Message from discussion Lord McAlpine
Received: by 10.66.83.161 with SMTP id r1mr344766pay.28.1352208583875;
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 05:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.79.7 with SMTP id h7mr46717yhe.2.1352208583569; Tue, 06
Nov 2012 05:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: c16g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=188.8.131.52; posting-account=y24izwoAAACH4Qt6y-4Y6sTFkFcACtKO
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <afptlvFbv8tU2@mid.individual.net>
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0,gzip(gfe)
Subject: Re: Lord McAlpine
From: M Wicks <mwicks1...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:29:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Nov 6, 9:36=A0am, The Todal <deadmail...@beeb.net> wrote:
> On 5/11/12 16:01, Judith wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:05:55 -0800 (PST), M Wicks <mwicks1...@gmail.com>=
> >> On Nov 5, 1:57 pm, The Todal <deadmail...@beeb.net> wrote:
> >>> On 5/11/12 13:41, Judith wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:35:59 +0000, The Todal <deadmail...@beeb.net>=
> >>>>> On 5/11/12 13:14, Judith wrote:
> >>>>>> In the light of a recent rejection by ULM mods =A0- should the mod=
> >>>>>> make an announcement that posts with the words =A0"Lord McAlpine" =
in will always
> >>>>>> be rejected as they will be possibly defamatory.
> >>>>> I don't know. Don't sit on the fence, though. What's your advice?
> >>>> To be fair and consistent: Yes.
> >>>> Someone on the white list may make an innocuous post like I did whic=
h could be
> >>>> potentially defamatory.
> >>> I see we have already added McAlpine to the trigger words list. Great
> >>> minds think alike, Judith.
> >> Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. Real funny, Toadster.
> > To be fair : I think The Todal was not being sarcastic.
> Indeed not.
In that case I apologise.