Casson 2 accidental deaths Pinochet head of regime reponsible for deaths of thousands AND gross human rights violations! Casson straight to prison. Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court. Justice Bunkum!
In article <7tgav1$ok...@lure.pipex.net>, Philip Walton <xd...@dial.pipex.com> writes
>Casson 2 accidental deaths >Pinochet head of regime reponsible for deaths of thousands AND gross human >rights violations! >Casson straight to prison. >Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court. >Justice Bunkum!
He's had a stroke, the doctors even thought he was dying at one point and called a priest.
He'll be answering to a much higher authority before long. -- Richard Miller
oh goody, all I need do is...... a. rob a bank. b. pay some pet quack to say I am having a heart attack and may be dying. c. retire to some sunny beach to enjoy my ill-gotten gains. super.
> In article <7tgav1$ok...@lure.pipex.net>, Philip Walton > <xd...@dial.pipex.com> writes > >Casson 2 accidental deaths > >Pinochet head of regime reponsible for deaths of thousands AND gross human > >rights violations! > >Casson straight to prison. > >Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court. > >Justice Bunkum!
> He's had a stroke, the doctors even thought he was dying at one point > and called a priest.
> He'll be answering to a much higher authority before long. > -- > Richard Miller
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:44:55 +0100, "Philip Walton"
<xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote: >Casson 2 accidental deaths >Pinochet head of regime reponsible for deaths of thousands AND gross human >rights violations! >Casson straight to prison. >Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court.
Steady on, Philip. Pinochet hasn't been convicted of anything yet! --
> On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:44:55 +0100, "Philip Walton" > <xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> >Casson 2 accidental deaths > >Pinochet head of regime reponsible for deaths of thousands AND gross human > >rights violations! > >Casson straight to prison. > >Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court.
> Steady on, Philip. Pinochet hasn't been convicted of anything yet! > --
> Paul Burridge <P...@osiris1.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message > news:37fc79ce.7255516@news.freeserve.co.uk... > > On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:44:55 +0100, "Philip Walton" > > <xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> > >Casson 2 accidental deaths > > >Pinochet head of regime responsible for deaths of thousands AND gross > human > > >rights violations! > > >Casson straight to prison. > > >Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court.
> > Steady on, Philip. Pinochet hasn't been convicted of anything yet! > and he's not likely to be as long as he is allowed to avoid going to trial > is he.
This is not a trial - it's a preliminary application
-- Ruth Hine " What about Magna Carta? Did she die in vain?" Galton and Simpson's "Twelve Angry Men"
In article <rvp927thd6...@corp.supernews.com>, A. McCardle. <alm@corrupt ion.madasafish.com> writes
>and he's not likely to be as long as he is allowed to avoid going to trial >is he.
and he's not avoiding it, because he's not on trial. Nor will he be unless the extradition application succeeds. That's the whole point of the extradition. -- Andrew Nichols NB spamtrap replace nospam by solicit
Paul Burridge wrote in message <37fc79ce.7255...@news.freeserve.co.uk>... >On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:44:55 +0100, "Philip Walton" ><xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>>Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court.
>Steady on, Philip. Pinochet hasn't been convicted of anything yet!
Now don't be a spoilsport. Philip only wants something he can kill and then stamp on whilst reasoning that his frisson is virtuous and pure.
In article <HgxmBYAWMO$3E...@seasalter0.demon.co.uk>, Richard Miller <rich_and_ca...@seasalter0.NOSPAM.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <37fc7b71.7674...@news.freeserve.co.uk>, Paul Burridge ><P...@osiris1.freeserve.co.uk> writes >>On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 22:45:23 +0100, Richard Miller >><rich_and_ca...@seasalter0.NOSPAM.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>He'll be answering to a much higher authority before long.
>>One hopes the process 'up there' is somewhat speedier.
>Well, I suppose God may have to apply to Satan for extradition....
He wouldn't stand a chance. The devil has all the best lawyers :-) -- Marshall Rice
Paul Burridge wrote in message <37fc79ce.7255...@news.freeserve.co.uk>... >On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:44:55 +0100, "Philip Walton" ><xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>>Casson 2 accidental deaths >>Pinochet head of regime reponsible for deaths of thousands AND gross human >>rights violations! >>Casson straight to prison. >>Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court.
>Steady on, Philip. Pinochet hasn't been convicted of anything yet! >--
>Noverint universi per presentes et futuri...
