Received: by 10.66.79.233 with SMTP id m9mr2462113pax.37.1353284464397;
        Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: 6ni92420pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.alt.net
From: Percy Picacity <k...@under.the.invalid>
Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation
Subject: Re: Unfair rejection:  "unconstructive"
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:21:02 +0000
Organization: minimal
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <648jig.nvs.17.1@news.alt.net>
References: <k8ao5k$oe4$1@dont-email.me> <k8bl7u$mfa$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Unison/2.1.9
X-Received-Bytes: 2022
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2012-11-18 21:50:54 +0000, John Benn said:

> "Andy Leighton"  wrote in message news:slrnkai9n6.6lp.andyl@azaal.plus.com...
> 
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:56:29 -0000, John Benn <MrBenn_use...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Rob Morley"  wrote in message news:20121118161546.31ff79aa@hyperion...
>> 
>> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:34:43 -0000
>> "John Benn" <MrBenn_use...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Another bloody rejection for daring to disagree with a moderator!
>>> 
>>> Unconstructive my arse!  More like "I don't like you disagreeing with
>>> me".
>>> 
>>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~webstump/g.urcm/messages/nr-135318833126117.txt 
>>> 
>>> 
>> Pointless repetition, failure to see the big picture.  I'd reject that
>> post.
>> =============================
>> 
>> Thanks Rob.
>> 
>> If I have missed the bigger picture, it would have been better to have had
>> that politely explained to me in the NG.  I was convinced that Andy had
>> misunderstood me
> 
> You were convinced.  Rob and Percy Picacity seemed to understand my point.
> That when you include pedestrians, then drivers become a small majority of
> users.
> ==================================
> 
> I am not prepared to discuss the topic here.  This is not the right 
> place and in URCM, my presence is obviously unwelcome based on your 
> unjustified censorship of my perfectly reasonable post.

Since you raised the matter of the rejection here for discussion, this 
seems an inconsistent position to take.

-- 

Percy Picacity