Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: First British casualty in Afghanistan this year

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Saved

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:56:06 PM1/4/10
to
To bad your buddy was not there, he could have
prevented this.
 
Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message news:hhtdth$q4g$2...@news.eternal-september.org...On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:21:33 -0500, Saved wrote:


I have a far deeper understanding of how radicalisation can occur in
people and the feelings of despair and disenfranchisement that can drive
them to commit extreme acts than you could hope to acquire in a thousand
fucking lifetimes, you know-nothing cunt.



A soldier on foot patrol in Helmand province has become the first
British casualty in Afghanistan in 2010.

Last year was the bloodiest for British troops since the Falklands War
in 1982 with 108 soldiers dying in the battle against the Taleban.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the soldier, from the 1st Battalion
The Royal Anglian Regiment, died in an explosion while patrolling the
Nad-e Ali area, in Helmand yesterday. His next of kin have been informed.

Lieutenant Colonel David Wakefield, the spokesman for Task Force
Helmand, said: “His dauntless courage and his sacrifice will not be
forgotten.”

Ref:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/Afghanistan/article6975022.ece

--
Dave (Sometimes man stumbles over the truth ...... Sir Winston Churchill)

(William Regal)

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 3:19:27 PM1/5/10
to
> The claim is false.

Looks like he hit the nail on the head again!


"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message

news:hhvv3e$dvk$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:45:36 -0500, naved wrote:
>
>>
>> "SeaNymph" <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in message
>> news:hhubfd$m0v$1...@news.eternal-september.org...


>>
>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message

>> news:hhts6n$880$2...@news.eternal-september.org...


>>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:31:04 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
>>>> news:hhtdth$q4g$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:21:33 -0500, Saved wrote:
>>>>>

>>>>>> You are one dumb queer bastard when it comes to understanding jihad.


>>>>>
>>>>> I have a far deeper understanding of how radicalisation can occur in
>>>>> people and the feelings of despair and disenfranchisement that can
>>>>> drive them to commit extreme acts than you could hope to acquire in a
>>>>> thousand fucking lifetimes, you know-nothing cunt.
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>> I think people might be interested to know how you have come by such
>>>> information.
>>>
>>> That wouldn't surprise me.
>>
>> Is there some reason you don't want to discuss your claim?

> The claim is false.

So, you imply that, all my life, you've been standing right beside me,
watching my deeds, seeing the things I was experiencing, reading over my
shoulder?

Funny, I've never noticed you there.

Prick.


--
Las autoridades sanitarias advierten:
Fumar perjudica gravemente su salud
y la de los que están a su alrededor

§nühw¤£f

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 5:29:12 PM1/5/10
to
Ok ladies, listen up and listen good. Look at the piccy on this site and
you'l start gettin klewage for *why* people don't just gollyfucking-gee
like us:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/kpete/11776

That one photo says everything that needs to be said on the subject, now
and forever.

Have a cheeful motherfucking goddamed day.
Dis-fucking-smissed!

--
http://www.democracyforamerica.com/
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

Aardvark

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 6:10:33 PM1/5/10
to
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:29:12 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:

> Ok ladies, listen up and listen good. Look at the piccy on this site and
> you'l start gettin klewage for *why* people don't just gollyfucking-gee
> like us:
> http://journals.democraticunderground.com/kpete/11776

High eloquence in a small package, mate.

I could relate my personal experiences to the fuckers here (scorched-earth
is where I'm posting from) till I'm blue in the fucking face and they'd
still call me men-fuckin-dacious.

Thanks for posting that.

--
Algy met a bear
The bear was bulgy
The bulge was Algy

§nühw¤£f

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 10:59:10 AM1/6/10
to
Its the human face of war. What gets filtered down to 'merikins and you
Englishers is sterilized by a complicit corporate media that obeys the
will of their masters. And their masters know that if people could
actually see the effects of this so-called "war on terror", they
would'nt support it.

Aardvark

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 3:55:27 PM1/6/10
to
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:59:10 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:29:12 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>>
>>> Ok ladies, listen up and listen good. Look at the piccy on this site
>>> and you'l start gettin klewage for *why* people don't just
>>> gollyfucking-gee like us:
>>> http://journals.democraticunderground.com/kpete/11776
>>
>> High eloquence in a small package, mate.
>>
>> I could relate my personal experiences to the fuckers here
>> (scorched-earth is where I'm posting from) till I'm blue in the fucking
>> face and they'd still call me men-fuckin-dacious.
>>
>> Thanks for posting that.
>>
> Its the human face of war. What gets filtered down to 'merikins and you
> Englishers is sterilized by a complicit corporate media that obeys the
> will of their masters.

Fuck. I have a habit of searching out and finding the ugliest of truths,
just as I expect that you do, mate.

Having said that, though, our mainstream media tend to give a more
balanced and less sanitised view of things than that in the US. I'm sure
you're aware of that already :-)

> And their masters know that if people could
> actually see the effects of this so-called "war on terror", they
> would'nt support it.

What's more, you can tell them that and they'll tell you you're a kook and
a liar.

§nühw¤£f

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 5:59:49 PM1/6/10
to
Aardvark wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:59:10 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:29:12 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok ladies, listen up and listen good. Look at the piccy on this site
>>>> and you'l start gettin klewage for *why* people don't just
>>>> gollyfucking-gee like us:
>>>> http://journals.democraticunderground.com/kpete/11776
>>> High eloquence in a small package, mate.
>>>
>>> I could relate my personal experiences to the fuckers here
>>> (scorched-earth is where I'm posting from) till I'm blue in the fucking
>>> face and they'd still call me men-fuckin-dacious.
>>>
>>> Thanks for posting that.
>>>
>> Its the human face of war. What gets filtered down to 'merikins and you
>> Englishers is sterilized by a complicit corporate media that obeys the
>> will of their masters.
>
> Fuck. I have a habit of searching out and finding the ugliest of truths,
> just as I expect that you do, mate.
>
Truth is truth. Often though it is unpleasant in the extreme.

> Having said that, though, our mainstream media tend to give a more
> balanced and less sanitised view of things than that in the US. I'm sure
> you're aware of that already :-)
>

The venerable "Beeb" has a reputation to uphold and its nice that its
managing to still deliver some hard-hitting journalism.


>> And their masters know that if people could
>> actually see the effects of this so-called "war on terror", they
>> would'nt support it.
>
> What's more, you can tell them that and they'll tell you you're a kook and
> a liar.
>
>

Filters, rose colored glasses...all coping mechanisms to protect the ego.
Acknowledge the monster under the bed and it becomes real.

0 new messages