The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.legal
From: s...@ssrl.org.uk (Sam Nelson)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:00:16 +0000
Local: Fri, Feb 8 2008 10:00 am
Subject: Re: Sharia Law
In article <613797F1tht8...@mid.individual.net>,
"Gaz" <gaz...@msn.com> writes: In a different sense from the men? One of the recent Aus Open women's semis > Paul Hyett wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 at 21:00:27, Gaz <gaz...@msn.com> wrote in > > uk.media.tv.misc : > >>> Of course, but there are ways of getting round the law, and it > >> I agree that on some occasions it might happen in certain situations, > >> Gaz > > Yes, when women play 5 set tennis matches, then they should expect > Piffle. The prize money is proportional to the amount of coverage and was a downright pointless 6-3 6-1 affair, and the final was a straight-sets win. If it's tennis-related entertainment that counts, as against cheesecake underwear shots, doubles tournaments should be attracting the big prize money. > and a time Tennis is past it anyway. They need a rule change to make it interesting > may come where women tennis players can command a higher pay level then the > mens tounaments. again. I've heard it suggested that they should do away with the second serve, but I reckon just making the service boxes shorter (half a metre or so) would do it. -- SAm. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||