Saying Jews Run the Media Is Hateful?
Bob Sims
what I wrote in a similar article.
The Jews boast openly about their control of the western media.
And you will notice the pathetic and arrogant denial from another
poster who says that people who claim such a thing are just
"uninformed". Pretty well par for the course !
The take over and gleeful dragging into the gutter of Disney is
something which I personally regard with deep hatered.
Bob Sims.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Alex Vange <va...@i1.net> wrote in message
news:uwDT5.10$uP1.2...@news1.i1.net...
>
>
> http://stormfront.org
> "Kenneth McVay, OBC" <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
> news:8vi18d$30eo$1...@news.tht.net...
> >
> > Actually, to state that Jews run the media makes one an uninformed
> > speaker
>
>
> There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their
> Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran Hollywood.
>
> Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment". It
is
> subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are from the Aug
> 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?":
>
> "It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power
> and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential
> pruduction executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a
> heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
>
> "the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney,
a
> gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic attitudes, now
> features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions."
>
> The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner. On
> studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
>
> "When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to undermine
the
> unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and all Jewish -
> management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and Tom Pollack."
>
> Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media and
Rule
> America"
>
> "American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Coumbia Broadcasting System
> (CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these three has
been
> under the absolute control of a single man over a long enough period of
> time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff the corporation at
every
> level with officers of his choosing and then to place his imprint
indelibly
> upon it. In each case that man has been a Jew.
> "Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities Communications,
> Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer
> (CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a Jew...In an interview
in
> the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek, Goldenson boasted 'I built this
company
> (ABC) from scratch.'"
>
> "CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than
half
> a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
>
> "There has been no move by top G-E management to change the Jewish
> "profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personel. To the contrary, new
> Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve Friedman..."
>
> "The man in charge of the television entertainment division at CBS
is
> Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly
> all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of reality, of good and
> evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior are Jews. In particular,
> Sagansky and Bloomberg arre Jews. So is Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only
> Gentile who has had a significant role in TV entertainment programming in
> recent years."
>
> "American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment companies
> and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross, Jew) Walt
Disney
> Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top entertainment CEOs listed
> above, eight are Jews."
>
> "The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a lack
of
> real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also illustrates the
> insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of opinion... The
> Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several large and important
> ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the
> New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's largest trade book publishing
> conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsideries; Newhouse
> Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87
> cable-TV systems, including some of the countries largest cable networks-
> the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million
> copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker,
> Vogue, Madamoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's
> Quarterly, Self, Home&Garden...."
>
> "Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
> management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
>
> "the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post.
> These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidlines for nearly
> all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't, at
> national and international levels. They originate the news; the others
> merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands...The
Suzberger
> family also owns, through the New York Times Co. 36 other newspapers;
twelve
> magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle..."
>
> "New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the Daily
> News. The New York Post is owned by billionare Jewish real-estate
developer
> Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard
Stern,
> the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
>
> "There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United
> States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO of Time
> Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
> "Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post
> Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
> "U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate
> developer Mortimer B. Zucherman..."
>
> " The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster
> , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled by Jews...The
> CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the president is Jeremy
> Kaplan; both are Jews too."
>
> "Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of childrens books,
with
> more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard
> Bernstein, a Jew."
>
> "Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
> isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
>
> "We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on
our
> political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving
> them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
>
>
Paul Hyett
view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>So here is some more proof for Phil Stovel in alt.politics.misc of
>what I wrote in a similar article.
>
>The Jews boast openly about their control of the western media.
Playing devils advocate for a minute :
Even supposing you are right - I couldn't give a shit, it doesn't affect
me in any discernible way.
>
>The take over and gleeful dragging into the gutter of Disney is
>something which I personally regard with deep hatered.
>
Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
--
Paul 'US Sitcom Fan' Hyett - The Wild Frame Grabber of the Net!
Website at http://www.activist.demon.co.uk/USsitcoms/
james mcconnell
"bambi does dallas" and "the devil in miss minnie" :)
jamie
--
(remove any weapons to reply)
"you can poison my cat baby i don't care
but if you talk in the movies i'll kill you right there"
its the little things
alice cooper-brutal planet
Paul Hyett <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:vNpdP3Ah...@activist.demon.co.uk...
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Bob Sims <B...@bscserv.com> stated this considered
> view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>
> >So here is some more proof for Phil Stovel in alt.politics.misc of
> >what I wrote in a similar article.
> >
> >The Jews boast openly about their control of the western media.
>
> Playing devils advocate for a minute :
>
> Even supposing you are right - I couldn't give a shit, it doesn't affect
> me in any discernible way.
> >
> >The take over and gleeful dragging into the gutter of Disney is
> >something which I personally regard with deep hatered.
> >
David Gehrig
> Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
> subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
Yes, haven't you heard? The Jews have taken over Disney, and
they have renamed the characters "Mischa Mouse" and "Dovidl Duck."
"Goofy" they just removed two letters of: "Goy."
---
david gehrig's self-referential .sigfile has seven a's, two c's,
five d's, thirty-two e's, ten f's, five g's, nine h's, seventeen
i's, six l's, nineteen n's, ten o's, two p's, ten r's, thirty-three
s's, twenty-four t's, five u's, eight v's, seven w's, two x's,
four y's, all sorts of punctuation, and ends with these: @%<
Bob Sims
Paul Hyett <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:vNpdP3Ah...@activist.demon.co.uk...
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Bob Sims <B...@bscserv.com> stated this considered
> view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>
> >what I wrote in a similar article.
> >
> >The Jews boast openly about their control of the western media.
>
>
> Even supposing you are right - I couldn't give a shit, it doesn't affect
> me in any discernible way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
If you think that - you are even more stupid than I think you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> >
> >The take over and gleeful dragging into the gutter of Disney is
> >something which I personally regard with deep hatered.
> >
> Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
> subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
> --
> Paul
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The answer to your question is - yes, of course they bloody
well are !
Without going (again, and again and again) through the whole
bloody catalogue of post-Disney "Disney's" - you will perhaps
recall that there has for some years been a boycott of Disney
films by 10 million American christians.
And that is for a reason.
And it could not have failed to miss even your attention that
there has been uproar over the lying propaganda films out
of Hollywood claiming six historical events in which they
have changed history to strip the credit from Britain and give
it to Americans ?
Including the capture of the Enigma machine by the Royal
Navy from a German submarine.
The British could not be represented as the hero's that they
are - now could they ?
How would that fit in with their constant stream of anti
Anglo-Saxon propaganda ?
Britain and the British, as the internationally identified home
of the Anglo-Saxon people, must always be represented as
scoundrels by these evil bastards who see us as the only
obstacle remaining in their way.
Your "blind spots" don't fool anybody, Paul.
Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Website at http://www.activist.demon.co.uk/USsitcoms/
>
>
>
>
james mcconnell
no-one is rewriting history, just making movies. i mean, do you actually
believe that aliens have attac....wait, scrap that, you probably do.
jamie
--
(remove any weapons to reply)
"you can poison my cat baby i don't care
but if you talk in the movies i'll kill you right there"
its the little things
alice cooper-brutal planet
Bob Sims <B...@bscserv.com> wrote in message
news:975267374.23013.0...@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> Paul Hyett <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:vNpdP3Ah...@activist.demon.co.uk...
> > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Bob Sims <B...@bscserv.com> stated this considered
> > view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
> >
> > >So here is some more proof for Phil Stovel in alt.politics.misc of
> > >what I wrote in a similar article.
> > >
> > >The Jews boast openly about their control of the western media.
> >
> > Playing devils advocate for a minute :
> >
> > Even supposing you are right - I couldn't give a shit, it doesn't affect
> > me in any discernible way.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---
>
> If you think that - you are even more stupid than I think you are.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> > >
> > >The take over and gleeful dragging into the gutter of Disney is
> > >something which I personally regard with deep hatered.
> > >
Rich Egan
> So here is some more proof for Phil Stovel in alt.politics.misc of
> what I wrote in a similar article.
>
> The Jews boast openly about their control of the western media.
The Jews are of two minds on this , Those
who will deny it inspite of the most undeniable
evidence . And those who will Candidly admit
it . One of which was Ben Stein . He will admit,
Yes the Jews run Hollywood ! and most of the
Print and electronic media.
>
> And you will notice the pathetic and arrogant denial from another
> poster who says that people who claim such a thing are just
> "uninformed". Pretty well par for the course !
"Uniformed" is a Liberal Code word for "He's
not agreeing with me !"
>
> The take over and gleeful dragging into the gutter of Disney is
> something which I personally regard with deep hatered.
Good For you! Now there's at least two of us !
You'll be pleaed to know that the Southern Baptists
boycotted him. Eisner laughed , and Disney's
income went down 40% in one year. With luck.
we'll drive this bastard out of business .
Regards
Rich
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Rich Egan
Paul Hyett <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:vNpdP3Ah...@activist.demon.co.uk...
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Bob Sims <B...@bscserv.com> stated this considered
> view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>
> >what I wrote in a similar article.
> >
> >The Jews boast openly about their control of the western media.
>
>
> Even supposing you are right - I couldn't give a shit, it doesn't affect
> me in any discernible way.
Thats the problem Paul , You're not discerning it .
It's subtle, not overt , It shades things and events
it doesn't recolor them. If you're not on to it , you
miss it , but your friends will notice your attitudinal
changes. Are the messages subliminal ?No
they are subtle and often repeated to be Truth as
you know it. Like the "holocaust " which was taken
from a tradgedy to a National Industry. Jews
everywhere, and Israel in particular, are more
protective of their tribal myths than Japan is
of it's industries. Jews have even gotten the US
taxpayers to finance a "Holocaust " Museum
to advance their "cult of sympathy" and inflict
guilt on non jews .
Rich Egan
David Gehrig <zem...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3A213F5F...@earthlink.net...
> Paul Hyett wrote:
>
> > Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
> > subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
>
> they have renamed the characters "Mischa Mouse" and "Dovidl Duck."
> "Goofy" they just removed two letters of: "Goy."
Thats funny, but it's not how they work. They would
never change the names of two recognisable money
makers.They would subtly change the messages of
these characters to say what they want the little
Goyim to believe . This would never be done suddenly
or abruptly , it would be shaded, with an emphasis
on the right character saying the right, or wrong thing.
Much the way that lovable old ignoramus , Archie
Bunker, would refer to "Yer Hebes and Spooks"!
Because we knew that Arch was such a Dope, we
laughed at him, but wouldn't have been caught dead
repeating him, We were being trained in Norman
Lear's "How Not To Be a Racist 101 " Jewish
obediance class. Sadly, the lessons took and
many people lost their ability to discern reality.
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Rich Egan <rich...@mindspring.com> wrote:
[...]
> The Jews are of two minds on this , Those
> who will deny it inspite of the most undeniable
>evidence . And those who will Candidly admit
>it . One of which was Ben Stein . He will admit,
>Yes the Jews run Hollywood ! and most of the
>Print and electronic media.
Yet another anti-White moron rears his hate-filled head out of the
slime....
"The Jews control the media!"
"The Jews control the media!"
"The Jews control the media!"
..... but what this foolish mantra is really saying is this:
"White people are too stupid to think for themselves."
"White people are too stupid to acquire capital, or invest in the media."
The same morons who contend that White people are near-terminal in
their stupidity, and completely incapable of using their minds, also
reinforce this hatemongering hysteria by insisting that
"The Jews control the government!"
"The Jews control the government!"
"The Jews control the government!"
.... which is, of course, clear evidence that they also believe that
"White people are too stupid to govern themselves!"
.... having already told White folks that they're too stupid to think
for themselves, or govern themselves, they feel compelled to add
insult to injury by insisting that
"The Jews control the monetary system!"
"The Jews control the monetary system!"
"The Jews control the monetary system!"
.... which means, it is obvious, that
"White people are too stupid to manage their own money!"
As if these things were not enough, these "white racialists" that
"love White people" also say:
"The Holocaust is a hoax!"
"The Holocaust is a hoax!"
"The Holocaust is a hoax!"
.... which means that they believe a people who represent less than 2%
of the entire world's population have duped not only every _white_ person
in the world, but indeed every _other_ person as well! How's _that_
for "You folks are REALLY stupid"?
.... and yet the authors of these gratuitous racial slurs continue to
insist ("nudge nudge, wink wink...") that they are "advocates for
White people!
Go figger.
--
The Nizkor Project - An electronic Holocaust educational resource
David Irving, Holocaust denial, and his connections to Right-Wing
Extremists and Neo-Nazism in Germany:
http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/hweb/people/f/funke-hajo/
Ian F.
<turgid, ill-informed, racist twaddle>
Would someone please be good enough to refrain from posting any more of
this shite in uk.media.tv.misc? Any other umtm-ers agree?
Ian
--
~Take Jennifer Aniston out before you e-mail me~
"If you drink, don't drive. Don't even putt."
(Dean Martin)
HeyHeyVk
this shite in uk.media.tv.misc? Any other umtm-ers agree?<<<
Yes. 100%.
David Gehrig
>
> David Gehrig <zem...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:3A213F5F...@earthlink.net...
> > Paul Hyett wrote:
> >
> > > Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
> > > subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
> >
> > Yes, haven't you heard? The Jews have taken over Disney, and
> > they have renamed the characters "Mischa Mouse" and "Dovidl Duck."
> > "Goofy" they just removed two letters of: "Goy."
>
> Thats funny, but it's not how they work. They would
> never change the names of two recognisable money
> makers.They would subtly change the messages of
> these characters to say what they want the little
> Goyim to believe .
Ah, so that's why the 101 Dalmations are black and white --
the Jews are subliminally promoting race mixing.
Paul Hyett
considered view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>
>Lear's "How Not To Be a Racist 101 " Jewish
>obediance class.
Anyone with more than half a brain cell doesn't need to be trained 'not
to be a racist' - they can see that judging people purely on superficial
differences, or on stereotypes, is wrong.
Paul Hyett
view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>> >
>>
>>
>> Even supposing you are right - I couldn't give a shit, it doesn't affect
>> me in any discernible way.
>
>
>If you think that - you are even more stupid than I think you are.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you care to explain that?
Since I've never had a prejudice against the Jews for as long as I can
remember, any 'propaganda' they put out would have no effect.
Besides, given the amount of anti-Semitism around the world, can you
blame them for wanting to counter that?
>> >
>> Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
>> subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The answer to your question is - yes, of course they bloody
>well are !
Impossible, since most people now have freeze-frame VCR's.
>
>Without going (again, and again and again) through the whole
>bloody catalogue of post-Disney "Disney's" - you will perhaps
>recall that there has for some years been a boycott of Disney
>films by 10 million American christians.
I cannot 'recall' something I never knew about.
>
>And that is for a reason.
Which is?
>
>And it could not have failed to miss even your attention that
>there has been uproar over the lying propaganda films out
>of Hollywood claiming six historical events in which they
>have changed history to strip the credit from Britain and give
>it to Americans ?
>
Oh come on, they are just movies. History itself is set, it CANNOT be
changed.
>
>How would that fit in with their constant stream of anti
>Anglo-Saxon propaganda ?
What anti-Anglo-Saxon propaganda? We need no help to recognise that we
have done things, that with hindsight, we cannot be proud of. At the
time however, they were regarded as perfectly acceptable.
I have no doubt that in a century or two, the current obsession with
race will be regarded with exactly the same contempt.
>
>Your "blind spots" don't fool anybody, Paul.
You have a blind spot that prevents you recognising that people that
oppose you have a legitimate pov, and especially that they might be
right & you wrong.
Regards,
Paul Hyett
considered view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>> >
>>
>>
>> Even supposing you are right - I couldn't give a shit, it doesn't affect
>> me in any discernible way.
>
A comment I expected from someone like you.
>It's subtle, not overt , It shades things and events
>it doesn't recolor them.
That's an easy claim to make, but impossible to prove : there is
virtually no difference between 'extremely subtle' and 'non-existent'.
IMO the latter is the case.
> Like the "holocaust " which was taken
>from a tradgedy to a National Industry.
ANYTHING which prevents such a tragedy from happening again, cannot be a
bad thing!
>Jews
>everywhere, and Israel in particular, are more
>protective of their tribal myths than Japan is
>of it's industries. Jews have even gotten the US
>taxpayers to finance a "Holocaust " Museum
>to advance their "cult of sympathy" and inflict
>guilt on non jews .
I don't feel guilty for the Holocaust - why should I, I wasn't even born
until the 60's. All I feel is a deep regret that it happened, and a
determination that it should never happen again. That's why I oppose
people like you, whose anti-Semitism led directly to it in the first
place! :(
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Paul Hyett <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
[a very warped person asked...]
>>How would that fit in with their constant stream of anti
>>Anglo-Saxon propaganda ?
>What anti-Anglo-Saxon propaganda? We need no help to recognise that we
>have done things, that with hindsight, we cannot be proud of. At the
>time however, they were regarded as perfectly acceptable.
The anti-Anglo-Saxon propaganda works like this:
The anti-Anglo-Saxon racist makes claims which demonstrate that
Anglo-Saxons are very stupid.
For instance, our racist will claim that Wascally Jews control the
media, which clearly implies that Anglo-Saxons are too stupid to think
for themselves.
Or he might claim that Wascally Jews control the government, which
clearly implies that Anglo-Saxons are also too stupid to govern
themselves.
...or he might make the claim that Wascally Jews control the monetary
supply, which obviously is another way of telling us that Anglo-Saxons
are too stupid to control their own monetary affairs.
