac...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
>
> The killfile is your friend.
>
> Mind, I've not noticed any legal action reported. <snort>

Well there wouldn't be?

You can trace anyone via their IP address but proving who was sat at
the keyboard at the time the comments were posted is impossible.

Especially if you have six mates, sorry, witnesses who will testify
that they were all bollocksed and using the offending computer at
various times at the time the libellous comments were made.

Only an idiot would commence highly expensive legal proceedings in
such circumstances.

Mind you, the internet is replete with idiots so anything's possible.

Personally, from reading what I've read, he sounds like a little shit
who needs a thorough beating.............but if he denies everything
then any libel action would fail.

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 2:41:41 PM11/21/09
to
Gary Baldi <tim.ri...@gmx.com> wrote:

> Personally, from reading what I've read, he sounds like a little shit
> who needs a thorough beating.............but if he denies everything
> then any libel action would fail.

It wouldn't, actually. Not now he's left the electronic trail.

He posted a rather grovelling apology here, blaming it all on mental
depression.

And I *think* you ought to Google for Peter Parry's elegant summing-up
of Spacker's liability. It drew more admiring comments than *any*
posting I've get seen on upce.

Also, remember that Fran was Spacker's ally, attacking people left right
and centre, too.


--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com

Road_Hog

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 9:49:27 PM11/21/09
to

"The Older Gentleman" <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1j9jqlt.12sziq3148c3lyN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk...

> Gary Baldi <tim.ri...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> Personally, from reading what I've read, he sounds like a little shit
>> who needs a thorough beating.............but if he denies everything
>> then any libel action would fail.
>
> It wouldn't, actually. Not now he's left the electronic trail.
>
> He posted a rather grovelling apology here, blaming it all on mental
> depression.
>
> And I *think* you ought to Google for Peter Parry's elegant summing-up
> of Spacker's liability. It drew more admiring comments than *any*
> posting I've get seen on upce.
>
> Also, remember that Fran was Spacker's ally, attacking people left right
> and centre, too.
>

And you're a cunt, but there we go. What happened to all that bravado about
legal action from you?

All talk and no bollocks, did I mention you're a cunt?


Fran

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:52:54 AM11/22/09
to

"Road_Hog" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:hea8qk$oos$1...@aioe.org...

>
> "The Older Gentleman" <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1j9jqlt.12sziq3148c3lyN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk...
>> Gary Baldi <tim.ri...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Personally, from reading what I've read, he sounds like a little shit
>>> who needs a thorough beating.............but if he denies everything
>>> then any libel action would fail.
>>
>> It wouldn't, actually. Not now he's left the electronic trail.
>>
>> He posted a rather grovelling apology here, blaming it all on mental
>> depression.

*Someone* claiming to be him did that.

>>
>> And I *think* you ought to Google for Peter Parry's elegant summing-up
>> of Spacker's liability. It drew more admiring comments than *any*
>> posting I've get seen on upce.

You've a short memory.

>>
>> Also, remember that Fran was Spacker's ally, attacking people left right
>> and centre, too.
>>

Oh, get over it, do. You screwed over a seller and a buyer, I called you on
it - politely - and you took umbrage.

As to other so-called *attacks*, yes, I was offended, still am, by the pride
a few people took in their declared racism. I'd do that to their daft faces,
too. Indeed, I did a few days back in Plymouth.

>
> And you're a cunt, but there we go. What happened to all that bravado
> about legal action from you?
>
> All talk and no bollocks, did I mention you're a cunt?

I think the expression is willy waving, yes?


The Older Gentleman

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:40:32 AM11/22/09
to
Fran <autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote:

> >> Also, remember that Fran was Spacker's ally, attacking people left right
> >> and centre, too.
> >>
>
> Oh, get over it, do. You screwed over a seller and a buyer,

Ah, here we go again. No, I didn't. Leopards, spots, etc. And you were
quite happy to stitch up Petrolcan over his box listing, too.

> declared racism.

And again. Same old tune.

petrolcan

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:55:54 AM11/22/09
to
In article <1j9kw92.7bdowqsdgu28N%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk>, The
Older Gentleman says...

>
> Fran <autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Also, remember that Fran was Spacker's ally, attacking people left right
> > >> and centre, too.
> > >>
> >
> > Oh, get over it, do. You screwed over a seller and a buyer,
>
> Ah, here we go again. No, I didn't. Leopards, spots, etc. And you were
> quite happy to stitch up Petrolcan over his box listing, too.
>
> > declared racism.
>
> And again. Same old tune.

Let us not forget that fran has yet to condemn spacker for *anything*

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:14:32 AM11/22/09
to
petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Let us not forget that fran has yet to condemn spacker for *anything*

I know. I cannot for the life of me think what it's going on about when
it says I screwed over a seller and a buyer. If we're talking the twat
who tried to charge me �50 for collection, had false contact details,
and then got NARU'd, that'd account for the first, however inaccurate
the term 'screwed over' is. But the buyer?

<Checks FB.

Nope, no negs there. Not for two years, and that was a seller leaving
retaliatory FB.

Same old lies, then.

Road_Hog

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:08:27 PM11/22/09
to

"Fran" <autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
news:heb1lo$b8a$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

He may wave his willy about, but he doesn't seem to have a pair of bollocks
to go with it.


0 new messages