Much speculation on DS and elsewhere that this was planned and that she had only signed up for a week.
Not sure it really matters, but I've always been anti- this kind of conspiracy-theorising...but now I'm not so sure. Has she just been toying with us yet again?
Ian F. wrote: > Much speculation on DS and elsewhere that this was planned and that she > had only signed up for a week.
> Not sure it really matters, but I've always been anti- this kind of > conspiracy-theorising...but now I'm not so sure. Has she just been > toying with us yet again?
On 23 nov, 13:54, "Ian F." <wowfabgro...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I purposely put both ways of referring to the show in the subject line so > that those who are not interested can use the thread to inform everyone that they are not interested in the thread.
>> I purposely put both ways of referring to the show in the subject line so >> that those who are not interested can use the thread to inform everyone >> that they are not interested in the thread.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:03 -0000, Ian F. <wowfabgro...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Much speculation on DS and elsewhere that this was planned and that she > had only signed up for a week.
> Not sure it really matters, but I've always been anti- this kind of > conspiracy-theorising...but now I'm not so sure. Has she just been > toying with us yet again?
I suspect that finding out what the British public really think of her has given her a bit of a shock and she really has flounced out.
>> I suspect that finding out what the British public really think of >> her has given her a bit of a shock and she really has flounced out.
> I guess she'll be back in a few weeks then. After having been working > on her next book and caring for her disabled child for a bit. > Cheers > Jeff
Ian F. wrote: > Much speculation on DS and elsewhere that this was planned and that she > had only signed up for a week.
> Not sure it really matters, but I've always been anti- this kind of > conspiracy-theorising...but now I'm not so sure. Has she just been > toying with us yet again?
I think probably so, or at the very least the production company will have conveniently "forgotten" to write a penalty clause in to her contract.
Regardless I'm glad she's gone. IMO it was simply unfair to bring in a celeb who had done IACGMOOH before, although I'm sure commercially it was a canny decision.
> Regardless I'm glad she's gone. IMO it was simply unfair to bring in a > celeb who had done IACGMOOH before, although I'm sure commercially it was > a canny decision.
|