It is difficult to assess the motivation behind such ugly
anti-Anglo-Saxon propaganda without being a bit of a mystic. On the
one hand, the AAS<tm> agitators _here_ seem to devote inordinate
amounts of time and energy praising Jews... after all, making all of
the claims above (and the typical AAS does, day in and day out) would
tend to suggest that these folks adore the Jews, and view them as the
only folks on the planet capable of walking and chewing gum at the
same time. And yet the AAS also claims to "hate" the Jews, or, in many
cases, the elusive "Zionist," as in "I don't hate Jews, just
Zionists." When queried, of course, they readily admit that they
believe 99% of all Jews are Zionists, so using the Zionist dodge
simply becomes one _more_ way of telling Anglo-Saxons how stupid they
are.
I don't see these AAS racists as much of a problem, however, as it
seems to me that Anglo-Saxons can take care of themselves when it
comes to sweeping up the gutter trash from time to time.
--
"Denial of Science & The Science of Denial"
The Techniques of Holocaust Denial
http://www.nizkor.org/features/techniques-of-denial
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Richard Bell <Richar...@eei.ericsson.se> wrote:
[...]
>Jews ARE White!!!!! Well a lot of them anyway. Being Jewish does not
>make non-white!!
You know that, and _I_ know that, but the nazi activists insist it
isn't true.
Not only that (coffee alert) -- several net.nazis (see references,
below) have insisted that a White person can _become_ Jewish, and thus
non-White, through the simple expedient of confronting racists on the
net!
These folks aren't, after all, the brightest lights on the tree...
One such lame-brain is Canada's George "Find a woman half your size
and kick her in the face" Burdi, sometimes known as "The Noble Aryan
Stomper of Women."
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/burdi-george
vileness Fats
is not a jewish thing, its an american thing.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"james mcconnell" <zomb...@horrorfan.ANYWEAPONSfsnet.co.uk> wrote in
message news:8vrqee$vn7$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
> they are JUST FILMS (gasp!!)
> no-one is rewriting history, just making movies. i mean, do you actually
> believe that aliens have attac....wait, scrap that, you probably do.
> jamie
>
Most movies are leftist propaganda, and movies about history especially
filled with it. The movies that told the truth were made in NS Germany. My
favorite is Hitlerjunge Quex.
Kenneth McVay, OBC
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
[...]
> Most movies are leftist propaganda, and movies about history especially
>filled with it. The movies that told the truth were made in NS Germany. My
>favorite is Hitlerjunge Quex.
Perhaps Mr. Vangel can provide us with citations to studies which
have come to such conclusions?
Don't hold your breath, folks... Mr. Vangel's record when it comes
to supporting his blather is a sorry one.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Kenneth McVay, OBC" <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:8vs1sm$2a2b$1...@news.tht.net...
>
> Yet another anti-White moron rears his hate-filled head out of the
> slime....
>
> "The Jews control the media!"
> "The Jews control the media!"
> "The Jews control the media!"
>
> ..... but what this foolish mantra is really saying is this:
>
> "White people are too stupid to think for themselves."
No, it only says that Jews control the media. Most people might think
about your conclusion but then dismiss it as nonsense. After all, if there
was any logic to it you would explain it wouldn't you?
> "White people are too stupid to acquire capital, or invest in the media."
It's true that Whites are not as greedy as Jews.
>
> The same morons who contend that White people are near-terminal in
> their stupidity, and completely incapable of using their minds, also
> reinforce this hatemongering hysteria by insisting that
>
> "The Jews control the government!"
> "The Jews control the government!"
> "The Jews control the government!"
They do.
>
> .... which is, of course, clear evidence that they also believe that
>
> "White people are too stupid to govern themselves!"
There is no such evidence. White nations were doing great before the Jews
were allowed in. The Jews don't want the White race to live.
>
> .... having already told White folks that they're too stupid to think
> for themselves, or govern themselves, they feel compelled to add
> insult to injury by insisting that
>
> "The Jews control the monetary system!"
> "The Jews control the monetary system!"
> "The Jews control the monetary system!"
They do.
>
> .... which means, it is obvious, that
>
> "White people are too stupid to manage their own money!"
No, this is what it means:
Here is a quote from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published in
1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite evident
reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage in the
persuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed a
great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of opportunity left
open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning they developed a certain
cruelty and greed. That was natural. The world was cruel to them, so when
the chance was theirs, they were cruel in return..."
The money system we have today is called the debt-money system. It
is evil and needs to be replaced. The only way money comes into existance
today is when it is borrowed. There is no fiixed money supply, but only
borrowed money that needs to be paid back to bankers with interest. If all
the money that was owed to bankers was ever paid back there would be no
money left in circulation and this would be a great depression. What makes
matters even worse is that when money is created only the principle of the
loan is created. The money needed to pay the interest is never created. For
this reason it is impossible to pay back the principle plus the interest on
all of the loans that make up our money supply. The extra amount of money
needed to pay the interest was never created and does not exist.
The United States government borrows money from the Federal Reserve
Bank. This bank is not federal but owned by private stockholders. Other
banks also create the money in our money supply. They are allowed to loan
out much more money then they actually have. Thus they create new money. No
one else is allowed to create money, only bankers have this privilege. All
of our money is debt-money and it is all owed back to bankers, plus the
interest.
In the U.S.A. money is created by the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing which is a unit of the treasury, but the orders to print come from
the Federal Reserve Banks. The money is created for and owned by the banks.
And the Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal, in spite of the name.
Privately owned commercial banks own the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks.
The Federal Reserve Banks give the newly created money to the government in
exchange for government bonds. To simplify: The United States does not make
its own money. Bankers create the money and loan it to the United States
with an interest charge.
The book War Cycles Peace Cycles puts it this way:
"If there is only $10 in existance, and you lend it to someone under
the condition that he repay $11, and if he agrees to this, he has agreed to
the impossible."
The book The Struggle forWorld Power put it this way:
"The Bank of England... was the first payment institution which was
legally empowered to issue state-authorized paper currency and , therefore,
the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not only renounced
its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to borrow the
privately-created money from the bankers...Not only the thing being done,
but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and deception to conceal the
essence of the deed. To create money out of nothing is to make valid and
effective claim on all goods and services for no return, which is fraud and
theft, made worse by the circumstances that the money is lent out at
interest...it follows that those who have the power to 'create' out of
nothing all the money in each country and the whole world and lend it as
stated, have total power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press,
individuals and so on. Therefore the power of Parliment in general, and
especially with regard to money, is non-existant, and all the true
sovereignty is in the hands of those private individuals who issue all
money"
>
> As if these things were not enough, these "white racialists" that
> "love White people" also say:
>
> "The Holocaust is a hoax!"
> "The Holocaust is a hoax!"
> "The Holocaust is a hoax!"
>
> .... which means that they believe a people who represent less than 2%
> of the entire world's population have duped not only every _white_ person
> in the world, but indeed every _other_ person as well! How's _that_
> for "You folks are REALLY stupid"?
People who control the media have a lot of power. The same goes for the
money.
>
> .... and yet the authors of these gratuitous racial slurs continue to
> insist ("nudge nudge, wink wink...") that they are "advocates for
> White people!
>
> Go figger.
>
We are for preserving the White race.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Richard Bell" <Richar...@eei.ericsson.se> wrote in message
news:3A229EC7...@eei.ericsson.se...
>
> Jews ARE White!!!!! Well a lot of them anyway. Being Jewish does not
> make non-white!!
>
Jews may be technically White but they are not considered one of us
because they are known enemies of White civilization.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither Reform
or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there was
Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of Israel than
most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born in Germany in
1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not himself reared as a
Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized a Christian by his
father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him thoughout his days, for
he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby, Gabriel
Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish lineage
played important roles in the struggle that went thoughout Europe in this
period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being waged, whether in
France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there the Jew was to be found.
It was little wonder that the enemies of social progress, the monarchists
and the Churchmen, came to speak of the whole liberal movement as nothing
but a Jewish plot."
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Kenneth McVay, OBC" <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:8vuc3d$17rt$1...@news.tht.net...
> In article <3A229EC7...@eei.ericsson.se>,
> Richard Bell <Richar...@eei.ericsson.se> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >Jews ARE White!!!!! Well a lot of them anyway. Being Jewish does not
> >make non-white!!
>
> You know that, and _I_ know that, but the nazi activists insist it
> isn't true.
>
> Not only that (coffee alert) -- several net.nazis (see references,
> below) have insisted that a White person can _become_ Jewish, and thus
> non-White, through the simple expedient of confronting racists on the
> net!
>
> These folks aren't, after all, the brightest lights on the tree...
We are for preserving the White race. The Jews are opposed to this,
except of course for themselves. They can have their Jew country and
Americans can give them billions of dollars to have it. But any suggestion
that it might be OK to have a nation for White people is what they are
fighting against.
Alex Vange
"Paul Hyett" <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:phLckTAp...@activist.demon.co.uk...
>
> Anyone with more than half a brain cell doesn't need to be trained 'not
> to be a racist' - they can see that judging people purely on superficial
> differences, or on stereotypes, is wrong.
by Thomas Jackson
There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater horror
than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is
thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press and public have become
so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most
spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of
American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off. For example, when a White
Georgetown Law School student reported earlier this year that black students
are not as qualified as White students, it set off a booming, national
controversy about "racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he
would have attracted far less attention and criticism.
Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full alert
for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach against it,
America is said to be racked with it, but just what is racism?
Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word.
They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock is superior
to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race.
When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this.
Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding
what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the
current dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal. Despite clear evidence to
the contrary, all races have been declared to be equally talented and hard-
working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely
wrong but evil.
The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If blacks,
for example, are equal to Whites in every way, what accounts for their
poverty, criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of racial
differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black
failure is White racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone,
and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism. Nothing else
could be keeping them in such an abject state.
All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic. Any
explanation for black failure that does not depend on White wickedness
threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences.
Thus, even if today's Whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress
blacks, yesterday's Whites must have oppressed them. If Whites do not
consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them Unconsciously. If no
obviously racist individuals can be identified, then societal institutions
must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America, there
simply must be millions of White people we do not know about, who are
working day and night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality
leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some
fashion, an indictment of White people.
The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to believe
that the only explanation for non-White failure is White racism, every time
a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, White
society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or
misbehavior by non-Whites is standing proof that White society is riddled
with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed
in life at exactly the same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition,
thwarting and oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to
strange conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be
committed almost exclusively by White people. Indeed, a black congressman
from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit,
have argued that only White people can be racist. Likewise, in 1987, the
affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued a
company pamphlet in which she explained that all Whites are racist and that
only Whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained
without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?
Although some blacks and liberal Whites concede that non-Whites can,
perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-Whites have been forced
into it as self-defense because of centuries of White oppression. What
appears to be non-White racism is so understandable and forgivable that it
hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not an act is called racism
depends on the race of the racist. What would surely be called racism when
done by Whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The reverse
is also true.
Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost tedious
to list them: When a White man kills a black man and uses the word "nigger"
while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and the nation beats its
collective breast; when members of the black Yahweh cult carry out ritual
murders of random Whites, the media are silent (see AR of March, 1991).
College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-Whites as "racist,"
but ignore scurrilous attacks on Whites.
At election time, if 60 percent of the White voters vote for a White
candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for the black opponent,
it is Whites who are accused of racial bias. There are 107 "historically
black" colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name
of diversity, but all historically White colleges must be forcibly
integrated in the name of... the same thing. To resist would be racist.
"Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything that
could be construed as an expression of White pride is a form of hatred. It
is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect school instruction
and driver's tests in their own languages, whereas for native Americans to
ask them to learn English is racist.
Blatant anti-White prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is now the
law of the land. Anything remotely like affirmative action, if practiced in
favor of Whites, would be attacked as despicable favoritism.
All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs and caucuses are
thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club or
association expressly for Whites is by definition racist. The National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly
for black advantage but is a respected "civil rights" organization. The
National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) campaigns
merely for equal treatment of all races, but is said to be viciously racist.
At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action have set
up student unions for Whites, analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, etc,
and have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the White
students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a
minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones that
non-Whites have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed, in America today,
any club not specifically formed to be a White enclave but whose members
simply happen all to be White is branded as racist.
Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality of
American racism is "celebration of diversity." It has begun to dawn on a few
people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of Whites (and
sometimes men), and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howard
University be made more diverse by admitting Whites, Hispanics, or Asians.
No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University in San Jose (CA)
would benefit from the diversity of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one
suggests that the Black Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the
NAACP or the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from
a lack of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to
celebrate homogeneity. And yet any all-White group - a company, a town, a
school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to suffer from a crippling lack
of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as possible. Only when Whites
have been reduced to a minority has "diversity" been achieved.
Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we are so
often asked to do, is no different from deploring an excess of Whites. In
fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess of Whites. Our
current immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90 percent
of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-White. The several million
illegal immigrants that enter the country every year are virtually all
non-White. It would be racist not to be grateful for this laudable
contribution to "diversity." It is, of course, only White nations that are
called upon to practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to
imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant dispossession of
this kind.
What if the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated citizens
across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into thinking that
Mexico was being "culturally enriched?" What if the state of Chihuahua were
losing its majority population to poor Whites who demanded that schools be
taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of July, who
demanded the right to vote even if they weren't citizens, who clamored for
"affirmative action" in jobs and schooling?
Would Mexico - or any other non-White nation - tolerate this kind of
cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet White Americans are
supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians entering their
country as a priceless cultural gift. They are supposed to "celebrate" their
own loss of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own dispossession,
for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist.
There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non- Whites
advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of "hating"
another group. Blacks can join "civil rights" groups and Hispanics can be
activists without fear of being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can
agitate openly for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of
whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds without anyone
ever suggesting that they are "anti-white."
Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to affirmative
action to be called haters. They need only subject racial policies that are
clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called racists. Should they actually
go so far as to say that they prefer the company of their own kind, that
they wish to be left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage,
they are irredeemably wicked and hateful.
Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race
relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the company of their own
kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct from those of
the whole, and to work openly for group advantage. None of this is thought
to be racist. At the same time, whites must also champion the racial
interests of non-whites. They must sacrifice their own future on the altar
of "diversity" and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to
encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European people and
culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in the simplest possible
terms, White people are cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit
racial and cultural suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.
Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United States is perfectly
natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to love one's people
and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are
doubtless astonished to discover that simply by setting foot in the United
States they are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born
whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them? Is it surprising that
they should want their languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters
to take possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the
once-great people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and
is prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for
it, why should Mexicans and Cambodians complain?
No, it is the White enterprise in the United States that is unnatural,
unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let themselves be
convinced that it is racist merely to object to dispossession, much less to
work for their own interests. Never in the history of the world has a
dominant people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its
wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that
there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away
to others its place in history. Of all the races in America, only whites
have been tricked into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is
racism. Only whites are ever told that a love for their own people is
somehow "hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their
own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men love their families
more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they hate their
neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no ill will towards
non-whites. They only wish to be left alone to participate in the unfolding
of their racial and cultural destinies.
What whites in America are being asked to do is therefore utterly unnatural.
They are being asked to devote themselves to the interests of other races
and to ignore the interests of their own. This is like asking a man to
forsake his own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do
otherwise would be "racist."
What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any dictionary is
likely to say. It is any opposition by whites to official policies of racial
preference for non-whites. It is any preference by whites for their own
people and culture. It is any resistance by whites to the idea of becoming a
minority people. It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in
short, any of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined
nations since the beginning of history - but only so long as the aspirations
are those of whites.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Paul Hyett" <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:yB3asUAb...@activist.demon.co.uk...
> Since I've never had a prejudice against the Jews for as long as I can
> remember, any 'propaganda' they put out would have no effect.
>
> Besides, given the amount of anti-Semitism around the world, can you
> blame them for wanting to counter that?
For one thing the Jews were behind Communism:
Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.
In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party during
the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:
"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception of the
four who had recieved the largest number of votes. Lenin--133 out of a
possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."
Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile but he was married to a
Jewess. It was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.
The communists took over Hungary in 1919. Their leader was the Jew,
Bela Kun (Cohen).
The leaders of communist Poland were the Jews Minc, Skryeszewski,
Modzelewski, and Berman.
The leader of communist Roumania was the Jewess Anna Pauker
The leader of communist Chechoslovakia was the Jew Rudolf Slansky.
The leader of communist Yogoslavia was not a Jew. He was Tito,
however he was tutored by a Jewish mentor named Mosa Pljade.
Communism in America was also Jewish.
In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the Amerasia
case they were:
Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at one
time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the ringleader of
the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.
The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party in the
U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.
In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers of
the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress and
sentanced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten were
communist party members and the other four were flagrantly pro-communist.
One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of the
American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three nationality
unknown.
Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was convicted
for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on information obtained
from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of the ring. All of them were
convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.
The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from the
U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominant in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."
State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."
From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomey Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type"
type."
A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 `commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.
David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a
January 1918 dispatch to Washington: "The Bolshevik leaders here, most
of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care
little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and
they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution."
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920)> "There is much in the fact of Bolshevism
itself, in the fact that so
many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with
many of the highest ideals of Judaism." (Jewish Chronicle, London
April, 4, 1919) "Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism." (The
American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935).
"In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
the total population." (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to
read articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous stuff.
From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I recalled to mind the
names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then I realized that most of
them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social Democratic representatives in
the Imperial Cabinet as well as the secretaries if the Trades Unions and
the street agitators. Everywhere the same sinister picture presented
itself. I shall never forget the row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler,
Ellonbogen, and others. One fact became quite evident to me. It was that
this alien race held in its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic
Party with whose minor representatives I had been disputing for months
past."
Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.
> >
> >Without going (again, and again and again) through the whole
> >bloody catalogue of post-Disney "Disney's" - you will perhaps
> >recall that there has for some years been a boycott of Disney
> >films by 10 million American christians.
>
> I cannot 'recall' something I never knew about.
