Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Harry

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Bobby Bewl

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 4:37:53 PM12/10/09
to
..... your inbox is full and overflowing.

Bobby


Bobby Bewl

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 4:43:02 PM12/10/09
to

"Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:UZ6dnVyW-4Cx9rzW...@bt.com...

> ..... your inbox is full and overflowing.
>
> Bobby
>
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

harry_keane@


Harry Keane

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 4:54:13 PM12/11/09
to
"Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:UZ6dnVyW-4Cx9rzW...@bt.com...
> ..... your inbox is full and overflowing.

Thanks, I'm sorry about that, we've been in Malta for 2 weeks and I just
couldn't find the time/be bothered to check my mail every day. As a result,
and because of the staggering amount of spam mail I get, it soon filled up.
I did text No. 1 son to download some of my messages, but I still came home
to about 900 emails and a similar message to yours from Virgin Media! I
will try harder in future.
If I can allude to another of your posts, when I went on Facebook tonight
(first time in 15 days), I was amazed at how little I cared about most of
the stuff on there. Perhaps we all ought to get back to the newsgroups,
for adult and intellectual stimulation in the form of impassioned debate
over the issues of the day..... I'll do that tomorrow, maybe, right now
I'm going for a beer.
--
Harry Keane

Bobby Bewl

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 6:31:55 AM12/12/09
to

"Harry Keane" <Harry...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bczUm.3676$ra....@newsfe26.ams2...

> "Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
> news:UZ6dnVyW-4Cx9rzW...@bt.com...
>> ..... your inbox is full and overflowing.
>
> Thanks, I'm sorry about that, we've been in Malta for 2 weeks and I just
> couldn't find the time/be bothered to check my mail every day. As a
> result, and because of the staggering amount of spam mail I get, it soon
> filled up. I did text No. 1 son to download some of my messages, but I
> still came home to about 900 emails and a similar message to yours from
> Virgin Media! I will try harder in future.

I am surprised that your email addy provider does not filter out the spam
before forwarded your emails to your Outlook Express system. Or do you go
direct to web mail? I set u a message rule that sends emails from named
people to a folder of their own to avoid cluttering up the "Inbox".


> If I can allude to another of your posts, when I went on Facebook tonight
> (first time in 15 days), I was amazed at how little I cared about most of
> the stuff on there. Perhaps we all ought to get back to the newsgroups,
> for adult and intellectual stimulation in the form of impassioned debate
> over the issues of the day..... I'll do that tomorrow, maybe,

I am off of Facebook due to the inane nature of things there. I miss the
pics on my children's account. As for "adult and intellectual stimulation
in the form of impassioned debate over the issues of the day", that means
politics. Gawd! Facebook here I come! (not)

> right now I'm going for a beer.

I do not blame you.

Bobby


JackH

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 7:21:33 PM12/13/09
to
On Dec 12, 11:31 am, "Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote:

> I am off of Facebook due to the inane nature of things there.

I have said in here before, and I will say it again... Facebook is
what you make it, to a certain extent.

--
JackH

Harry Keane

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 12:09:17 PM12/14/09
to

>"JackH" <jackha...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:5cc7ee47-d99a-4c07-a583->ddc51e...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Just like real life, then....
--
Harry Keane


JackH

unread,
Dec 15, 2009, 1:31:25 PM12/15/09
to
On Dec 14, 5:09 pm, "Harry Keane" <Harry_Ke...@blueyonder.co.uk>
wrote:
> >"JackH" <jackhacket...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message

> >On Dec 12, 11:31 am, "Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote:

> >> I am off of Facebook due to the inane nature of things there.

> >I have said in here before, and I will say it again... Facebook is
> >what you make it, to a certain extent.

> Just like real life, then....

To a certain extent, yes. :-)

--
JackH

Bobby Bewl

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 4:30:22 PM12/18/09
to

"JackH" <jackha...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5cc7ee47-d99a-4c07...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 12, 11:31 am, "Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote:

> I am off of Facebook due to the inane nature of things there.

>> I have said in here before, and I will say it again...

Jack, I must take notice of what you say in future.

>> Facebook is
>> what you make it, to a certain extent.

Such is life, Jack.

With any "club" or social organisation you get as much out of it that you
put into it. Trouble with Facebook I post something that is of the level of
Facebook "friends" i.e. something that we would talk about face-to-face and
get no response. They (Facebook friends) want something lighter, trivial,
etc. I do not get the return for the input due to quality of Facebook
authors who communicate in words of one syllable or near text speak

ttfn

Bobby


Lewis Chimanga

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 5:19:52 PM12/18/09
to

"Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote in message

news:AZednc95q4HsabbW...@bt.com...

How can you compare Facebook with Usenet ? Like you do with Apples and
Oranges?

On Facebook you add friends etc and update them on what you are doing and
post pictures of your trip to South Africa. If your friends are bothered
enough they comment on these things and that's that.
On Usenet you post anonymously about topics you think is of interest to you.
Then other anonymous chat bots start replying and it spreads into a form of
threaded discussion/argument whatever. The beauty of this is that you do not
know the participants and you do not have to consider their emotions when
you hammer your point home using whatever disgusting language you want to
use.

Completely different forms of mediums and in no way comparable.

Usenet really has faced competition from online discussion forums. But the
difference being that these forums are set up and controlled by certain
individuals who seem to have power on what is said and discussed on the
forums. They also seem interested in collecting data on their users and
dictate terms. A bit like New Labour really.

JackH

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 7:33:59 PM12/18/09
to
On Dec 18, 9:30 pm, "Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote:
> "JackH" <jackhacket...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message

>
> news:5cc7ee47-d99a-4c07...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 12, 11:31 am, "Bobby Bewl" <a...@b.com> wrote:
>
> > I am off of Facebook due to the inane nature of things there.
> >>  I have said in here before, and I will say it again...
>
> Jack, I must take notice of what you say in future.

No, you can take it or leave it. ;-)

> >> Facebook is
> >> what you make it, to a certain extent.
>
> Such is life, Jack.
>
> With any "club" or social organisation you get as much out of it that you
> put into it.  Trouble with Facebook I post something that is of the level of
> Facebook "friends" i.e. something that we would talk about face-to-face and
> get no response.  They (Facebook friends) want something lighter, trivial,
> etc.  I do not get the return for the input due to quality of Facebook
> authors who communicate in words of one syllable or near text speak

Choose your 'friends' more wisely then, would be my suggestion. ;-)

--
JackH

Bobby Bewl

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 5:55:12 AM12/19/09
to

"JackH" <jackha...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:240095cc-7dbd-4e65...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

lol Good point. If I did that I would run out of "friends" ;-)

Bobby

0 new messages