murder in Eastenders.
thedarkman
it? The only person who could have done it was Jenkins - therefore he
did it.
You keep going on with this crap about the "real killer" being stained
with blood - refer to what I said about Mark Dixie.
You also assume that his daughters were turned against him. In fact if
you check closely you will see that Jenkins tried to verbal them up,
not the police.
The alternative scenario is that this character got into the house -
how did he know she was there alone? - battered her to death - then
left. Absolute drivel, and everyone with half a brain knows it - but
you appear not to have even half a brain.
That's probably why Jenkins made up that story about seeing the
mythical real killer in the house years later.
Keep peddling your ad hominem, abuse and repetition, but at the end of
the day there was only one suspect because the evidene against Jenkins
was absolutely overwhelming. Everything else is smoke and mirrors.
On 30 Dec, 10:30, Special Care <special.car...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 1:10 am, thedarkman <A_Ba...@ABaron.Demon.Co.UK> wrote:
>
> Like you, the police and the prosecution refused to deal with the two
> vital issues stated above, but peddled irrelevancies and went to work
> on his dimwitted, impressionable wife to browbeat her into believing
> the invisible, microscopic particles of blood on his jacket 'proved'
> he killed Billie-Jo, when in fact the absence of visible blood stains
> and brain tissue on his clothes, together with the fact that his other
> two daughters did not observe any change of clothes - proved him
> innocent.