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of Their
Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment". It is
subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are from the Aug
1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power
and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential
pruduction executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a
heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a
gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic attitudes, now
features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
>
> What anti-Anglo-Saxon propaganda? We need no help to recognise that we
> have done things, that with hindsight, we cannot be proud of. At the
> time however, they were regarded as perfectly acceptable.
Whites created civilization on the earth and have everything to be proud
of. Jew propaganda movies are the opposite of the truth.
> You have a blind spot that prevents you recognising that people that
> oppose you have a legitimate pov, and especially that they might be
> right & you wrong.
>
Here is proof that the media is biased against Whites.
A month ago I told you about the murder of two White girls, Tracy
Lambert and Susan Moore, in Fayetteville, North Carolina, as part of
the initiation of new members into the Black and Hispanic Crips gang.
I'm still receiving comments about that program. Apparently many
listeners -- especially those with Internet access -- checked out the
facts as reported in the Fayetteville newspaper, and they were shocked
that, just as I said, there was no media coverage of these terrible
murders outside the Fayetteville area. They were shocked that
virtually all of the mainstream media around the country would
deliberately hide the news of these racially motivated murders from
the White public -- and these were the same media which had made such
a sensation about the killing of a convicted Black drug dealer and his
girlfriend in Fayetteville by a White soldier, James Burmeister, in
December 1995.
But really, no one who has been listening to my broadcasts should have
been shocked. I have commented over and over again about the virtual
control of all of America's mass media by the Jews, and I have pointed
out many times that the Jews' policy is to disarm the White population
morally as well as physically by deliberately creating the false
impression that Whites are oppressors and victimizers, and non-Whites
are our innocent victims. They want us to feel guilty. They want us to
feel that it would be immoral for us to resist any of their schemes
for more non-White immigration, for more so-called "diversity" and
That is what the Jewish media bosses are deliberately pushing: the
destruction of our people through racial mixing, and they don't want
us to put up any resistance. And I am sorry to say, their program is
succeeding. When they send their step'n'fetchit Bill Clinton around
the country making speeches about how much he is looking forward to an
America with a non-White majority, about how any resistance to the
government's programs for the darkening of America would be
un-American, he is applauded by brainwashed young Whites who have been
deceived by this deliberately falsified media impression of Whites as
oppressors.
Now you know, I am making a pretty serious accusation. I am accusing
the Jewish population as a whole -- and the Jewish media bosses in
particular -- of planning our annihilation as a race, of planning to
commit genocide against us. And I don't want anyone to think that I am
basing my accusation on only the few instances of racially motivated
killings I already have cited: their suppression of the news of the
Fayetteville murders of two White girls by the Crips and their
sensationalizing of the news of the Fayetteville shooting of a Black
drug dealer and his girlfriend by a White soldier and of the dragging
death of another convicted Black criminal in Teaxas by three Whites.
Jewish media have deliberately covered up. The details aren't pleasant
-- in fact, they are shocking -- but I believe that many listeners
need to be shocked.
Let's begin with another crime which occurred in Fayetteville. This is
timely because the trial of the criminals began just last week. Here's
what happened: Donald Lange, a 25-year-old White soldier at Fort Bragg
accidentally bumped into a group of seven Black soldiers who were
going in. The Blacks began punching Lange while shouting racial
insults at him. They dragged him into the adjacent parking lot and
stomped and kicked him while continuing to shout racial epithets.
A witness in the trial of the Blacks, Tracye Cochran, was in the
parking lot where the assault took place. She told the court last
week, -- quote -- "The Black person who threw the first punch was the
one who knocked him down. . . . It dropped him down to his knees. He
got back up and got hit again. . . . I was walking toward the fight
screaming and hollering for them to leave him alone. . . . By then he
was just getting hit by people left and right." Another witness, Gina
Perez, testified that she saw eight or ten Blacks kicking and stomping
Lange as he lay on the pavement. She told of seeing one Black kicking
Lange in the face, causing his head to slam into the pavement and
bounce back. The Black would then kick him again, over and over. Perez
said, "They just kicked him to death. I remember him being on his
side, being kicked over and over again."
an example of why we must do something about "race hate." But
Mr. Clinton has responded to the stomping of Donald Lange with
silence.
If Donald Lange had been Black and his attackers White, the media
bosses would have had Janet Reno on television announcing that she was
sending in the FBI. The media would have been interviewing every
professional hate merchant: the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, Morris Dees and his Southern
Poverty Law Center, and all the rest. The media would have made a real
circus of it, and the whole world would have had it drummed into their
consciousness: another hate crime against a poor, innocent Black by
White racists in Fayetteville.
In order to convince the media bosses that he was doing something to
"end hate" after the Burmeister shooting of the Black drug dealer, the
commanding general of Fort Bragg ordered a witch hunt among the White
soldiers on the base. Every White soldier was checked for tattoos that
might suggest a skinhead affiliation. As the media frenzy continued,
the witch hunt for White racists in the Army eventually spread to
other bases. Now, don't hold your breath waiting for the general at
beliefs and their gang affiliations because of what Blacks from the
there, and the general has better things to do with his time.
Last month a Black mob in Alton, Illinois, which is a suburb of St.
into their neighborhood looking for his stolen television set. As they
were beating and kicking 48-year-old Richard Skelton to death on
August 10, the Blacks hooted, laughed, and shouted racial insults,
according to a number of eye-witnesses.
Now, it's possible that you may have read a few words about this
racially motivated murder -- if you're a careful reader of the small
news items in the back pages of your newspaper. But you certainly
didn't see anything about it on television or read any detailed news
accounts, unless you live in the immediate vicinity of Alton. Even the
news accounts in Alton tried to excuse the Black murderers by
suggesting that Skelton may have precipitated the attack on himself by
using racially insensitive language in asking about his stolen
beating the unarmed White man. Black bystanders watched and shouted
encouragement to the attackers. Others joined in the attack, and soon
as many as 25 Blacks were beating and kicking Skelton. They continued
kicking him until he was dead.
Again, imagine the response of the controlled mass media if the races
of the victim and the killers had been reversed: a Black wanders into
a White neighborhood and is beaten to death by a mob of 25 Whites who
laugh and shout racial insults as the Black dies. My god, the media
would be apoplectic! They would be calling for martial law and a
roundup of all heterosexual White males who weren't registered
over and over and over again, along with sermons against White racism.
But as it is, most of my listeners are now hearing about last month's
racially motivated mob murder of Richard Skelton for the first time.
Here's another one that you may have read a few words about if you're
a news hound or if you live in eastern New York state. Earlier this
month in Poughkeepsie, New York, a town on the Hudson River about 70
miles north of New York City, police discovered the decomposing
corpses of seven White women and one Black woman in the house of
Kendall Francois. The women had been murdered over a two-year period,
with the latest being killed just a month ago. Francois is a
27-year-old Black man who works as a hall monitor in a nearby high
school. Affirmative action got him the school job even though he had a
previous arrest record. Francois was living with his mother and father
and younger sister -- and eight decaying corpses. Police found the
dead women lying on beds and in the midst of piles of rotting garbage
in various rooms of his house. Francois's parents and his sister, who
is employed as a nurse at a nearby hospital, said that they hadn't
was the odor of the garbage which had been allowed to accumulate in
the house. Francois had picked up the women, one at a time, taken them
to his house, had sex with them, and then strangled them.
Now, in a sense the murders of these women may not have been race
crimes. The women were all prostitutes, and aside from the fact that
Francois had a preference for killing White prostitutes, we don't
really know what his motive was for killing them...
The real racial angle to these killings is the media response -- or
lack thereof. Do you remember John Wayne Gacy or Jeffrey Dahmer? I'm
sure you do, even though Gacy was arrested 20 years ago and Dahmer
more than seven years ago. Both of them also were serial killers who
stashed the bodies of their victims in or under their houses. Both
received enormous publicity when police caught them -- so much that we
still remember them many years later. But they were both White...
Earlier this month a court in Colorado convicted Francisco Martinez of
participating in the abduction, gang rape, torture, and murder of a
14-year-old White girl, Brandy Duvall. Martinez and six other members
of the Black and Hispanic Bloods gang grabbed Brandy from a bus stop
girl to the house of one of the gang members and spent several hours
raping her and then sexually torturing her with a knife and a
broomstick. During the trial one of the gang members told the court
how Martinez laughed as he repeatedly rammed a broomstick into the
body of the bleeding girl while she screamed and pleaded for her life.
Later they stabbed the 14-year-old girl 28 times and dumped her body
in a ditch. Then they went home and disposed of the bloody mattress on
which she had been raped and tortured.
Four of the Bloods gang members have pleaded guilty, one other besides
Martinez has been tried and convicted, and one is still awaiting
trial. This case is reminiscent of the Fayetteville murders last month
of two White girls by members of the Crips. The Crips and the Bloods
are the two largest non-White gangs in the United States. Like the
Fayetteville murders, Brandy Duvall's murder and the subsequent trials
have received virtually no national news coverage, although
Denver-area newspapers did report them.
Once again, imagine the reaction of the television networks and all of
the other national media if instead of the Bloods raping, sexually
torturing, and murdering a 14-year-old White girl, seven Ku Klux Klan
members had done that to a Black girl or a Mexican girl. The gruesome
details would be on every television screen in America night after
night after night, and there would be no end to the parade of
politicians and preachers and professional hate merchants telling us
about the evils of White racism. We know that's what would happen,
recently in the dragging death of the Black convict in Jasper, Texas,
this summer.
Now, all of the Black-on-White crimes I've just mentioned -- the
became a mindless vegetable; the kicking of Richard Skelton to death
by a Black mob in Alton, Illinois, when he tried to retrieve his
stolen television set; the murder of seven White prostitutes by a
torture, and murder of 14-year-old Brandy Duvall by members of the
Bloods gang in the Denver area after they had snatched her from a bus
stop -- all of these either occurred during the past month or came to
trial during the past month. And I could have given you twenty more
recent examples of horrible race crimes committed by non-Whites
against Whites which have received the silent treatment by the media,
except in the areas where they occurred. And these are all crimes
which would have received extensive national publicity if they had
been White-on-Black crimes.
Anyway, I hope that I've made my point. And my point is that the
controlled media are far more likely to publicize White-on-Black
crimes than Black-on-White crimes. And this is not just a fluke. It's
not that I have carefully selected a few Black-on-White crimes which
somehow escaped the attention of the media. No, their way of dealing
with interracial crime is systematic. It is consistent. We all
understand that. If the Ku Klux Klan does something, the Jewish media
act as if the sky is falling. If the Bloods or the Crips do something,
they ignore it. There is no denying that. We know it's true.
So why do they do it? If I ask a non-Jewish newspaper writer or
television reporter or magazine editor: "Why do you and your
colleagues minimize the news of Black-on-White crime? Why are you
protective of non-White organizations such as the Bloods and the
Crips? Don't you believe that you have a responsibility to warn the
White public about the dangers posed for us by non-White crime in
general and by non-White gangs such as the Bloods and the Crips in
particular?
"And why do your colleagues maximize the news of any White-on-Black
crime? Why do you go ballistic if there's any possibility of a White
organizational connection, even if some racially oriented literature
is found in the White offender's possession? Don't you understand that
the Bloods and the Crips are essentially anti-White criminal
organizations, while the Klan can only be accused of having members
who sometimes do stupid things? Why do you deliberately create the
false impression in the public mind that White-on-Black crime --
that's what you call "hate crime" -- is a big problem in our society,
and at the same time you hide from the public the truly horrendous and
dangerous problem of Black-on-White crime? Why do you do it?"
I've never gotten really clear and honest answers to these questions.
But what is clear is that they all know how they're expected to report
the news. They know what the party line is. They know which side their
bread is buttered on. It's clear that the top media bosses have set
the fashion for reporting interracial crime, and no one who works for
them is willing to depart from the fashion.
That fashion, which is almost never stated explicitly, which is only
implied, is this: White people are evil -- especially heterosexual
White males. They have persecuted non-Whites for hundreds of years.
White people really shouldn't complain if non-Whites sometimes strike
back at them. That's only justice. When Blacks and Mexicans organize
in gangs, it's only to protect themselves from Whites. But when Whites
organize, it's to oppress non-Whites. Whites need to be reminded that
they are oppressors. That's why White crimes against non-Whites should
be emphasized. And if we're to have a happy and prosperous
multicultural society with lots of diversity, which is of course a
wonderful thing, then Whites need to mix more with non-Whites . . . so
we shouldn't give them any news which might make them reluctant to
mix. We shouldn't tell them about Black crimes against Whites, because
that might frighten White women away from Black men. It might even
lead Whites to organize against non-Whites. In the long run the only
sure way to have a peaceful society, in which everyone gets along with
everyone else, is to get rid of the White majority: to replace the
present White majority with a non-White majority. A lot of racial
mixing and racial intermarriage will help to achieve that, and we
should report the news with that aim in mind.
That is the prevailing fashion in the controlled mass media today,
whether the media people will admit it or not. That fashion has been
set deliberately by the media bosses. And I, curious and inquisitive
person that I am, have looked at where that fashion is taking us, and
when I have done that I have looked into the face of death: racial
death, racial extinction. And I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have
decided that the Jewish media bosses who designed the current fashion
in reporting the news have in fact designed it with that aim in mind.
And I also have decided that it is our responsibility to ourselves, to
our posterity, to our ancestors, and to the God of Nature which made
us what we are to use any and all means -- any and all means -- to
combat these Jewish media bosses and their collaborators in the
government, in the schools, in the churches, and wherever else we find
them.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
or e-mail: nati...@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Kenneth McVay, OBC" <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:8vubdl$17bn$1...@news.tht.net...
> In article <yB3asUAb...@activist.demon.co.uk>,
>
> The anti-Anglo-Saxon propaganda works like this:
>
> The anti-Anglo-Saxon racist makes claims which demonstrate that
> Anglo-Saxons are very stupid.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second world
are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict. It is
because the White race is on average much more intelligent than the Black
race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the people in
India.
>
> For instance, our racist will claim that Wascally Jews control the
> media, which clearly implies that Anglo-Saxons are too stupid to think
> for themselves.
That is not implied.
>
> Or he might claim that Wascally Jews control the government, which
> clearly implies that Anglo-Saxons are also too stupid to govern
> themselves.
That is clearly not implied.
>
> ...or he might make the claim that Wascally Jews control the monetary
> supply, which obviously is another way of telling us that Anglo-Saxons
> are too stupid to control their own monetary affairs.
It doesn't say anything like that, but the Jews do control the money.
Here is a quote from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published in
1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite evident
reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage in the
persuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed a
great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of opportunity left
open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning they developed a certain
cruelty and greed. That was natural. The world was cruel to them, so when
the chance was theirs, they were cruel in return..."
>
> It is difficult to assess the motivation behind such ugly
> anti-Anglo-Saxon propaganda without being a bit of a mystic. On the
> one hand, the AAS<tm> agitators _here_ seem to devote inordinate
> amounts of time and energy praising Jews... after all, making all of
> the claims above (and the typical AAS does, day in and day out) would
> tend to suggest that these folks adore the Jews, and view them as the
> only folks on the planet capable of walking and chewing gum at the
> same time. And yet the AAS also claims to "hate" the Jews, or, in many
> cases, the elusive "Zionist," as in "I don't hate Jews, just
> Zionists." When queried, of course, they readily admit that they
> believe 99% of all Jews are Zionists, so using the Zionist dodge
> simply becomes one _more_ way of telling Anglo-Saxons how stupid they
> are.
>
> I don't see these AAS racists as much of a problem, however, as it
> seems to me that Anglo-Saxons can take care of themselves when it
> comes to sweeping up the gutter trash from time to time.
>
Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist Party
Congress:
"Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism in
Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham, Dr.
Levy-Lenz and others. At regular meetings, held in the presence of a notary
public, members were requested to register their declaration of withdrawal
from their church for a fee of 2 Marks. And this the fight for atheism was
carried on. Between 1918 and 1933 the withdrawals from the German
Evangelical Churches alone amounted to two-and-a-half million persons in
Germany. The programme which these atheistic societies laid down in regard
to sexual matters is amply charcterized in the following demands publicly
expressed at meetings and distributed in leaflet form:
1) The complete abrogation of the paragraphs of the law dealing with the
crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of charge in
State Hospitals.
2) Non-interference with prostitution.
3) The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard to
marriage and divorce.
4) Official registration to be optional and the children to be educated by
the community.
5) Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to be
granted to all persons condemned as 'sexual criminals'.
"Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the wilful
destruction of the nations and their civilization and the substitute of
barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
"Where are the men behind the scenes of this virulent world movement?
Who are the inventors of all this madness? Who transplanted this ensemble
into Russia and is today making the attempt to have it prevail in other
countries? The answer to these question discloses the actual secret of our
anti-Jewish policy and our uncomromising fight against Jewry; for the
Bolshevic International is in reality nothing less than a Jewish
International."
Alex Vange
"David Gehrig" <zem...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3A227DC4...@earthlink.net...
> Ah, so that's why the 101 Dalmations are black and white --
> the Jews are subliminally promoting race mixing.
>
What about Pocahantus?
Ian F.
>Absolutely, thoughI feel I want to tell these people how mis-informed
>they are I will not post any further replies. Hey, I'll kill the thread.
>There's no convincing these people that they are mad. And I cetainly
>won't try doing so in umtm.
I take your point, Richard, but as someone else has so rightly pointed out
here, these people are definitely a matzo ball short of a bowl of chicken
soup. They are too pig-ignorant to respond to rational argument and are
probably best ignored - although I know just how hard it is to do that.
And here I am, perpetuating the thread...oy vey!
Kevin J. LaBerge
white you racist bastard.
-Kevin
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote in message
news:DdCU5.17$RO3.3...@news1.i1.net...
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Kevin J. LaBerge" <seatt...@bigsoccer.com> wrote in message
news:8vus82$5t7su$1...@ID-8013.news.dfncis.de...
