"Alex Heney" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in messagenews:firstname.lastname@example.org...
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:15:33 -0000, "tim....."This is the point I am disputing. All that seems to have been said is is
> <tims_new_h...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>"GB" <NOTsome...@microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>>> I certainly hope he wins.
>>>>I don't see how he possibly can.
>>> Very easily.
>>>>No-one at the BBC claimed that he was the person they were referring to,
>>> There was sufficient information to make it clear.
>>I had absolutely no idea from the information reported afterwards (I
> Whether any specific individual knew ort not is irrelevant.
> If there was sufficient information to enable a number of people to
that it was someone from the Thatcher era.
How is that enough to identify any individual?
Just because someone might guess right doesn't make it enough.
> and at least some of those people would be likely toThat part is not in dispute
> think less of him as a result, that is enough for libel purposes.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.