Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Rob Morley <nos...@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config
Subject: Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated - RFD withdrawn
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:14:27 +0100
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <20110328001427.508f578e@bluemoon>
References: <uavuo6l1kkoo7lpkgmuq7g4ncogk8irfce@4ax.com>
	<8v9r97Fk4hU5@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Qo3qs3K9lAsZZrBqGvgxww6VILo65Ko01dVh76s57N9ai4uCI=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CXzUjAnQ1JfDdS7m9tKh2Iw6cbo=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu)

On 27 Mar 2011 22:16:07 GMT
Tony Raven <tra...@gotadsl.co.uk> wrote:

> however the moderators decide to moderate Is by definition within the
> Charter.
> 
It is the moderators' job to comply with the charter and make the group
run smoothly.  There's nothing that says they can change the basic
tenets of the charter just because it suits them.  The lack of
smoothness has been brought about by them blocking some pleasant
on-topic and interesting posts while allowing some unpleasant posts,
and by their making unhelpful or unpleasant remarks in email, rejection
messages and unn* groups.