> What a freaking moron. George Washington Carver for starters... BTW, I'm
> white you racist bastard.
>
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Ian F." <i...@jenniferanistonc2u.co.uk> wrote in message
news:euCU5.28773$8F2.3...@nnrp4.clara.net...
> >
> I take your point, Richard, but as someone else has so rightly pointed out
> here, these people are definitely a matzo ball short of a bowl of chicken
> soup. They are too pig-ignorant to respond to rational argument and are
> probably best ignored - although I know just how hard it is to do that.
>
> And here I am, perpetuating the thread...oy vey!
>
I didn't notice any rational arguement in your post, and you have your
beliefs because your only source of information is the Jewish controlled
media.
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of Their
Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment". It is
subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are from the Aug
1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power
and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential
pruduction executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a
heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a
gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic attitudes, now
features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner. On
studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to undermine the
unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and all Jewish -
management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and Tom Pollack."
Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media and Rule
America"
"American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Coumbia Broadcasting System
(CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these three has been
under the absolute control of a single man over a long enough period of
time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff the corporation at every
level with officers of his choosing and then to place his imprint indelibly
upon it. In each case that man has been a Jew.
"Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities Communications,
Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer
(CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a Jew...In an interview in
the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek, Goldenson boasted 'I built this company
(ABC) from scratch.'"
"CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than half
a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
"There has been no move by top G-E management to change the Jewish
"profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personel. To the contrary, new
Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve Friedman..."
"The man in charge of the television entertainment division at CBS is
Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two men....nearly
all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of reality, of good and
evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior are Jews. In particular,
Sagansky and Bloomberg arre Jews. So is Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only
Gentile who has had a significant role in TV entertainment programming in
recent years."
"American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment companies
and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross, Jew) Walt Disney
Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top entertainment CEOs listed
above, eight are Jews."
"The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a lack of
real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also illustrates the
insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of opinion... The
Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several large and important
ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the
New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's largest trade book publishing
conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsideries; Newhouse
Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87
cable-TV systems, including some of the countries largest cable networks-
the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million
copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker,
Vogue, Madamoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's
Quarterly, Self, Home&Garden...."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidlines for nearly
all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't, at
national and international levels. They originate the news; the others
merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands...The Suzberger
family also owns, through the New York Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve
magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the Daily
News. The New York Post is owned by billionare Jewish real-estate developer
Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern,
the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
"There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the United
States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO of Time
Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
"Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post
Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
"U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real estate
developer Mortimer B. Zucherman..."
" The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon & Schuster
, and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled by Jews...The
CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the president is Jeremy
Kaplan; both are Jews too."
"Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of childrens books, with
more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard
Bernstein, a Jew."
"Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
"We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our
political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving
them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
Kenneth McVay, OBC
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
> No, it only says that Jews control the media. Most people might think
Poor Mr. Vangel. His comment only proves one thing - that _some_
White folks really _are_ as stupid as he claims all non-Jews to
be... and Mr. Vangel is one of them!
If the Jews "control" the media, it can only be because non-Jews are
too stupid to either acquire and invest the capital required to
purchase media firms, or because non-Jews are too stupid to realize
they should control the media, or simply because non-Jews are too
stupid to think for themselves... no matter how you slice it, Mr.
Vangel's contention is a slap in the face of all non-Jews. That Mr.
Vangel fails to see this simply underscores his personal inabiloity
to think rationally.
>about your conclusion but then dismiss it as nonsense. After all, if there
>was any logic to it you would explain it wouldn't you?
Mr. Vangel has demonstrated, again and again, that he is quite
incapable of thinking logically, and that is why he fails to
comprehend his continuing program of slander against non-Jews... not
to mention his constant praise of the Jews themselves, whom, he
insists, control not only the media, but:
The government
The monetary system
Academia
AND The Courts....
As if these praises were not sufficient to help us all understand
his awe of the Jews, he goes on to insist that these selfsame Jews,
created and maintained a First World nation - the United States.
After all, one cannot create such a nation without control of the
government, Courts, money, academia and media, now can one?
Why Mr. Vangel continues this pro-Jewish, anti-Anglo-Saxon charade
is beyond me.
Kenneth McVay, OBC
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
> Jews may be technically White but they are not considered one of us
>because they are known enemies of White civilization.
...and yet Mr. Vangel insists that Canada and the United States are
"first world" nations.... created and controlled by Wascally Juice!
In short, White folks have benefitted from this "control" he
continues to insist the Juice have over us!
Poor Mr. Vangel... logic is not his long suit.
Kenneth McVay, OBC
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
> We are for preserving the White race. The Jews are opposed to this,
>except of course for themselves. They can have their Jew country and
>Americans can give them billions of dollars to have it. But any suggestion
>that it might be OK to have a nation for White people is what they are
>fighting against.
Then why does Mr. VAngel continue to vilify White folks in these
very newsgroups?
Why has Mr. Vangel openly advocated the murder of White children?
Is that how he thinks we are to be "preserved?"
Kenneth McVay, OBC
<va...@i1.net> wrote:
> For one thing the Jews were behind Communism:
Mr. Vangel, why do you continue to make this claim without
addressing the questions presented?
How many Bolsheviks were there - i.e. what was the precise
membership of the group that led to the establishment communism?
How many of them were Christian, Mr. Vangel?
How many of them were Moslem, Mr. Vangel?
How many of them were3 Jewish, Mr. Vangel?
How many were Germans, Mr. Vangel?
How many were White folks, Mr. Vangel?
Kenneth McVay, OBC
<va...@i1.net> insulted Ian F. when he wrote:
> I didn't notice any rational arguement in your post, and you have your
>beliefs because your only source of information is the Jewish controlled
>media.
In other words, Ian F., Mr. Vangel says that you are really, really,
stupid... far too stupid, for instance, to think for yourself.
Don't feel badly, however... Mr. Vangel thinks the same of all
non-Jews.
Paul Hyett
view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>
>intelligent than Blacks.
Even if this were true (and not dependent on environmental & educational
factors), how does this lead to the notion that they should be treated
as 2nd class citizens?
>White people invented just about everything
>important.
Might that just be mainly to do with opportunity, not ability?
Rich Egan
> > > Paul Hyett wrote:
> > >
> > > > Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
> > > > subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
> > >
> > > they have renamed the characters "Mischa Mouse" and "Dovidl Duck."
> > > "Goofy" they just removed two letters of: "Goy."
> >
> > Thats funny, but it's not how they work. They would
> > never change the names of two recognisable money
> > makers.They would subtly change the messages of
> > these characters to say what they want the little
> > Goyim to believe .
>
> Ah, so that's why the 101 Dalmations are black and white --
> the Jews are subliminally promoting race mixing.
That movie has no bearing on this discussion.
It was made Walt Disney was still alive.
Regards
Rich
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Rich Egan
Kevin J. LaBerge <seatt...@bigsoccer.com> wrote in message
news:8vus82$5t7su$1...@ID-8013.news.dfncis.de...
> white you racist bastard.
Thank you for showing the true height of your intellect.
Yes it's George Washinton Carver for starters. but it
also ends there as well.
All this stacks up against men like Michelangelo,
Galilieo, Ben Franklin, Levasseur, Gustave Otto,
Fulton and Fitch, Newcomen. The Wright Bros.
Henry Ford, Fleming, Edison , Westinghouse,
Tesla, Philo Farnsworth, Holland, Allan Turing .
Shall I go on? I hope I've made my point .
" If truth were self evident, we wouldn't need
elequence"
Regards
Rich
Sic Semper Tyrannis
>
KDBANGLIA
<pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
>>White people invented just about everything
>>important.
>
I'd say that blood transfusion was quite important!
Richard.
MikeW
Rich Egan wrote:
> Kevin J. LaBerge <seatt...@bigsoccer.com> wrote in message
> news:8vus82$5t7su$1...@ID-8013.news.dfncis.de...
> > What a freaking moron. George Washington Carver for starters... BTW, I'm
> > white you racist bastard.
>
> Thank you for showing the true height of your intellect.
> Yes it's George Washinton Carver for starters. but it
> also ends there as well.
> All this stacks up against men like Michelangelo,
> Galilieo, Ben Franklin, Levasseur, Gustave Otto,
> Fulton and Fitch, Newcomen. The Wright Bros.
> Henry Ford, Fleming, Edison , Westinghouse,
> Tesla, Philo Farnsworth, Holland, Allan Turing .
> Shall I go on?
Some Black inventors for you...
James S. Adams Aeroplane propelling
A.P. Ashbourne Biscuit cutter
L.C. Bailey Folding bed
James A. Bauer Coin changer
Andrew Beard Rotary engine
Andrew Beard Car coupler
G.E. Becket Letter box
Alfred Benjamin Stainless steel pads
Henry Blair Corn planter
Sarah Boone Ironing board
Otis Boykin Pace maker controls
Guided-missile
H. Bradberry Torpedo discharge
Charles Brooks Street sweeper
Phil Brooks Disposable syringe
L.F. Brown Horse bridle bit
Marie Brown Home security system
Oscar E. Brown Horseshoe
John A. Burr Lawn mower
Burridge & Marshman Typewriter
R.A. Butler Train alarm
Geo.Carruthers Image converter
Radiation detector
Larry Christie Pillow utilizing air/water
John Clark Track athlete trainer
George Cook Automatic fishing reel
A.L. Cralle Ice cream mold
Wm. D. Davis Horse riding saddle
W.A. Deitz Shoe
Joseph Dickinson Player piano
Arm for record player
o. Dorsey Door stop
Door knob
Clatonia J. Dorticus Photo print wash
Photo embossing mach.
P.B. Dowing Postal letter box
Dr. Charles Drew Blood plasma
T. Elkins Toilet (commode)
David A.Fusher Furniture caster
Robert Flemming Jr. Guitar
David Gittens Ikenga - gyroplane
Ikenga/mk3 -automobile
Skooterboard
Geo. F. Grant Golf tee
J. Gregory Motor
Micheal Harney Lantern
Solomon Harper Thermo hair curlers
Wm. Harwell Attachment for shuttle arm.
Device used to capture satellites
Augustus Jackson Ice cream
B.F. Jackson Gas burner
H.A. Jackson Kitchen table
Joseph N. Jackson Programmable remote control
Video commander
Artis Jenkins O.F. Cable w/non-met. sheath
Issac R. Johnson Bicycle frame
Jerry Johnson Sani-phone
John A. Johnson Wrench
Lonnie Johnson Super soaker
P. Johnson Eye protection
W. Johnson Egg beater
Jones & Long Bottle caps
H. Jordan Clothes dresser
Latimer& Nichols Electric lamp
W.A. Lavalette Printing press
Lester Lee Lasher fuels
Maurice W. Lee Pressure cooker
F.W. Leslie Envelope seal
A.L. Lewis Window cleaner
John L. Love Pencil sharpener
Tom J. Marshal Fire extinguisher
W.W. Martin Lock
Jan Matzeliger Shoe lasting machine
Elijah McCoy Lubricators
Hugh McDonald Rocket catapult
Alexander Miles Elevator
Garrett Morgan Gas mask
Traffic signal
Lyda Newman Hair brush
Alice H. Parker Heating furnace
J.F. Pickering Air ship (Blimp)
Purdy & Sadgwar Folding chair
W.B. Purvis Hand stamp
Fountain pen
L.P. Ray Dust pan
A.C. Richardson Insect destroyer gun
W.H. Richardson Baby buggy
N. Rillieux Sugar refinement
Walter Sammons Pressing comb
Hair dressing device
G.T. Sampson Clothes drier
Henry Sampson Cellular phone
E.W Stewart Mop
Dewey Sanderson Urinalysis machine
Ralph Sanderson Hydraulic shock absorber
S.R. Scottron Curtain rod
Adolph Shamms Multi-stage rocket
J.W. Smith Lawn sprinkler
R.B. Spikes Automatic gear shift
J. Standard Refrigerator
Darryl Thomas Cattle roping apparatus
Rufus J. Weaver Stairclimbing wheelchair
Morris B. William's Polym. water Reduct.paint
Paul E Williams Helicopter
J.B. Winters Fire escape ladder
shall I go on?.
Mike Warren.
chris chow
<kdba...@aol.com> wrote:
the wheel, writing and zero cannot be very important however
--
chris chow lok hin
Rich Egan
vileness Fats <rot...@jocon.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8vujcv$pvr$1...@newsreaderm1.core.theplanet.net...
> bob, crediting the americans with capturing the enigma machine (in a
film),
> is not a jewish thing, its an american thing.
When I first saw Bob's post on this, I was
tempted to ignore it, as I thought that it was
a well known enough incident that it needed
no further explanation . I see I was wrong .
It's beginning to get a life of it's own , So
here goes.
It happened late in the war, 44, I believe
I don't have the story in front of me soI'm
working off the top of my head . An
American Captain or Admiral captured
an German submarine in the Atantic. The
crew tried to scuttle it , But the Americans
got a boarding party on it ( The first time
a boarding party was used since 1812)
and secured it . I beleive it was the U555.
The Sub had an enigma machine on
board along with all that info and the
daily code changes. This being the
case , The crews of both ships were
isolated , to prevent the knowledge
of the capture getting back to the
Germans. The sub was saved and it
now rests in the Museum of science
and Industry in Chicago, Illinois.
There was a reunion of both crews
a few years ago which was filmed.
This was not how the US got the
enigma machine. We had been breaking
the Japanese JN25 code since July
1941. What we did get were the daily
code changes , which the Germans
could have changed very easily had
they known that we had them. This
was a relativly minor incident in the war
while it helped somewhat by having
the codes , Germany would have
lost anyway.
David Freeman
MikeW <Mi...@here.and.now> wrote in message
news:3A23C6D0...@here.and.now...
>
>
> Rich Egan wrote:
>
> > Kevin J. LaBerge <seatt...@bigsoccer.com> wrote in message
> > news:8vus82$5t7su$1...@ID-8013.news.dfncis.de...
I'm
> > > white you racist bastard.
> >
> > Yes it's George Washinton Carver for starters. but it
> > also ends there as well.
> > All this stacks up against men like Michelangelo,
> > Galilieo, Ben Franklin, Levasseur, Gustave Otto,
> > Fulton and Fitch, Newcomen. The Wright Bros.
> > Henry Ford, Fleming, Edison , Westinghouse,
> > Tesla, Philo Farnsworth, Holland, Allan Turing .
> > Shall I go on?
>
> Some Black inventors for you...
>
>
Out of interest Mike, where did you get that from? Don't tell me it was
from memory.
Dave
z
superior white race! You see their dastardly plan now, I hope.
In article <20001128095502...@nso-ff.aol.com>,
kdba...@aol.com (KDBANGLIA) wrote:
> I'd say that blood transfusion was quite important!
>
> Richard.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
David Lentz
Alex Vange wrote:
<snip>
>
> All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
> intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
> important.
Not all intelligence tests. Blacks do better at one test, I
believe it make a face of something.
However intelligence tests to not measure total human
intelligence. For the simple reason that total human
intelligence has yet to be defined, It stands to reason, you can
not measure what you have not defined. Rather intelligence tests
measure a set of aptitudes. Different intelligence tests measure
different sets of aptitudes.
Intelligence tests have a value in being a predictor of future
performance. That is about it.
David
--
qyra...@ebpurfgre.ee.pbz
David Lentz
"Kevin J. LaBerge" wrote:
>
> What a freaking moron. George Washington Carver for starters... BTW, I'm
> white you racist bastard.
We have George Washington Carver, and others. Not a long list.
However consider this point, take the list blacks making notable
achievements and think you will see it consists almost entirely
of non AFrican blacks. That blacks who no longer lived in
Africa. Is there a note worthy achievement by black residing in
AFrica. Maybe.
However, I suggest that the fact the what achievements that have
been made by blacks seem to be made by ethnic blacks not residing
in Africa suggests a cultural cause for this disparity.
Further, I will suggest what a major problem is in Africa,
tribalism. In emigrating out of Africa, by either voluntary or
involuntary means, tribal identification was destroyed. Whereas
in in Africa today, tribalism is the major group identification
and the source of African political and cultural woes.
I offer no solution.
David
--
qyra...@ebpurfgre.ee.pbz
CG Luxford
> > film), is not a jewish thing, its an american thing.
>
> When I first saw Bob's post on this, I was
> tempted to ignore it, as I thought that it was
> a well known enough incident that it needed
> no further explanation . I see I was wrong .
> It's beginning to get a life of it's own , So
> here goes.
> It happened late in the war, 44,
ie. 4 years after a British crew captured an enigma machine and code
books from a U Boat.
Chris,
Rich Egan
MikeW <Mi...@here.and.now> wrote in message
news:3A23C6D0...@here.and.now...
>
>
> Rich Egan wrote:
>
> > Kevin J. LaBerge <seatt...@bigsoccer.com> wrote in message
> > news:8vus82$5t7su$1...@ID-8013.news.dfncis.de...
I'm
> > > white you racist bastard.
> >
> > Yes it's George Washinton Carver for starters. but it
> > also ends there as well.
> > All this stacks up against men like Michelangelo,
> > Galilieo, Ben Franklin, Levasseur, Gustave Otto,
> > Fulton and Fitch, Newcomen. The Wright Bros.
> > Henry Ford, Fleming, Edison , Westinghouse,
> > Tesla, Philo Farnsworth, Holland, Allan Turing .
> > Shall I go on?
>
> Some Black inventors for you...
>
>
the Propellers used in the water by David
Bushnell who built the "turtle" during the
American Revolution. and later on the
two Confederate submarines, the David
and The Hundley. The Wright Bros were the
first to use them in an aerial configuration
> A.P. Ashbourne Biscuit cutter
There's agreat temptation to be sarcastic
about something so simple but I won't
> L.C. Bailey Folding bed And here all
along I thought it was a chap named Murphy!
