Message from discussion Unfair rejection: "unconstructive"
Received: by 10.66.79.233 with SMTP id m9mr2462113pax.37.1353284464397;
Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:21:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Percy Picacity <k...@under.the.invalid>
Subject: Re: Unfair rejection: "unconstructive"
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:21:02 +0000
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
On 2012-11-18 21:50:54 +0000, John Benn said:
> "Andy Leighton" wrote in message news:email@example.com...
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:56:29 -0000, John Benn <MrBenn_use...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Rob Morley" wrote in message news:20121118161546.31ff79aa@hyperion...
>> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:34:43 -0000
>> "John Benn" <MrBenn_use...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Another bloody rejection for daring to disagree with a moderator!
>>> Unconstructive my arse! More like "I don't like you disagreeing with
>> Pointless repetition, failure to see the big picture. I'd reject that
>> Thanks Rob.
>> If I have missed the bigger picture, it would have been better to have had
>> that politely explained to me in the NG. I was convinced that Andy had
>> misunderstood me
> You were convinced. Rob and Percy Picacity seemed to understand my point.
> That when you include pedestrians, then drivers become a small majority of
> I am not prepared to discuss the topic here. This is not the right
> place and in URCM, my presence is obviously unwelcome based on your
> unjustified censorship of my perfectly reasonable post.
Since you raised the matter of the rejection here for discussion, this
seems an inconsistent position to take.