Message from discussion
Cycle Helmets : Bradley Wiggins Speaks Out
Received: by 10.216.241.9 with SMTP id f9mr94808wer.5.1344572289624;
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q11ni53845790wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feed-C.news.volia.net!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.12.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-2.ams.xsnews.nl!news.panservice.it!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:57:41 -0500
From: Judith <jmsmith2...@hotmail.co.uk>
Newsgroups: uk.legal,uk.rec.cycling
Subject: Re: Cycle Helmets : Bradley Wiggins Speaks Out
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:57:41 +0100
Message-ID: <l8io18963lmfls0m3p166s8c0pf31q06f9@4ax.com>
References: <a7urmtF5ivU2@mid.individual.net> <a7urvgF53jU4@mid.individual.net> <ltrl18hm485jfc8opcubt3bm879cinn3vr@4ax.com> <YODSr.375801$v24.62268@fx11.am4> <oueo185lns16jcl80hnadr36j8qn38dm35@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 12
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-YRg5m7lPmIKrWoIvfIOH7M420z63G76/cshYQG+8DGAbON9YZDlX1MBD/hRNaPYdp3jFI+ua6ROz8Pf!t+Z3kNLmTYEFlJ39asWceMgnL1RjY7Fu2p9o+oN7ViN3tw2w2tYxI7Nxevn1t6aOvaDiLg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1519
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:00:32 +0100, Alex Heney <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
<snip>
>>No there isn't. There is a solid body of scientific evidence supporting
>>their effectiveness.
>
>And an equally solid body of evidence showing otherwise.
Care to share it with us - say references to your best top 5.