> James A. Bauer Coin changer
Bauer is not a Black name , It's German.
Means a farmer
> Andrew Beard Rotary engine
What Rotary engine" Strictly speaking
all engines are rotary You don't mean
The "Wankel Rotary " thayt was used
inMazda autos. Or do you mean the
Gnome Rotary or the Or the German
Rotaries on the WW1 models .
> Andrew Beard Car coupler
> G.E. Becket Letter box.
Somebody actually "Invented"
a letter Box?
> Alfred Benjamin Stainless steel pads
Stainless steel pads for what ?
> Henry Blair Corn planter
My info says it was It was
the Deere/ Mansur co.
> Sarah Boone Ironing board
This is like "Letter Box" It's a board
So where's the invention ?
> Otis Boykin Pace maker controls
> Guided-missile
Charles lindbergh was working on this
in the forties and fifties. The Germans
had worked the basics of this with
the V2 rockets of the forties.
> H. Bradberry Torpedo discharge
And here I was thinking all along that it
the Irishman , John Holland , who invented
the first working Submarine.
> Charles Brooks Street sweeper
That was his invention or his occupation ?
> Phil Brooks Disposable syringe
Don't know ! ? You may be right.
> L.F. Brown Horse bridle bit
Horese and bridles have been around for
too long for anyone to claim that they
invented it.
> Marie Brown Home security system.
how isa "Home Security system any different
than any other system.
> Oscar E. Brown Horseshoe
The Romans were shoeing horses.
was he a Roman ?
> John A. Burr Lawn mower
Which one Manual or Power
> Burridge & Marshman Typewriter
My book says it was a white man named
Christopher Sholes, Carlos Glidden,and
S.W. Soule . No Burridge and Marshman
> R.A. Butler Train alarm
Alarm for what ? Burglars? imminent
derailings ? avalanches ? What did this
warn of ?
> Geo.Carruthers Image converter
> Radiation detector
Image of what ? It was P.T. Farnsworth
who concieved the Cathode Ray tube.
in 1912. This was decided in a case
brought by RCA in which Farnsworth
prevailed.
> Larry Christie Pillow utilizing air/water
HUH?
> John Clark Track athlete trainer
What did he invent?
> George Cook Automatic fishing reel
Unbelieable !
>
> A.L. Cralle Ice cream mold
Molding foods is avery old thing .
> Wm. D. Davis Horse riding saddle
The Romans had saddles, Was he Roman?
> W.A. Deitz Shoe
Dietz! A black Roman ? Invented the shoe?
We know that the use of shoes predates
the romans. Otzi , the Ice man of Italy had
a type of shoe 5000, years ago. No
watermellon for that .
> Joseph Dickinson Player piano
I doubt this. The player piano was
invented by someone who worked
around Jaquard Looms in France
Arm for record player
Edison's first cylinder machines had
arms. This wasn't "Invented"
> o. Dorsey Door stop
> Door knob
I've see these in house that predated
the revolutionary war.
> Clatonia J. Dorticus Photo print wash
> Photo embossing mach.
The mysteries of photography were pretty
well worked out in France by Daguerre
in the late 1840s.
>
> P.B. Dowing Postal letter box
Mail boxes again ?
> Dr. Charles Drew Blood plasma
I believe you are correct here
> T. Elkins Toilet (commode)
Actually the flush toilet was built
by Dr Richard Gatling , of Gatling
Gun fame. Simple Commodes can
be seen in 13th century castles.
> David A.Fusher Furniture caster
Wheels on furniture ? OK
> Robert Flemming Jr. Guitar
Guitars were brought to the new world
by the Spanish in the 1600s.
> David Gittens Ikenga - gyroplane
> Ikenga/mk3 -automobile
Huh? Autos with gyros ?
> Skooterboard
Ok
> Geo. F. Grant Golf tee
And just what were those scotsmen over at
Saint Andrews, doing beforte this?
> J. Gregory Motor
Motor ? What Motor ? It was not the
Otto Engine. that was in Germany. It
was not the AC induction motor that was
invented by Nikola Tesla . So What
motor was it?
>
> Micheal Harney Lantern
The Romans had ;lanterns. Was he a
Romanalso?
> Solomon Harper Thermo hair curlers
Thermo haircurlers? Actually it was
thermo hair straightners .
> Wm. Harwell Attachment for shuttle arm.
> Device used to capture satellites
A titanium tennis racket ?
>
> Augustus Jackson Ice cream
Ice Cream has been around a long time.
Can we see some documentation?
> B.F. Jackson Gas burner
And here , all along i thought it was Bunsen.
> H.A. Jackson Kitchen table
There are 3000 year old Celtic homes that
had kitchen tables , Was Jackson a Celt?
> Joseph N. Jackson Programmable remote control
> Video commander
You may be right , I don't know.
> Artis Jenkins O.F. Cable w/non-met. sheath
O.F. Cable . What's that ?
> Issac R. Johnson Bicycle frame
The name is Iver Johnson and he wasn't Black
He was also a Gun manufacturer.
> Jerry Johnson Sani-phone
Sani phone ?
> John A. Johnson Wrench
Wrench? what wrench? Wrenches
go a long way back !
> Lonnie Johnson Super soaker
The super soaker , this is a toy, a bigger
water pistol . If it were mine , I wouldn't take
credit for "Inventing" it
> P. Johnson Eye protection
We know that Glasses predated the
Revolution.
> W. Johnson Egg beater
Ok you've got it!
> Jones & Long Bottle caps
Ok it's yours
> H. Jordan Clothes dresser
You mean a dreseer of Drawers
They go much further back than
any Black inventor. Again they
were known in Roman times.
> Latimer& Nichols Electric lamp
what was Edison doing?
> W.A. Lavalette Printing press
You mean it wasn't Guttenburg?
> Lester Lee Lasher fuels
Lasher fuels? Whats a Lasher?
If you mean Laser , They don't use fuel .
> Maurice W. Lee Pressure cooker
?
> F.W. Leslie Envelope seal
?
> A.L. Lewis Window cleaner
Is that his job or his invention
> John L. Love Pencil sharpener
Can't say !
> Tom J. Marshal Fire extinguisher
I doubt this !
> W.W. Martin Lock
No way. I have seen locksthat were as
old as the earliest settlers in America .
> Jan Matzeliger Shoe lasting machine
Ae you sure he was Black?
> Elijah McCoy Lubricators
So I'm told .
> Hugh McDonald Rocket catapult
Catapults are not new
> Alexander Miles Elevator
Wrong , It was Otis .
> Garrett Morgan Gas mask
> Traffic signal
So I'm told
> Lyda Newman Hair brush
you really mean Hair Pick don't you ?
> Alice H. Parker Heating furnace
furnace for what ? The best Idea about
furnaces was Henry Bessemer's . And
Ben Franklin invented the Franklin stove
> J.F. Pickering Air ship (Blimp)
No. small ones were built by the Brazillian
Alberto Santos-Dumont in the late 100s
It was Count Ferdinand Zeppelin who
perfected them .
> Purdy & Sadgwar Folding chair
Who knows ?
> W.B. Purvis Hand stamp
OK
> Fountain pen
I've gotta see some proof .
> L.P. Ray Dust pan
OK
> A.C. Richardson Insect destroyer gun
You mean Flit Gun?
> W.H. Richardson Baby buggy
Here again these go way back
> N. Rillieux Sugar refinement
You mean like Rum?
> Walter Sammons Pressing comb
> Hair dressing device
I can't say
> G.T. Sampson Clothes drier
gotta see some proof on this
> Henry Sampson Cellular phone
ditto
> E.W Stewart Mop
Mops were used to clear blood off the
decks of British Warships long before
the Revolution.
> Dewey Sanderson Urinalysis machine
Don't know , I'd like some proof , not
only that he is the inventor , but that he's
black
> Ralph Sanderson Hydraulic shock absorber
i can't say
> S.R. Scottron Curtain rod
Well thats something.
> Adolph Shamms
I believe that the great rocket scientist
was Robert Goddard m A white man
who was inventing them before ww2
> J.W. Smith Lawn sprinkler
Which one? There are so many types
> R.B. Spikes Automatic gear shift
This was invented by the engineers
at Gen Motors in 1935-36 . It was
a hydraulically operated Planetary gear
tranmission , borrowed from Henry
Ford who used it in the Model T ,
only his was manually operated .
I'm sure that there were NO black
engineers at GM in those days . You
are wrong on this one.
> J. Standard Refrigerator
Here again , The first refrigerators , as
opposed to the old Ice Box, was a GM
concept . Frigidaire was producing them
in the late twenties .
> Darryl Thomas Cattle roping apparatus
The Lariat was brought to the new world by
the Spanish.
> Rufus J. Weaver Stairclimbing wheelchair
OK
> Morris B. William's Polym. water Reduct.paint
I don't know
> Paul E Williams Helicopter
Wrong . The earliest concept of the
Heliocopter was found in Da Vinci's
drawings. Then there wasthe work of
Igor Sikorsky, Pitcairn , and De Cierva.
It was Sikorsky who was probably first.
The Germans were working on their
own designs in the forties under the
guidance of Von Doblhoff. No one
named Williams invented the Heliocopter.
> J.B. Winters Fire escape ladder
How do you invent a sliding ladder ?
>
> shall I go on?.
Please do !
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Kenneth McVay, OBC" <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:8vuub1$1n7u$1...@news.tht.net...
> In article <b_BU5.14$RO3.3...@news1.i1.net>, Alex Vangel
>
> Then why does Mr. VAngel continue to vilify White folks in these
> very newsgroups?
>
> Why has Mr. Vangel openly advocated the murder of White children?
>
> Is that how he thinks we are to be "preserved?"
>
I said that I agreed with the Bible because it is against the
homosexual perverts, the feminists, and the Jews.
This is what it says about delinquents:
Deuteronomy 21:18-21
"If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the
voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have
chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his
mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of the city, and
unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his city,
This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he
is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him
with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and
all Israel shall hear, and fear."
Alex Vange
"MikeW" <Mi...@here.and.now> wrote in message
news:3A23C6D0...@here.and.now...
>
>
> Some Black inventors for you...
>
First of all, how dark were they? Almost all "Black inventors" are at
least 90% White and look like Whites with a suntan.
>
> James S. Adams Aeroplane propelling
The Wright Brothers invented the airplane. What exactly did Adams do, and
how does he compare to the Wright Brothers?
> A.P. Ashbourne Biscuit cutter
Biscuit cutter?... Biscuit cutter? I was talking about electricity,
cars, air conditioning, computers etc etc. I don't think I need to say any
more about this post.
> L.C. Bailey Folding bed
> James A. Bauer Coin changer
> Andrew Beard Rotary engine
> Andrew Beard Car coupler
> G.E. Becket Letter box
> Alfred Benjamin Stainless steel pads
> Henry Blair Corn planter
> Sarah Boone Ironing board
> Otis Boykin Pace maker controls
> Guided-missile
> H. Bradberry Torpedo discharge
> Charles Brooks Street sweeper
> Phil Brooks Disposable syringe
> L.F. Brown Horse bridle bit
> Marie Brown Home security system
> Oscar E. Brown Horseshoe
> John A. Burr Lawn mower
> Burridge & Marshman Typewriter
> R.A. Butler Train alarm
> Geo.Carruthers Image converter
> Radiation detector
> Larry Christie Pillow utilizing air/water
> John Clark Track athlete trainer
> George Cook Automatic fishing reel
>
> A.L. Cralle Ice cream mold
> Wm. D. Davis Horse riding saddle
> W.A. Deitz Shoe
>
> Joseph Dickinson Player piano
> Arm for record player
> o. Dorsey Door stop
> Door knob
> Clatonia J. Dorticus Photo print wash
> Photo embossing mach.
>
> P.B. Dowing Postal letter box
> Dr. Charles Drew Blood plasma
> T. Elkins Toilet (commode)
> David A.Fusher Furniture caster
>
> Robert Flemming Jr. Guitar
> David Gittens Ikenga - gyroplane
> Ikenga/mk3 -automobile
> Skooterboard
> Geo. F. Grant Golf tee
> J. Gregory Motor
>
> Micheal Harney Lantern
> Solomon Harper Thermo hair curlers
> Wm. Harwell Attachment for shuttle arm.
> Device used to capture satellites
>
> Augustus Jackson Ice cream
> B.F. Jackson Gas burner
> H.A. Jackson Kitchen table
> Joseph N. Jackson Programmable remote control
> Video commander
> Artis Jenkins O.F. Cable w/non-met. sheath
> Issac R. Johnson Bicycle frame
> Jerry Johnson Sani-phone
> John A. Johnson Wrench
> Lonnie Johnson Super soaker
> P. Johnson Eye protection
> W. Johnson Egg beater
> Jones & Long Bottle caps
> H. Jordan Clothes dresser
> Latimer& Nichols Electric lamp
> W.A. Lavalette Printing press
> Lester Lee Lasher fuels
> Maurice W. Lee Pressure cooker
> F.W. Leslie Envelope seal
> A.L. Lewis Window cleaner
> John L. Love Pencil sharpener
> Tom J. Marshal Fire extinguisher
> W.W. Martin Lock
> Jan Matzeliger Shoe lasting machine
> Elijah McCoy Lubricators
> Hugh McDonald Rocket catapult
> Alexander Miles Elevator
> Garrett Morgan Gas mask
> Traffic signal
> Lyda Newman Hair brush
> Alice H. Parker Heating furnace
> J.F. Pickering Air ship (Blimp)
> Purdy & Sadgwar Folding chair
> W.B. Purvis Hand stamp
> Fountain pen
> L.P. Ray Dust pan
> A.C. Richardson Insect destroyer gun
> W.H. Richardson Baby buggy
> N. Rillieux Sugar refinement
> Walter Sammons Pressing comb
> Hair dressing device
> G.T. Sampson Clothes drier
> Henry Sampson Cellular phone
> E.W Stewart Mop
> Dewey Sanderson Urinalysis machine
> Ralph Sanderson Hydraulic shock absorber
> S.R. Scottron Curtain rod
> Adolph Shamms Multi-stage rocket
> J.W. Smith Lawn sprinkler
> R.B. Spikes Automatic gear shift
> J. Standard Refrigerator
> Darryl Thomas Cattle roping apparatus
> Rufus J. Weaver Stairclimbing wheelchair
> Morris B. William's Polym. water Reduct.paint
> Paul E Williams Helicopter
> J.B. Winters Fire escape ladder
>
Marcus Houlden
wrote the following to uk.media.tv.misc:
> >>>please be good enough to refrain from posting any more of
> this shite in uk.media.tv.misc? Any other umtm-ers agree?<<<
>
> Yes. 100%.
Killing x-posts between this group and politics groups works for me. I'd
never even heard of Rich Egan until I delibrately told my newsreader to get
one of his posts.
--
Marcus Houlden
"You have one mouth and two ears. Try to use them in roughly that
proportion."
ralph
schoolchildren into the proper 'tracks' to most efficiently allocate
educational resources. Developed empirically from asking a lot of kids a
lot of random questions and keeping the ones that worked. Not the normal
scientific theory development process.
--
Fast as lightning, slick as glass.
Out from Hell on a three day pass.
ralph
with it. As usual, when people have absolutely nothing but their group
identification, then they put everthing they have into that.
David Lentz wrote:
>
> "Kevin J. LaBerge" wrote:
> >
> > What a freaking moron. George Washington Carver for starters... BTW, I'm
> > white you racist bastard.
>
>
> However consider this point, take the list blacks making notable
> achievements and think you will see it consists almost entirely
> of non AFrican blacks. That blacks who no longer lived in
> Africa. Is there a note worthy achievement by black residing in
> AFrica. Maybe.
>
> However, I suggest that the fact the what achievements that have
> been made by blacks seem to be made by ethnic blacks not residing
> in Africa suggests a cultural cause for this disparity.
>
> Further, I will suggest what a major problem is in Africa,
> tribalism. In emigrating out of Africa, by either voluntary or
> involuntary means, tribal identification was destroyed. Whereas
> in in Africa today, tribalism is the major group identification
> and the source of African political and cultural woes.
>
> I offer no solution.
>
ralph
that really happened, didn't it?
Alex Vange wrote:
>
> http://stormfront.org
> "james mcconnell" <zomb...@horrorfan.ANYWEAPONSfsnet.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:8vrqee$vn7$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > they are JUST FILMS (gasp!!)
> > no-one is rewriting history, just making movies. i mean, do you actually
> > believe that aliens have attac....wait, scrap that, you probably do.
> > jamie
> >
> Most movies are leftist propaganda, and movies about history especially
> filled with it. The movies that told the truth were made in NS Germany. My
> favorite is Hitlerjunge Quex.
Jacqui
> > L.F. Brown Horse bridle bit
> > Oscar E. Brown Horseshoe
> > P.B. Dowing Postal letter box
Trying to avoid this thread altogether, but it happened to be first post
up this morning. Mike, are you entirely sure about these three?
Horses have had bits and shoes for thousands of years, and no one can
say who invented them.
And Anthony Trollope invented the pillar box. Quite what constitutes a
"postal letter box" I've no idea, but I imagine it refers to the US
version, quite some time later...
Jac, not really bothered about colour (it was probably nomadic Mongol
tribesmen that invented the bit, btw) but worried about history.
Derek Bell
: This is what it says about delinquents:
: [verse about stoning]
Remember, folks, this is the author of the post that Bob Sims claimed
supported him. Mr. Vange supports stoning delinquent children.
Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie | Socrates would have loved
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| usenet.
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | - J...@bluejo.demon.co.uk
janus
>"MikeW" <Mi...@here.and.now> wrote in message
>news:3A23C6D0...@here.and.now...
