Mike Crowe...........a liar!
Kenneth
criminal offences, and then posts their personal details all round the
net, possibly in the hope of some sort of vigilante action taking
place.
Crowes allegations though are completely spurious, as is the material
he has provided to "shriner" masons in the US to help create a silly
but rather amusing web page..................
Duke
Chris Stevens is a hypocrite and a liar
Charlie
Dead silence from one of the biggest liars on
usenet.................strange that Mike! Seems you must concur with
my thumbnail sketch outlining just a very small part of your appalling
behaviour................
Duke
You'd know all about appalling behaviour, rooking pensioners for your
unroadwirthy "repairs". Just as well you were sued and shut down.
Charlie
Before you attack others on here I would suggest you first make some
attempt to get your facts right, and also think of attending a
remedial class to help with your appalling spelling and grammer, both
of which at the moment seem to suggest you are a thick
cunt....................
Duke
"Grammar", Chris, not "grammer".
Foot in gob, yet again fat boy!
Richard
Been looking things up on the net have we? You must have struggled
with that as most of your posts seem to suggest you can barely read
and write!
Duke
It is of great amusement to watch you desperately trying to find
chinks in my armour. Pouncing on typos is the best you can do, to the
great amusement of all and sundry as every time you find a typo you
immediately make a gross error. We continue to laugh at you, fat boy,
not with you.
Richard
Armour?...................the fact that you appear to be a halfwit sub
epsilon, seems to suggest you do need very effective protection!
Duke
If you were only half witted, you'd still be ten times as intelligent
as you think you are.
In truth even half witted would be a major step up for you, as seen by
your "grammer".
Richard
Perhaps you dont know what a "sub epsilon" might be? How can this be I
wonder?
Duke
Did you get help looking it up, fat boy? And you missed the
apostrophe in "dont". "Grammer" (sic) really isn't your strong point.
Richard
LOL.................very very very dim just as I
thought...............LOL
Duke
You think? That's a surprise to all of us. I thought your "brain"
could only just handle motor functions.
Still working on the "grammer", are you? Thick twat.
Richard
I wonder why you continue to create these silly socks Mike? I have
defeated you time and time again, when you post using your real name,
so I suppose you might be thinking that a rather backward sock might
be a little more effective possibly?
Duke
Hahaha. You're a walking Sock Shop Chris. Is this like the way you
defeated Bunt? ie. in your own fat head?
Your "grammer" (Sic) shows us who is really backwards!
Tosser.
Richard
I have wiped the floor with bunt, as well as a group of very dodgy US
masons, and not forgetting a corrupt councillor who used public funds
to finance costly legal action, which he ended up
losing.......................what are your claims to fame I wonder
Mike?
Duke
Nope, those are lies. However, if I were going to make things up, I'd
at least try to make them impressive. Lame tosser.
Let's look at what you have acheived : you bodged cars and defrauded
people, were taken to court and put out of business, arrested and
thrown into chokey.