Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Tom McTague - SFB Mirror Gutter Trash Epitomised
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Nigel Oldfield
Jan 29, 2012, 3:33:06 AM1/29/12
to
Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores of
previous convictions
by Tom McTague, Daily Mirror 27/01/2012
CycberCrimbe Unit attempt a sting operation in chat rooms
THEY are disturbing figures which will strike fear and revulsion into
the hearts of parents everywhere.
Child porn perverts, some with more than 20 previous convictions, are
being spared prison because of soft-touch sentencing guidelines for judges.
A Mirror investigation today exposes how potentially dangerous (sic)
paedophiles (sic) are repeatedly being freed (sic) back into the community.
One offender in 2010 was let off by a judge even though he had been
hauled before the courts on 29 previous occasions for having indecent
pictures of children.
The year before, another evaded a jail sentence for a child porn haul
even though he had been caught 22 times before on the same charge.
And in 2008, a culprit walked free despite being found guilty on 27
previous occasions.
The worrying revelations are contained in Ministry of Justice figures.
The Sentencing Council – which sets the punishments judges can give
criminals – has laid down rules stating that child porn offenders can
get away with community sentences even if they are caught with “a large
amount” of sickening photos and other material.
There are five categories of abuse for child porn images, with one the
least serious ..."
Read more:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpkZKNPx
*****
tom.m...@sundaymirror.co.uk
Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
of previous convictions
Dear Tom,
Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
of previous convictions
Read more:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpiWiAmi
"A Ministry of Justice spokesman revealed the Government would conduct a
review of paedophile sentencing ..."
No they did not, you ignorant, sensationalist, fool, as no such thing
exists.
There is little value in me correcting you, on the remaining ranting
garbage in your 'piece', if you cannot even get that correct.
Grow up, learn about the issues and damage you are doing, and get a
proper job.
Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield
Critical Estoppel
*****
Look forward to you visiting here, Tom.
WM
previous convictions
by Tom McTague, Daily Mirror 27/01/2012
CycberCrimbe Unit attempt a sting operation in chat rooms
THEY are disturbing figures which will strike fear and revulsion into
the hearts of parents everywhere.
Child porn perverts, some with more than 20 previous convictions, are
being spared prison because of soft-touch sentencing guidelines for judges.
A Mirror investigation today exposes how potentially dangerous (sic)
paedophiles (sic) are repeatedly being freed (sic) back into the community.
One offender in 2010 was let off by a judge even though he had been
hauled before the courts on 29 previous occasions for having indecent
pictures of children.
The year before, another evaded a jail sentence for a child porn haul
even though he had been caught 22 times before on the same charge.
And in 2008, a culprit walked free despite being found guilty on 27
previous occasions.
The worrying revelations are contained in Ministry of Justice figures.
The Sentencing Council – which sets the punishments judges can give
criminals – has laid down rules stating that child porn offenders can
get away with community sentences even if they are caught with “a large
amount” of sickening photos and other material.
There are five categories of abuse for child porn images, with one the
least serious ..."
Read more:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpkZKNPx
*****
tom.m...@sundaymirror.co.uk
Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
of previous convictions
Dear Tom,
Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
of previous convictions
Read more:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpiWiAmi
"A Ministry of Justice spokesman revealed the Government would conduct a
review of paedophile sentencing ..."
No they did not, you ignorant, sensationalist, fool, as no such thing
exists.
There is little value in me correcting you, on the remaining ranting
garbage in your 'piece', if you cannot even get that correct.
Grow up, learn about the issues and damage you are doing, and get a
proper job.
Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield
Critical Estoppel
*****
Look forward to you visiting here, Tom.
WM
Dissenter
Jan 29, 2012, 5:03:24 AM1/29/12
to
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:33:06 +0000, Nigel Oldfield
<WMCritica...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores of
>previous convictions
>
>by Tom McTague, Daily Mirror 27/01/2012
>
>CycberCrimbe Unit attempt a sting operation in chat rooms
>
>THEY are disturbing figures which will strike fear and revulsion into
>the hearts of parents everywhere.
[...]
<WMCritica...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores of
>previous convictions
>
>by Tom McTague, Daily Mirror 27/01/2012
>
>CycberCrimbe Unit attempt a sting operation in chat rooms
>
>THEY are disturbing figures which will strike fear and revulsion into
>the hearts of parents everywhere.
>Read more:
>http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpkZKNPx
>
>*****
>
>tom.m...@sundaymirror.co.uk
>Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
>of previous convictions
>
>Dear Tom,
>
>Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
>of previous convictions
>Read more:
>http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpiWiAmi
>
>"A Ministry of Justice spokesman revealed the Government would conduct a
>review of paedophile sentencing ..."
>
>No they did not, you ignorant, sensationalist, fool, as no such thing
>exists.
>
>There is little value in me correcting you, on the remaining ranting
>garbage in your 'piece', if you cannot even get that correct.
>
>Grow up, learn about the issues and damage you are doing, and get a
>proper job.
>
>Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield
>Critical Estoppel
>
>*****
>
>Look forward to you visiting here, Tom.
Not clear what you're trying to do here, Mr Oldfield. Clearly Mr
>http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpkZKNPx
>
>*****
>
>tom.m...@sundaymirror.co.uk
>Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
>of previous convictions
>
>Dear Tom,
>
>Re: Mirror investigation: Child porn culprits spared jail despite scores
>of previous convictions
>Read more:
>http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/27/mirror-investigation-child-porn-culprits-spared-jail-despite-scores-of-previous-convictions-115875-23722056/#ixzz1kpiWiAmi
>
>"A Ministry of Justice spokesman revealed the Government would conduct a
>review of paedophile sentencing ..."
>
>No they did not, you ignorant, sensationalist, fool, as no such thing
>exists.
>
>There is little value in me correcting you, on the remaining ranting
>garbage in your 'piece', if you cannot even get that correct.
>
>Grow up, learn about the issues and damage you are doing, and get a
>proper job.
>
>Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield
>Critical Estoppel
>
>*****
>
>Look forward to you visiting here, Tom.
McTague will ignore your missive, if he sees it at all. I suppose
writing it may make you feel better for a while.
--
Dissenter
Nigel Oldfield
Jan 29, 2012, 5:05:30 AM1/29/12
to
>> Look forward to you visiting here, Tom.
>
> Not clear what you're trying to do here, Mr Oldfield.
Dr, please ... or Fat Nige.
>
> Not clear what you're trying to do here, Mr Oldfield.
>Clearly Mr
> McTague will ignore your missive, if he sees it at all.
>I suppose
> writing it may make you feel better for a while.
WM
0 new messages