>> Some Black inventors for you...
> First of all, how dark were they? Almost all "Black inventors" are at
>least 90% White and look like Whites with a suntan.
>> James S. Adams Aeroplane propelling
> The Wright Brothers invented the airplane. What exactly did Adams do, and
>how does he compare to the Wright Brothers?
>> A.P. Ashbourne Biscuit cutter
> Biscuit cutter?... Biscuit cutter? I was talking about electricity,
>cars, air conditioning, computers etc etc. I don't think I need to say any
>more about this post.
I think it should be pretty obvious that these descriptions are titles
of patent applications. If I were to invent a better moustrap than
ones in current use, my patent application would read: Mousetrap. That
wouldn't mean that I invented the moustrap, per se, but simply that my
application was for a mousetrap.
>> L.C. Bailey Folding bed
>> James A. Bauer Coin changer
>> Andrew Beard Rotary engine
>> Andrew Beard Car coupler
>> G.E. Becket Letter box
>> Alfred Benjamin Stainless steel pads
>> Henry Blair Corn planter
>> Sarah Boone Ironing board
>> Otis Boykin Pace maker controls
>> Guided-missile
>> H. Bradberry Torpedo discharge
>> Charles Brooks Street sweeper
>> Phil Brooks Disposable syringe
>> L.F. Brown Horse bridle bit
>> Marie Brown Home security system
>> Oscar E. Brown Horseshoe
[snipola]
Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.
visit: http://www.ploughshares.ca
Rich Egan
>
>
>
> Deuteronomy 21:18-21
>
> "If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the
> voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have
> chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his
> mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of the city, and
> unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his
city,
> This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice;
he
> is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him
> with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and
> all Israel shall hear, and fear."
Normally, I steerr clear of religous disscussions
here as it's just too personal , but I'm going to
make a comment now.
You must be very careful about using the bible
as a reference . The Old testament was written by
Jews ( Thats how they became the Chosen People)
They have a long history of killing off their sons
that goes back to Abraham. This is why Jews are
so protective of abortion. We must not embrace
this philosophy.
Regards
Rich
Sic Semper Tyrtannis
>
>
White Shite
>intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
>important.
Not true.
> The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
>nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second world
>are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict. It is
>because the White race is on average much more intelligent than the Black
>race.
Whilst the dubious intelligence tests have produced results that Negroids
are not as intelligent as Caucasoids on average, they also without exception
produce the result that Mongoloids are more intelligent than Caucasoids also
on average. Even if this is correct it does not explain the division into
three worlds. Incidentally the first, second and third world are political
divisions not degrees of development.
The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the people in
>India.
Pigmentation is not related to intelligence.
White Shite
var...@cableinet.co.uk
ICQ 88954483
David Lentz
ralph wrote:
>
> Yeah; also 500 years of imperial exploitation might have something to do
> with it. As usual, when people have absolutely nothing but their group
> identification, then they put everthing they have into that.
> David Lentz wrote:
I think you'll find the number closer to two hundred years than
five hundred. The European colonization of Africa was largely
done in the nineteenth century. In addition the problem with
blaming Africa's woe on colonization is that since independence,
AFrican has become less self sufficient, less civilized and has a
lower standard of living. When African nations won their
independence they were self sufficient in food production. Now
what twenty years or so afterward, they no longer are.
If colonization was the problem, you expect to see improvement as
the newly freed nations moved away from colonization. Instead
you see the opposite.
There is an historical parallel, and not a pleasant one at
that. When the Roman left Britain, the standard of living
declined and took two centuries to recover.
David
--
qyra...@ebpurfgre.ee.pbz
Mild and Creamy
>
> The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the people in
> >India.
>
> Pigmentation is not related to intelligence.
>
Pigmentation is related to the amount of vitamin D absorption and the
susceptibility to skin cancer.
As for intelligence if it was the fact that whites were more intelligent
then they would have all progressed at about the same rate. as this is
clearly not the case, and I have no intention of going into detail here. we
then must look to other factor for development and there are two areas, the
society (the English being more open than the French during the industrial
revolution) and the environment, Europe being fertile and so highly
populated. But also to say that all race are exactly the same is also wrong
it is not a question of one being better than another rather that each is
different. It just so happened that the Western Europeans came up with the
most effective culture (this mostly involving war as a push for invention).
Paul Hyett
considered view. Waking from my doze, I hastily scrawled -
>In article <20001128095502...@nso-ff.aol.com>, KDBANGLIA
><kdba...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <aHxwNpAC...@activist.demon.co.uk>, Paul Hyett
>> <pah...@activist.demon.co.uk> writes:
>>
>> >
>> >>important.
>> >
>>
>
How about fire? That must surely have been tamed by our African hominid
ancestors, and they would undoubtedly have been dark-skinned.
>
--
Paul 'US Sitcom Fan' Hyett - The Wild Frame Grabber of the Net!
Website at http://www.activist.demon.co.uk/USsitcoms/
chasvincent
>>>>>
?>>>>>They run most things but not the media,and best of luck to them .
If a jew is chosen for a top job, whats the problem he gets it on merit.
Not through some superstitious mumbo that you would have us believe.
KDBANGLIA
writes:
>> James S. Adams Aeroplane propelling
>
> The Wright Brothers invented the airplane. What exactly did Adams do, and
>how does he compare to the Wright Brothers?
>
Yes but they did it later rather than first ! :-)
Richard.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Mild and Creamy" <c.e.st...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:UiaV5.910$L66....@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
>
>
> Pigmentation is related to the amount of vitamin D absorption and the
> susceptibility to skin cancer.
Your saying if we give the Blacks more vitamin D they will turn into
White people?
>
> As for intelligence if it was the fact that whites were more intelligent
> then they would have all progressed at about the same rate.
Why?
as this is
> clearly not the case,
Why?
>and I have no intention of going into detail here.
You don't even see a general point, let alone details.
we
> then must look to other factor for development and there are two areas,
In other words we "must" look for politcally correct explainations rather
than admit the obvious.
the
> society (the English being more open than the French during the industrial
> revolution) and the environment, Europe being fertile and so highly
> populated. But also to say that all race are exactly the same is also
wrong
> it is not a question of one being better than another rather that each is
> different. It just so happened that the Western Europeans came up with
the
> most effective culture (this mostly involving war as a push for
invention).
>
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developements and discoveries, are the products of the creative
activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their first beginnings
must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of civilization is wholly
dependant on such peoples. Should they perish, all that makes this earth
beautiful will descend with them into the grave."
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on the
blood."
"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science a
nd technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully
justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a superior
type of humanity"
"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture., although this characterizes the exterenal features
of the country, which features strike the eye of European observers on
account of their fundamental difference from us; but the real foundations of
contemporary Japanese life are the enormous scientific and technical
achievements of Europe and America, that is to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated natioanal character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the change
which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a people is
only an effect of the change that had modified its racial substance."
"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and negroids all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for
our humanity would be lost forever."
"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a superior
race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if the
Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should disappear,
all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual needs of the
superior nations to-day would also disappear."
"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined by the
approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only by our duty to
follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing this we have reason to
believe that posterity will have a clearer insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no more
than act as the guardian of public order and tranquillity, so that everybody
can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high mission indeed
to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity which a beneficent
Creator has bestowed on this earth."
Mild and Creamy
> >
> > Pigmentation is related to the amount of vitamin D absorption and the
> > susceptibility to skin cancer.
>
> Your saying if we give the Blacks more vitamin D they will turn into
> White people?
>
No just that white are more efficient at absorbing vitamin D from sunlight
because the environment in the north is not as bright as the southern
hemisphere but this leave us more susceptible to skin cancer. this
evolutionary change is in response to environment and can be said to have
little really effect on any other traits.
the rest I admit is my opinion and I claim to have no great insight into the
such matters. but seriously doubt that there is any great difference
between the races.
> >then must look to other factor for development and there are two areas,
>> In other words we "must" look for politcally correct explainations
rather
>>than admit the obvious.
in other word you must never dismiss the environment as having an effect on
development of any culture and its advancement.
>Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science and
>technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
>exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully
>justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a superior
>type of humanity"
this is wrong the Chinese culture invented gun powder, which is probably the
most important inventions as through the development of the gun we get the
steam engine. although these were invented by the western Europe this was
more down to the culture in the area, as the Chinese had banned its for
various reasons
> "A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
>thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
>manifestations. A disintegrated natioanal character is the inevitable
>consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the change
>which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a people is
>only an effect of the change that had modified its racial substance."
And just how do you ensure racial purity? do you do this by genetics. or
by forefathers. I have a good family line from my mother and can trace my
ancestors back to Hastings. having come over with William at some time they
married a Scottish woman. my forefathers side is less clear but I suspect
from some searching there is some Spanish blood in there. the question is
just how far back you go to prove you are pure? I dislike the notion of
blood defining nationality because it is so easy to give a definition that
and that would result in some people feeling disenfranchised and people who
are not happy are not productive and my well seek to destroy the state. if
people feel that they have a stake in a society then they will work to
advance that society.
>"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior
>race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
I never remember white having a monopoly on the arts. the pyramids were
quite before their time along with lots of things on produced by indigenous
people across the world.
I in no way claim to have the correct explanation but I put forward a point
of view as best I can express is (not being fully versed in the area). your
view may be valid but you must also disprove my view as I must try to
disprove yours. it maybe that this question is never fully decided but all
the better and civilised judgements that I have tell me it is better to
treat all as I would like to be treated by them I think that was in the
bible and every other religion in the world.
Brian Blank
>
>
>http://stormfront.org
>"Kenneth McVay, OBC" <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
>news:8vuub1$1n7u$1...@news.tht.net...
>> In article <b_BU5.14$RO3.3...@news1.i1.net>, Alex Vangel
>>
>> Then why does Mr. VAngel continue to vilify White folks in these
>> very newsgroups?
>>
>> Why has Mr. Vangel openly advocated the murder of White children?
>>
>> Is that how he thinks we are to be "preserved?"
>>
> I said that I agreed with the Bible because it is against the
>homosexual perverts, the feminists, and the Jews.
Please quote any passage from the bible that "s against the
homosexual perverts, the feminists, and the Jews."
As you agree with the Bible, I assume that you only eat kosher food,
keep the Sabbath and all the Jewish Holidays that are mentioned in the
Bible.
Remember that I still awaiting your replies to my previous questions.
Still, I suppose that I should be used to you running away from
questions that you cannot (or will not) answer.
>
> This is what it says about delinquents:
>
>Deuteronomy 21:18-21
>
> "If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the
>voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have
>chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his
>mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of the city, and
>unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his city,
>This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he
>is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him
>with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and
>all Israel shall hear, and fear."
>
Regards,
Brian Blank
White Shite
>> then they would have all progressed at about the same rate.
>
> Why?
Since the whites would all have been intellectually equal. Historically the
"progress" of white civilization was completely unequal, suggesting that the
racial hypothesis alone is insufficient.
> "All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
>technical developements and discoveries, are the products of the creative
>activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their first beginnings
>must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of civilization is wholly
>dependant on such peoples. Should they perish, all that makes this earth
>beautiful will descend with them into the grave."
This is not true. For example the stirrup was invented by the Huns, who have
not been associated with any other inventions.
> "All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
>originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on the
>blood."
No evidence.
> "Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
a
>nd technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
>exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully
>justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a superior
>type of humanity"
This is not true at all. The "Aryan" Indo-European cultures inherited from
other conquered races and their neighbours such as the Rasena, Plegasians,
Egyptians and Hatti as well as their own invaders.
Alan Hope
> Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
Yes, very good, all very high-sounding and all. But Hitler was a
fucking numbskull, old son, as well as being a loon. The man was a
house-painter, for crying out loud. No education. Why should anyone
think he had anything of value to say about ethnology or anything
else?
I'm leaving to one side the fact that he was a loon, a flake and a
madman, which is superfluous to the debate. But never forget he was
also a nut.
As, indeed, are you.
--
AH
Andy
"Alan Hope" <ah...@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:t8kd2t80ortkpdr7j...@4ax.com...
You forgot to mention that he was borderline insane (he fell on the insane
side of the border).
Andy ;-)
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Mild and Creamy" <c.e.st...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:KgiV5.2373$L66....@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
>
> >
> No just that white are more efficient at absorbing vitamin D from sunlight
> because the environment in the north is not as bright as the southern
> hemisphere but this leave us more susceptible to skin cancer. this
> evolutionary change is in response to environment and can be said to have
> little really effect on any other traits.
>
> the rest I admit is my opinion and I claim to have no great insight into
the
> such matters. but seriously doubt that there is any great difference
> between the races.
Why do you have such doubts? The former White nations and Japan are the
first world. Africa and the Black nations are the third world. This is the
way it was before Whites ever went to Africa.
>
> in other word you must never dismiss the environment as having an effect
on
> development of any culture and its advancement.
I don't dismiss things without giving them a hearing. What is so
different about the African environment compared to others?
>
> this is wrong the Chinese culture invented gun powder,
Somebody in China invented it. We don't know if it was a Chinese:
Indo-European: The Mummies of Xinjiang
The Mummies of Xinjiang
In the dry hills of this central Asian province, archeologist have
unearthed more than 100 corpses hat are as much s 4,000 years old.
Astonishingly well preserved - and Caucasian.
One glimpse of the corpses was enough to shock Victor Mair profoundly.
In 1987, Mair, a professor of Chinese at the University of Pennsylvania,
was leading a tour group through a museum in the Chinese city of Urumqi, in
the central Asian province of Xinjiang, when he accidentally strayed into
gloomy, newly opened room. There, under glass, lay the recently
discovered corpses of a family - a man, a woman, and a child of two or
three - each clad in long, dark purple woolen garments and felt boots. Even
today I get chills thinking about that first encounter," says Mair. "The
Chinese said they were 3,000 years old, yet the bodies looked as if they
were buried yesterday."
But the real shock came when Mair looked closely at their faces. In
contrast to most central Asian peoples,these corpses had obvious Caucasian,
or European, features - blond hair, long noses, deep-set eyes, and long
skulls."I was thunderstruck," Mair recalls. "Even though I was supposed
to be leading a tour group, I just couldn't leave that room. The questions
kept nagging at me: Who were these people? How did they get out here at
such an early date?"
The corpses Mair saw that day were just a few of more than 100 dug up by
Chinese archeologists over the past 16 years. All of them are astonishingly
well preserved.They come from four major burial sites scattered between
the arid foothills of the Tian Shan ("Celestial Mountains") in northwest
China and the fringes of the The Taklimakan Desert, some 150 miles due
south. All together, these bodies,dating from about 2000 B.C. to 300 B.C.,
constitute significant addition to the world's catalog of prehistoric
mummies. Unlike the roughly contemporaneous mummies of ancient Egypt, the
Xinjiang mummies were not ruler or nobles; they were not interred in
pyramids or other such monuments,nor were they subjected to deliberate
mummification procedures.
They were preserved merely by being buried in the parched, stony desert,
where daytime temperatures often soar over 100 degrees. In the heat the
bodies were quickly dried, with facial hair, skin, and other tissues
remaining largely intact.
Where exactly did these apparent Caucasians come from? And what were
they doing at remote desert oases in central Asia?
Any answers to these questions will most likely fuel a wide-ranging
debate about the role outsiders played in the rise of Chinese civilization.
As far back as the second century B.C., Chinese texts refer to alien
peoples called the Yuezhi and the Wusun, who lived on China's far western
borders; the texts make it clear that these people were regarded as
troublesome "barbarians." Until recently, scholars have tended to downplay
evidence of any early trade or contact between China and the West,
regarding the development of Chinese civilization as an essentially
homegrown affair scaled off from outside influences; indeed, this view is
still extremely congenial to the present Chinese regime. Yet some
archeologists have begun to argue that these supposed barbarians might have
been responsible for introducing into China such basic items as the wheel
and the first metal objects. Exactly who these central Asian outsiders
might have been, however what language they spoke and where they came from
- is a puzzle. No wonder, then, that scholars see the discovery of the
blond mummies as a sensational new clue...
Most researchers now think the birthplace of horsedrawn vehicles and horse
riding was in the steppes east and west of the Urals rather than in China
or the Near East. As archeologist David Anthony and his colleagues have
shown through microscopic study of ancient horse teeth, horses were already
being harnessed in the Ukraine 6,000 years ago. The Ukraine horses, Anthony
found, show a particular kind of tooth wear identical to that of modern
horses that "fight the bit." The world's earliest high-status vehicles also
seem to have originated in the steppes; recent discoveries of wooden
chariots with elaborate spoked wheels were reported by Anthony to date to
around 2000 B.C. Chariots do not seem to have appeared in China until some
800 years later...
had wagons and well-tailored clothes. Were they mere goat and
sheep farmers? Or did they profit from or even control prehistoric trade
along the route that later became the Silk Road? If so, they probably
helped spread the first wheels and certain metalworking skills into China.
"Ultimately I think our project may end up having tremendous implications
for the origins of Chinese civilization," Mair reflects. "For all their
incredible inventiveness, the ancient Chinese weren't cut off from the
rest of the world, and influences didn't just flow one way, from China
westward."
Unfortunately, economics dictates that answers will be slow in coming.
The Chinese have the money to spare for this work, and Wang and his team
continue to operate on a shoestring. Currently most of the corpses and
artifacts are stored in a damp, crowded basement room at the Institute
of Archeology in Urumqi, in conditions that threaten their continued
preservation. If Mair's plans for a museum can be financed with Western
help, perhaps the mummies can be moved. Then, finally, they'll receive
the study and attention that will ultimately unlock their secrets.
which is probably the
> most important inventions
No way. I could make gunpowder myself, but I couldn't make an airplane or
a TV by myself.
Somebody mixed chemicals together and it blew up. There is no great thought
behind an accident like that. Things like cars are really impressive
inventions.
as through the development of the gun we get the
> steam engine. although these were invented by the western Europe this was
> more down to the culture in the area, as the Chinese had banned its for
> various reasons
>
>
> And just how do you ensure racial purity?
We have laws against racial-intermarriage.
do you do this by genetics. or
> by forefathers. I have a good family line from my mother and can trace my
> ancestors back to Hastings. having come over with William at some time
they
> married a Scottish woman. my forefathers side is less clear but I suspect
> from some searching there is some Spanish blood in there. the question is
> just how far back you go to prove you are pure?
A picture of the person is all we would need.
I dislike the notion of
> blood defining nationality because it is so easy to give a definition that
> and that would result in some people feeling disenfranchised and people
who
> are not happy are not productive and my well seek to destroy the state.
if
> people feel that they have a stake in a society then they will work to
> advance that society.
If they are not White they should be advancing their own society in their
own nation.
>
> I never remember white having a monopoly on the arts. the pyramids were
> quite before their time along with lots of things on produced by
indigenous
> people across the world.
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops, the
builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs of her
tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a bright yellow
stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin is white."
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan. 1939,
p.98
The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in Egypt,
has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971, p.249
The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a vivid
blue-green color of eyes.
A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII, 1889,
p.216
The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London, George
Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored ones.
De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899, p.26
Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red hair.
National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its Splendors,1978
p.103
An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma, University
of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called Wedjat
Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue" in Egyptian.
Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and blond
hair.
Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la Societe
d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red hair and
blue eyes.
Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932, plate
XI
The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee Boreby,
1973 p.94
A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking man
with blond hair.
Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient Egypt.
New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The Great.
It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another picture can
be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the picture on the
jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published showing
paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading personalities of
Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look black and the rest are
hard to classify. All nine mummies look European.
The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed the
Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the face of
the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
It was once painted sunburned red.
Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T. Nelson
1971 p.168
The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper class
women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned while
outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
The information above is part of the information compiled by Phillip
Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street, SE,
Washington, D.C. 20003
> I in no way claim to have the correct explanation but I put forward a
point
> of view as best I can express is (not being fully versed in the area).
your
> view may be valid but you must also disprove my view as I must try to
> disprove yours. it maybe that this question is never fully decided but
all
> the better and civilised judgements that I have tell me it is better to
> treat all as I would like to be treated by them I think that was in the
> bible and every other religion in the world.
>
This is what God says to White people:
Ezra 10:11 "Now therefore make confession unto the Lord God of your Fathers,
and do his pleasure: and separate yourselves from the people of the land,
and from the strange wives."
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"White Shite" <var...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:O6sV5.4111$9Z3.2...@news3.cableinet.net...
>
> Since the whites would all have been intellectually equal.
There is no equality. Some people are stronger than others. Some
people are better looking than others. And some people are certainly smarter
than others.
Historically the
> "progress" of white civilization was completely unequal, suggesting that
the
> racial hypothesis alone is insufficient.
Individuals are not equal and races are not equal.
>
> This is not true. For example the stirrup was invented by the Huns, who
have
> not been associated with any other inventions.
Individuals invent things, not groups. Whites travelled all over the
world. If you are going to claim someone invented something you should give
the persons name.
>
> > "All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
> >originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the
> >blood."
> No evidence.
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops, the
> > "Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art,
science
> a
> >nd technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
> >exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully
> >justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a
superior
> >type of humanity"
>
>
> This is not true at all. The "Aryan" Indo-European cultures inherited from
> other conquered races and their neighbours such as the Rasena, Plegasians,
> Egyptians and Hatti as well as their own invaders.
>
Besides nations, you can also see the differnece in neighborhoods.
The bad part of New York is Harlem. All American cities have their bad areas
and the common denominator is obvious. I admit that many Blacks are nice
people. But I think the White race is something we need to preserve.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"Brian Blank" <Iamnot...@home.spamblocker.com> wrote in message
news:mglb2tkgub7d2jauh...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:31:44 -0600, "Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> Please quote any passage from the bible that "s against the
> homosexual perverts,
Romans 1:26-28
"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their
women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And
likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their
lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and
receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And
even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them
over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;"
Leviticus 20:13
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them
have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their
blood shall be upon them."
>the feminists,
Deuteronomy 22:5
"The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall
a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the
Lord thy God."
1Corinthians 11:3
"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and
the head of the woman is the man"
1Corinthians 11:9
"Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man."
Ephesians 5: 22+23
"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For
the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the
church"
1Timothy 2:12
"But I suffer not a woman to teach, not to usurp authority over the man"
1Peter 3:1
"Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands"
Titus 2: 4+5
"That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands,
to love their children. To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good,
obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed."
>and the Jews."
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk
in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear
of the Jews"
2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save one.
Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then answered
all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews have
dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he ought not to
live any longer."
John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the devil,
and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the
father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
>
> As you agree with the Bible, I assume that you only eat kosher food,
> keep the Sabbath and all the Jewish Holidays that are mentioned in the
> Bible.
There were some changes made in the New Testament, and are no Jewish
holidays in the Bible.
The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are mostly
Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of Judaism
and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish
religion. This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites
and the Khazars became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The real
Israelites changed their religion and became Christians.
Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of
the house of Israel."
He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race, but
this is what He said to the Jews:
John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me"
This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This explains
why Europe became known as Christendom.
The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first
White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are not the
color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the light skin allows
blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the definition of the
word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and see
which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The
Israelites were White.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew
word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical
Jew.
The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It is
the White race that invented all the great things and advanced civilization
on the earth.
The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at
one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White
civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is because they are not
the chosen race and they hate those who really are the chosen race.
>
> Remember that I still awaiting your replies to my previous questions.
They were answered already.
> Still, I suppose that I should be used to you running away from
> questions that you cannot (or will not) answer.
Unfactual.
loz
this newsgroup)
the Bible also says:
"Brothers, do not slander one another. Anyone who speaks against his
brother or slanders him speaks against the law and judges it. When you
judge the law, you are not keeping it, but sitting in judgement of it.
There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and
destroy. But you - who are you to judge your neighbour?" Jams 3:18 (NIV)
others can play that game, Alex, it's possible to find a passage in the
Bible to confirm or condemn almost anything if you know where to look
As an aside - I left the church because of intolerant people, who were
terribly keen to quote condemning scripture at others without trying to
understand them, and have found more people who behave as christians outside
the church than I ever encountered within it
Alex Vange <va...@i1.net> wrote in message
news:iUBV5.18$eO5.2...@news1.i1.net...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.215 / Virus Database: 101 - Release Date: 11/17/00
loz
loz <mer...@localdial.com> wrote in message
news:3a26f...@news.guernsey.net...
MikeW
Alex Vange wrote:
*stuff*
Bet ya cant tell the colour of people who post to usenet, apart from maybe the
name.
If you are correct you should be able to identify them quite easily.
But, I think you not be able to do this.
Mike Warren.
Ian F.
>sorry that reference should have been James 4:11 - 12
If people are going to continue responding to this racist drivel on umtm,
at least snip the idiot's ramblings before posting a one-line
"contribution" such as the above. Thank you.
Ian
janus
[...]
> Besides nations, you can also see the differnece in neighborhoods.
>The bad part of New York is Harlem. All American cities have their bad areas
>and the common denominator is obvious. I admit that many Blacks are nice
>people. But I think the White race is something we need to preserve.
If you're worried about preserving the White race, have yourself a big
family. Teach your kids your values and hope they take a similar
attitude when they reach adulthood.
There. That's _all_ you can do to preseve the White race. Everything.
jz
loz
I take offence at your snipe at my "contribution", Ian. Although I may not
agree with some postings on newsgroups, I was under the impression that the
reasoning behind newsgroups was that they are a platform for discussion.
Are we to let racist and homophobic comment go unchallenged?
Ian F. <i...@jenniferanistonc2u.co.uk> wrote in message
news:igJV5.729$R77.1...@nnrp4.clara.net...
> loz wrote in message <3a26f...@news.guernsey.net>...
>
> >sorry that reference should have been James 4:11 - 12
>
> If people are going to continue responding to this racist drivel on umtm,
> at least snip the idiot's ramblings before posting a one-line
> "contribution" such as the above. Thank you.
>
> Ian
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.215 / Virus Database: 101 - Release Date: 11/16/00
Mike Plowman
wrote:
>Apologies for the faux pas, but, as I said, I am new to these newsgroups
>
>I take offence at your snipe at my "contribution", Ian. Although I may not
>agree with some postings on newsgroups, I was under the impression that the
>reasoning behind newsgroups was that they are a platform for discussion.
>Are we to let racist and homophobic comment go unchallenged?
>
Of course not, but there are also acceptable ways of presenting your
posts. Look up a Usenet netiquette FAQ for guidelines.
Taking the trouble to snip quoted text where possible and not top
posting (as you did in your reply) makes your posts far more likely to
be read and will stop follow ups being about your posting format
rather than contact.
We're all new to newsgroups at some point and most of us have made
this kind of mistake early on.
Hope that helps
--
Mike Plowman
Coronation Street Visual Updates - www.csvu.net
"There was life before Coronation Street,
but it didn't amount to much." Russel Harty
David the Twat
Alan Hope <ah...@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:t8kd2t80ortkpdr7j...@4ax.com...
> And Alex Vange saith unto uk.media.tv.misc:
>
> > Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
>
> Yes, very good, all very high-sounding and all. But Hitler was a
> fucking numbskull, old son, as well as being a loon. The man was a
> house-painter, for crying out loud. No education. Why should anyone
> think he had anything of value to say about ethnology or anything
> else?
Yeh - but he was 'clever' enough to fool millions of German twats, by the
use of exceptional cinematic propoganda, wasn't he? He was democratically
elected by the same arseholes, so maybe a case of a 'loon' with attitude?
Something like you in fact
D
Alex Vange
"loz" <mer...@localdial.com> wrote in message
news:3a26f...@news.guernsey.net...
>
> the Bible also says:
> "Brothers, do not slander one another. Anyone who speaks against his
> brother or slanders him speaks against the law and judges it. When you
> judge the law, you are not keeping it, but sitting in judgement of it.
> There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and
> destroy. But you - who are you to judge your neighbour?" Jams 3:18 (NIV)
I don't recall judging anyone. The government should judge people. I
don't mean the government we have now, but we should have a good government
with judges and also executioners.
Romans 13:4 "But if though do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth
not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God"
>
> others can play that game, Alex, it's possible to find a passage in the
> Bible to confirm or condemn almost anything if you know where to look
If that is your attitude then Christianity can't mean anything to you.
You say it can mean anything people want it to mean. Maybe that is the way
it is today. That is why we should support National Socialism. The Christain
principles in it are clear cut.
The Nazis outlawed abortion. They outlawed homosexual perversion and
feminism. They outlawed pornagraphy and prostitution. They removed the race
of anti-Christs from controlling the media. They rejected both the madness
of Communism and the greed of Capitalism.
>
> As an aside - I left the church because of intolerant people, who were
> terribly keen to quote condemning scripture at others without trying to
> understand them, and have found more people who behave as christians
outside
> the church than I ever encountered within it
>
I didn't say I supported churches. The only thing I agree with is the
Bible and National Socialism.
Alex Vange
"loz" <mer...@localdial.com> wrote in message
news:3a279...@news.guernsey.net...
> Are we to let racist
by Thomas Jackson
There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater horror
than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is
thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press and public have become
so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most
spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of
American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off. For example, when a White
Georgetown Law School student reported earlier this year that black students
are not as qualified as White students, it set off a booming, national
controversy about "racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he
would have attracted far less attention and criticism.
Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full alert
for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach against it,
America is said to be racked with it, but just what is racism?
Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word.
They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock is superior
to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race.
When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this.
Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding
what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the
current dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal. Despite clear evidence to
the contrary, all races have been declared to be equally talented and hard-
working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely
wrong but evil.
The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If blacks,
for example, are equal to Whites in every way, what accounts for their
poverty, criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of racial
differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black
failure is White racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone,
and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism. Nothing else
could be keeping them in such an abject state.
All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic. Any
explanation for black failure that does not depend on White wickedness
threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences.
Thus, even if today's Whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress
blacks, yesterday's Whites must have oppressed them. If Whites do not
consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them Unconsciously. If no
obviously racist individuals can be identified, then societal institutions
must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America, there
simply must be millions of White people we do not know about, who are
working day and night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality
leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some
fashion, an indictment of White people.
The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to believe
that the only explanation for non-White failure is White racism, every time
a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, White
society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or
misbehavior by non-Whites is standing proof that White society is riddled
with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed
in life at exactly the same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition,
thwarting and oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to
strange conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be
committed almost exclusively by White people. Indeed, a black congressman
from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit,
have argued that only White people can be racist. Likewise, in 1987, the
affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued a
company pamphlet in which she explained that all Whites are racist and that
only Whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained
without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?
Although some blacks and liberal Whites concede that non-Whites can,
perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-Whites have been forced
into it as self-defense because of centuries of White oppression. What
appears to be non-White racism is so understandable and forgivable that it
hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not an act is called racism
depends on the race of the racist. What would surely be called racism when
done by Whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The reverse
is also true.
Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost tedious
to list them: When a White man kills a black man and uses the word "nigger"
while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and the nation beats its
collective breast; when members of the black Yahweh cult carry out ritual
murders of random Whites, the media are silent (see AR of March, 1991).
College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-Whites as "racist,"
but ignore scurrilous attacks on Whites.
At election time, if 60 percent of the White voters vote for a White
candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for the black opponent,
it is Whites who are accused of racial bias. There are 107 "historically
black" colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name
of diversity, but all historically White colleges must be forcibly
integrated in the name of... the same thing. To resist would be racist.
"Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything that
could be construed as an expression of White pride is a form of hatred. It
is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect school instruction
and driver's tests in their own languages, whereas for native Americans to
ask them to learn English is racist.
Blatant anti-White prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is now the
law of the land. Anything remotely like affirmative action, if practiced in
favor of Whites, would be attacked as despicable favoritism.
All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs and caucuses are
thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club or
association expressly for Whites is by definition racist. The National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly
for black advantage but is a respected "civil rights" organization. The
National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) campaigns
merely for equal treatment of all races, but is said to be viciously racist.
At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action have set
up student unions for Whites, analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, etc,
and have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the White
students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a
minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones that
non-Whites have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed, in America today,
any club not specifically formed to be a White enclave but whose members
simply happen all to be White is branded as racist.
Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality of
American racism is "celebration of diversity." It has begun to dawn on a few
people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of Whites (and
sometimes men), and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howard
University be made more diverse by admitting Whites, Hispanics, or Asians.
No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University in San Jose (CA)
would benefit from the diversity of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one
suggests that the Black Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the
NAACP or the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from
a lack of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to
celebrate homogeneity. And yet any all-White group - a company, a town, a
school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to suffer from a crippling lack
of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as possible. Only when Whites
have been reduced to a minority has "diversity" been achieved.
Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we are so
often asked to do, is no different from deploring an excess of Whites. In
fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess of Whites. Our
current immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90 percent
of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-White. The several million
illegal immigrants that enter the country every year are virtually all
non-White. It would be racist not to be grateful for this laudable
contribution to "diversity." It is, of course, only White nations that are
called upon to practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to
imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant dispossession of
this kind.
What if the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated citizens
across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into thinking that
Mexico was being "culturally enriched?" What if the state of Chihuahua were
losing its majority population to poor Whites who demanded that schools be
taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of July, who
demanded the right to vote even if they weren't citizens, who clamored for
"affirmative action" in jobs and schooling?
Would Mexico - or any other non-White nation - tolerate this kind of
cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet White Americans are
supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians entering their
country as a priceless cultural gift. They are supposed to "celebrate" their
own loss of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own dispossession,
for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist.
There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non- Whites
advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of "hating"
another group. Blacks can join "civil rights" groups and Hispanics can be
activists without fear of being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can
agitate openly for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of
whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds without anyone
ever suggesting that they are "anti-white."
Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to affirmative
action to be called haters. They need only subject racial policies that are
clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called racists. Should they actually
go so far as to say that they prefer the company of their own kind, that
they wish to be left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage,
they are irredeemably wicked and hateful.
Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race
relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the company of their own
kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct from those of
the whole, and to work openly for group advantage. None of this is thought
to be racist. At the same time, whites must also champion the racial
interests of non-whites. They must sacrifice their own future on the altar
of "diversity" and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to
encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European people and
culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in the simplest possible
terms, White people are cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit
racial and cultural suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.
Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United States is perfectly
natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to love one's people
and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are
doubtless astonished to discover that simply by setting foot in the United
States they are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born
whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them? Is it surprising that
they should want their languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters
to take possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the
once-great people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and
is prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for
it, why should Mexicans and Cambodians complain?
No, it is the White enterprise in the United States that is unnatural,
unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let themselves be
convinced that it is racist merely to object to dispossession, much less to
work for their own interests. Never in the history of the world has a
dominant people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its
wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that
there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away
to others its place in history. Of all the races in America, only whites
have been tricked into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is
racism. Only whites are ever told that a love for their own people is
somehow "hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their
own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men love their families
more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they hate their
neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no ill will towards
non-whites. They only wish to be left alone to participate in the unfolding
of their racial and cultural destinies.
What whites in America are being asked to do is therefore utterly unnatural.
They are being asked to devote themselves to the interests of other races
and to ignore the interests of their own. This is like asking a man to
forsake his own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do
otherwise would be "racist."
What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any dictionary is
likely to say. It is any opposition by whites to official policies of racial
preference for non-whites. It is any preference by whites for their own
people and culture. It is any resistance by whites to the idea of becoming a
minority people. It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in
short, any of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined
nations since the beginning of history - but only so long as the aspirations
are those of whites.
>and homophobic comment go unchallenged?
Romans 1:26-28
Alex Vange
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"MikeW" <Mi...@here.and.now> wrote in message
news:3A27518F...@here.and.now...
>
>
> Alex Vange wrote:
>
> *stuff*
>
> Bet ya cant tell the colour of people who post to usenet, apart from maybe
the
> name.
Why is this important?
>
> If you are correct you should be able to identify them quite easily.
Why?
>
> But, I think you not be able to do this.
>
Correct
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org
"David Gehrig" <zem...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3A213F5F...@earthlink.net...
> Paul Hyett wrote:
>
> > Disney? What the hell are you talking about - are they inserting
> > subliminal messages in Mickey Mouse cartoons? :)
>
> Yes, haven't you heard? The Jews have taken over Disney, and
> they have renamed the characters "Mischa Mouse" and "Dovidl Duck."
> "Goofy" they just removed two letters of: "Goy."
>
They didn't rename the characters. But the Jews did in fact take over
Disney.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment". It is
subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are from the Aug
1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power
and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential
pruduction executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a
heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a
gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic attitudes, now
features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
Alan Hope
>Alan Hope <ah...@skynet.be> wrote in message
>news:t8kd2t80ortkpdr7j...@4ax.com...
>> And Alex Vange saith unto uk.media.tv.misc:
>> > Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
>> Yes, very good, all very high-sounding and all. But Hitler was a
>> fucking numbskull, old son, as well as being a loon. The man was a
>> house-painter, for crying out loud. No education. Why should anyone
>> think he had anything of value to say about ethnology or anything
>> else?
>Yeh - but he was 'clever' enough to fool millions of German twats, by the
>use of exceptional cinematic propoganda, wasn't he?
I think you'll find that was Goebbels.
>He was democratically
>elected
I think you'll find that was a bit dodgy.
>by the same arseholes,
I think you'll find the Germans kicking the arses of the English ever
since. Even the World Cup in 66 was rigged, it now turns out.
>so maybe a case of a 'loon' with attitude?
>Something like you in fact
So do you admire me as much as you admire Hitler?
--
AH
loz
> I don't recall judging anyone. The government should judge people. I
> don't mean the government we have now, but we should have a good
government
> with judges and also executioners.
read the quote again, Alex.
As you seem to take what the Bible says as literal (and say that you agree
with it) then surely it is saying that there is only 'one Lawgiver and
Judge' and that's not elected government or executioners
> > others can play that game, Alex, it's possible to find a passage in the
> > Bible to confirm or condemn almost anything if you know where to look
>
> If that is your attitude then Christianity can't mean anything to you.
> You say it can mean anything people want it to mean.
No, what I said was that you can use the Bible (as well as any other text)
to support your arguments if you take it out of context or only use selected
parts.
Brian Blank
>
>
>http://stormfront.org
>"Brian Blank" <Iamnot...@home.spamblocker.com> wrote in message
>news:mglb2tkgub7d2jauh...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:31:44 -0600, "Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>
>> Please quote any passage from the bible that "s against the
>> homosexual perverts,
Interesting bit of snipping there Alex. Your quote was: " I said that
I agreed with the Bible because it is against the homosexual perverts,
the feminists, and the Jews."
And I asked you to show me a where the Bible is against the homosexual
perverts, the feminists and the Jews. I know your command of English
is not very good so I will try this again and read this very slowly.
Where does the Bible say it is against the homosexual perverts, the
feminists and the Jews? Where are these three items grouped together?
Where do the words homosexual perverts or feminists appear in the
Bible?
>
>Romans 1:26-28
>
> "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their
>women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And
>likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their
>lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and
>receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And
>even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them
>over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;"
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>Leviticus 20:13
>
> "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them
>have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their
>blood shall be upon them."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>>the feminists,
>
>
>Deuteronomy 22:5
>
> "The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall
>a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the
>Lord thy God."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>1Corinthians 11:3
>
> "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and
>the head of the woman is the man"
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>1Corinthians 11:9
>
> "Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>Ephesians 5: 22+23
>
> "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For
>the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the
>church"
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>1Timothy 2:12
>
> "But I suffer not a woman to teach, not to usurp authority over the man"
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>1Peter 3:1
>
> "Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands"
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>
>Titus 2: 4+5
>
> "That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands,
>to love their children. To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good,
>obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>
>>and the Jews."
>
>John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk
>in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear
>of the Jews"
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save one.
>Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
>multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then answered
>all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews have
>dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he ought not to
>live any longer."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the devil,
>and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
>beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
>When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the
>father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
And is this referring to "homosexual perverts, feminists and Jews?"
>
>>
>> As you agree with the Bible, I assume that you only eat kosher food,
>> keep the Sabbath and all the Jewish Holidays that are mentioned in the
>> Bible.
>
> There were some changes made in the New Testament, and are no Jewish
>holidays in the Bible.
Oh really? What were the changes? Try this Jewish holiday for
size....the Sabbath. You do keep the Sabbath as a HOLY DAY, right?
Another that is in the Bible is Passover. I assume that you both
observe Passover (as did Jesus) and eat only foods that are kosher for
Passover during that time? You do remember that Jesus went to
Jerusalem for the Passover?
>
> The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are mostly
>Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of Judaism
>and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Stuff and nonsense. The Khazar story accounts for a small percentage
of the existing Ashekanazi Jews. It does not account for the majority.
And what about the Sephardic Jews?
>
>
> Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish
>religion. This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites
>and the Khazars became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The real
>Israelites changed their religion and became Christians.
OK, let me see if I understand you correctly. The entire population of
Israel converted from Judaism to Christianity and at the same time,
moved en masse to Europe leaving Israel and Judah empty. Some time
later, another grouping of peoples (the Khazars) suddenly decided that
they would adopt the Jewish religion.
Small hole in your logic. If the Jews all became Christian and moved
to Europe, where did the Khazars find out about Judaism and how to
convert to it? Where did the Sephardic Jews come from?
>
> Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of
>the house of Israel."
The house of Israel being? You do know that this refers to the
descendants of Jacob? What religion was practiced by "the house of
Israel?"
>
>He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race, but
>this is what He said to the Jews:
What makes you say that sheep are a symbol for the chosen race? To my
mind it represents a flock.
>
>John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
>said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me"
>
> This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This explains
>why Europe became known as Christendom.
Yes, the entire population of Israel left the country and went to
Europe, which was totally unpopulated at the time. Thus the Israelites
built Christianity in that empty continent. That must have confused
the Romans.
>
> The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first
>White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are not the
>color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the light skin allows
>blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the definition of the
>word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
>
> "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
>made) red (ruddy)."
Garbage, it is not the definition and you know it. You refuse flatly
to answer my questions about why you continue to lie about this. You
are a coward as well as a liar.
I am still awaiting your proof that Jews and Asians are unable to
blush.
>
> This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and see
>which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The
>Israelites were White.
Probably. By those standards, so are the modern day Jews.
>
> The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew
>word "ruddy":
>
> "reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
>
> David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical
>Jew.
I am still awaiting your proof that Jews and Asians do no blush.
Whilst you are about it show proof that Jews do not have rosy cheeks
or red hair.
>
> The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It is
>the White race that invented all the great things and advanced civilization
>on the earth.
The Bible is not concerned with inventions. It does not say that the
Israelites would be a blessing to the world.
>
> The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
No it doesn't. You lie again.
>
>Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
>are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
This does not say that Jews are impostors. It is referring to those
that say that they are Jews but are not. I know your comprehension
skills are minuscule but do try to read (and understand) what you are
quoting.
>
> Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
>
> John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
>walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
Plainly this refers to specific individuals. Or are you saying that
there were no Jews in Galilee? What religion was Jesus? What religion
was Joseph and Mary? What religion did Jesus' disciples practice? Did
they seek to kill Jesus?
>
> The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at
>one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White
>civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is because they are not
>the chosen race and they hate those who really are the chosen race.
Show one quotation from the Bible that mentions the words "chosen
race?"
>
>>
>> Remember that I still awaiting your replies to my previous questions.
>
> They were answered already.
Nope you ran away, just like you will here because you cannot answer
the questions.
>
>> Still, I suppose that I should be used to you running away from
>> questions that you cannot (or will not) answer.
>
> Unfactual.
Yes your postings are. That at least you got correct.
>
>
>
Regards,
Brian Blank
Brian Blank
>
>
>http://stormfront.org
>"White Shite" <var...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:O6sV5.4111$9Z3.2...@news3.cableinet.net...
>>
>> Since the whites would all have been intellectually equal.
>
> There is no equality. Some people are stronger than others. Some
>people are better looking than others. And some people are certainly smarter
>than others.
Actually this is true. Don't you wish you were as smart as others?
>
> Historically the
>> "progress" of white civilization was completely unequal, suggesting that
>the
>> racial hypothesis alone is insufficient.
>
> Individuals are not equal and races are not equal.
>>
>> This is not true. For example the stirrup was invented by the Huns, who
>have
>> not been associated with any other inventions.
>
> Individuals invent things, not groups. Whites travelled all over the
>world. If you are going to claim someone invented something you should give
>the persons name.
You are infatuated with things aren't you? Solid things. Never ideas.
By the way, of course groups can invent things. Why do you think
corporations have research departments? Why do government agencies
such as NASA employ many people to think up and develop "inventions."
Give the name of the person who developed the Space Shuttle.
>
>>
>> > "All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
>> >originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
>the
>> >blood."
>
>> No evidence.
>
>"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops, the
>builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs of her
>tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a bright yellow
>stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin is white."
So? That is a painting. If Picasso paints somebody with two eyes on
one side of their head, does that prove that the model had two eyes on
one side of their head.
>
>Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan. 1939,
>p.98
>
> The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in Egypt,
>has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Painting.
>
>Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971, p.249
>
> The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Wow. So that proves what exactly?
>
>Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
>
> "A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a vivid
>blue-green color of eyes.
So?
>
>A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
>Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49
>
> The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.
So?
>
>Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68
>
>Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.
So? Egyptians were known to use henna to color their hair.
>
>Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
>Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
>Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII, 1889,
>p.216
>
>The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.
You said this above. So what?
>
>Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London, George
>Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99
>
> A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored ones.
Wow, one out of many!
>
>De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899, p.26
>
> Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red hair.
So what?
>
>National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its Splendors,1978
>p.103
>
> An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.
And this proves what exactly?
>
>Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma, University
>of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53
>
> A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called Wedjat
>Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue" in Egyptian.
So you believe in the Pagan Egyptian Gods?
>
> Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and blond
>hair.
Painting.
>
>Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la Societe
>d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739
>
> Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red hair and
>blue eyes.
>
>Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932, plate
>XI
>
> The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.
So you believe in the Pagan Egyptian Gods?
>
>Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee Boreby,
>1973 p.94
>
> A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking man
>with blond hair.
Painting.
>
>Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient Egypt.
>New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65
>
> Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The Great.
>It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another picture can
>be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the picture on the
>jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
>
> A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published showing
>paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading personalities of
>Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look black and the rest are
>hard to classify. All nine mummies look European.
>
> The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
>European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed the
>Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the face of
>the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.
>
>Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67
>
> It was once painted sunburned red.
>
>Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T. Nelson
>1971 p.168
>
> The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper class
>women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned while
>outside under the burning Egyptian sun.
Makes sense.
>
> The information above is part of the information compiled by Phillip
>Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street, SE,
>Washington, D.C. 20003
Now according to you, the Israelites left Israel and went to the empty
continent of Europe and there founded Christendom. Now you are saying
that they were actually in Egypt and not in Israel?
>
>
>> > "Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art,
>science
>> a
>> >nd technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
>> >exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully
>> >justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a
>superior
>> >type of humanity"
>>
>>
>> This is not true at all. The "Aryan" Indo-European cultures inherited from
>> other conquered races and their neighbours such as the Rasena, Plegasians,
>> Egyptians and Hatti as well as their own invaders.
>>
> Besides nations, you can also see the differnece in neighborhoods.
>The bad part of New York is Harlem. All American cities have their bad areas
>and the common denominator is obvious. I admit that many Blacks are nice
>people. But I think the White race is something we need to preserve.
I notice you refused to address White Shite's paragraph.
>
>
Regards,
Brian Blank
Paul Hammond
Alex Vange wrote in message ...
So, in a Jewish magazine, there is an article about the Jewish people
who are doing well in Disney. Is there some kind of analysis of
percentages?
Seems to me that this is much like an alumnis magazine, which would
be full of stories about the old Harvardians who are now successful
lawyers, or high ups in show biz. Not really all that sinister, when you
think about it.
So, what exactly is your worry about this situation, that Disney and
other movie studios are employing people who also happen to be
jewish? Presumably, the studios are hiring on the basis of resumes
and experience. What's your problem?
Paul Hammond
Brian Blank
>
>
>http://stormfront.org
>"loz" <mer...@localdial.com> wrote in message
>news:3a26f...@news.guernsey.net...
>>
>> the Bible also says:
>> "Brothers, do not slander one another. Anyone who speaks against his
>> brother or slanders him speaks against the law and judges it. When you
>> judge the law, you are not keeping it, but sitting in judgement of it.
>> There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and
>> destroy. But you - who are you to judge your neighbour?" Jams 3:18 (NIV)
>
> I don't recall judging anyone. The government should judge people. I
>don't mean the government we have now, but we should have a good government
>with judges and also executioners.
>
>Romans 13:4 "But if though do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth
>not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God"
>
>>
>> others can play that game, Alex, it's possible to find a passage in the
>> Bible to confirm or condemn almost anything if you know where to look
>
> If that is your attitude then Christianity can't mean anything to you.
>You say it can mean anything people want it to mean. Maybe that is the way
>it is today. That is why we should support National Socialism. The Christain
>principles in it are clear cut.
>
> The Nazis outlawed abortion. They outlawed homosexual perversion and
>feminism. They outlawed pornagraphy and prostitution. They removed the race
>of anti-Christs from controlling the media. They rejected both the madness
>of Communism and the greed of Capitalism.
>
>>
>> As an aside - I left the church because of intolerant people, who were
>> terribly keen to quote condemning scripture at others without trying to
>> understand them, and have found more people who behave as christians
>outside
>> the church than I ever encountered within it
>>
> I didn't say I supported churches. The only thing I agree with is the
>Bible and National Socialism.
Is this the same Bible that according to you says that Israel is a
race?
If so, it is about time that you actually read it.
>
Regards,
Brian Blank
Ian F.
>Apologies for the faux pas, but, as I said, I am new to these newsgroups
No problem.
>I take offence at your snipe at my "contribution", Ian. Although I may
not
>agree with some postings on newsgroups, I was under the impression that
the
>reasoning behind newsgroups was that they are a platform for discussion.
>Are we to let racist and homophobic comment go unchallenged?
The discussion, if you can call a racist rant such as the one by these
f*uckwits a discussion, has no relevance to uk.media.tv.misc.
These people are cranks, possibly psychotic ones too, and as such may be
best ignored. Feel free to comment on their drivel if you wish, but the
more we go back at them, the more they prattle on.
Ian
--
~Take Jennifer Aniston out before you e-mail me~
"You can't have everything. Where would you put it?"
(Steven Wright)
David the Twat
> And David the Twat saith unto uk.media.tv.misc:
>
> >Alan Hope <ah...@skynet.be> wrote in message
> >news:t8kd2t80ortkpdr7j...@4ax.com...
> >> And Alex Vange saith unto uk.media.tv.misc:
>
> >> > Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
>
> >> Yes, very good, all very high-sounding and all. But Hitler was a
> >> fucking numbskull, old son, as well as being a loon. The man was a
> >> house-painter, for crying out loud. No education. Why should anyone
> >> think he had anything of value to say about ethnology or anything
> >> else?
>
> >Yeh - but he was 'clever' enough to fool millions of German twats, by the
>
> I think you'll find that was Goebbels.
Yes, I know that he was the 'Minister of Propaganda', but I was obviously
referring to Hitler and henchmen, but guessed that you would immediately
seize on any feeble opportunity to discredit my points.
>
> >He was democratically
> >elected
>
> I think you'll find that was a bit dodgy.
>
> >by the same arseholes,
>
> I think you'll find the Germans kicking the arses of the English ever
> since. Even the World Cup in 66 was rigged, it now turns out.
Who gives a toss about this pathetic old hobby horse of a football match,
played some 34 years ago, as if it's got anything to do with the real world?
The Germans have centuries of 'Aryan pride', manifesting itself into the
horrific wars, provoked by their territorialism. Their inner psyche has
always held itself to be the 'master race' and they should still hang their
collective heads in shame, at the memory of former generations - just like
the sadistic Japanese etc.
>
> >so maybe a case of a 'loon' with attitude?
> >Something like you in fact
>
> So do you admire me as much as you admire Hitler?
Who said I 'admired' the wacko? That goes for you too.
D
White Shite
>> Individuals are not equal and races are not equal.
Do you see various white subraces as unequal, with the southern, darker
skinned white races more inclined to civilization?
>>"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops, the
>>builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs of her
>>tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a bright yellow
>>stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin is white."
The Egyptians settled the Nile from the Sahara. Berbers are white. I have no
problem accepting that the Egyptians were white and only black racists
disagree. However there was always a black influence and Egyptian
civilization was influenced from the South. This black influence did not
weaken Egypt since it was always influencing Egypt.
I notice that your responses are not relevant to my post (again).
White Shite
var...@cableinet.co.uk
ICQ 88954483
White Shite
>horrific wars, provoked by their territorialism. Their inner psyche has
>always held itself to be the 'master race' and they should still hang their
>collective heads in shame, at the memory of former generations - just like
>the sadistic Japanese etc.
Cross out Germans and add English.