Agreed...And the betting is he won't be either. I would like him to have to attend at common magistrates court though rather than being allowed to avoid it. BTW I enjoyed yours and Richards celestial legal arguments, very amusing. Will you be a prosecution or defence lawyer in the afterlife?
Preliminary hearing, trial, pleading diet or whatever no one should be able to avoid investigation on the basis of a possible risk to their health, after all if that sort of excuse had been put forward to attempt to prevent someone like hyndley or west from being taken to trial or preliminary hearing do you think it would have worked for them, I don't think so, And if its only a preliminary hearing to determine whether or not there are sufficient grounds for taking him to trial there is not any real need for him to attend in person as he will no doubt have all the most prominent legal firms fighting to defend him so he would be well represented.
> > Paul Burridge <P...@osiris1.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message > > news:37fc79ce.7255516@news.freeserve.co.uk... > > > On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:44:55 +0100, "Philip Walton" > > > <xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> > > >Casson 2 accidental deaths > > > >Pinochet head of regime responsible for deaths of thousands AND gross > > human > > > >rights violations! > > > >Casson straight to prison. > > > >Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court.
> > > Steady on, Philip. Pinochet hasn't been convicted of anything yet!
> > and he's not likely to be as long as he is allowed to avoid going to trial > > is he.
> This is not a trial - it's a preliminary application
> -- > Ruth Hine > " What about Magna Carta? Did she die in vain?" > Galton and Simpson's "Twelve Angry Men"
A. McCardle. wrote in message ... >Preliminary hearing, trial, pleading diet or whatever no one should be able >to avoid investigation on the basis of a possible risk to their health,
Richard Miller wrote in message ... >In article <37fc7b71.7674...@news.freeserve.co.uk>, Paul Burridge ><P...@osiris1.freeserve.co.uk> writes >>On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 22:45:23 +0100, Richard Miller >><rich_and_ca...@seasalter0.NOSPAM.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>He'll be answering to a much higher authority before long.
>>One hopes the process 'up there' is somewhat speedier.
>Well, I suppose God may have to apply to Satan for extradition.... >-- >Richard Miller
Richard Miller wrote in message ... >In article <37fc7b71.7674...@news.freeserve.co.uk>, Paul Burridge ><P...@osiris1.freeserve.co.uk> writes >>On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 22:45:23 +0100, Richard Miller >><rich_and_ca...@seasalter0.NOSPAM.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>He'll be answering to a much higher authority before long.
>>One hopes the process 'up there' is somewhat speedier.
>Well, I suppose God may have to apply to Satan for extradition....
It's warming you know that you believe in the power of repentance and redemption.
Puts me in mide of a joke, the punchline of which is a comment from St Peter that Rudy Valentino driving aroung Heaven in a BMW coupe had just knocked a Pope off his roller skates.
Marshall Rice wrote in message ... >In article <HgxmBYAWMO$3E...@seasalter0.demon.co.uk>, Richard Miller ><rich_and_ca...@seasalter0.NOSPAM.demon.co.uk> writes
>>Well, I suppose God may have to apply to Satan for extradition....
>He wouldn't stand a chance. The devil has all the best lawyers :-)
In article <7tk866$dg...@lure.pipex.net>, Philip Walton <xd...@dial.pipex.com> writes
>Agreed...And the betting is he won't be either. I would like him to have to >attend at common magistrates court though rather than being allowed to >avoid it. BTW I enjoyed yours and Richards celestial legal arguments, very >amusing. Will you be a prosecution or defence lawyer in the afterlife?
I'd always fight for the underdog.:-) -- Richard Miller
Richard Miller wrote in message ... >In article <7tk866$dg...@lure.pipex.net>, Philip Walton ><xd...@dial.pipex.com> writes >>Agreed...And the betting is he won't be either. I would like him to have to >>attend at common magistrates court though rather than being allowed to >>avoid it. BTW I enjoyed yours and Richards celestial legal arguments, very >>amusing. Will you be a prosecution or defence lawyer in the afterlife?
>I'd always fight for the underdog.:-)
That is a good lawyer's answer, maybe a short stay in purgatory would make you give answers which are easier to comment on. I have had only a few dealings with lawyers, and have never had an answer that is anything like black and white, usually ensuring that I have a headache in deciding the answer to my question myself anyway. Having said this, if the Almighty is not sure which way I am going, you are hired....Philip,
>Paul Burridge wrote in message <37fc79ce.7255...@news.freeserve.co.uk>... >>On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:44:55 +0100, "Philip Walton" >><xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>>>Pincochet doesn't even have to go to court.
>>Steady on, Philip. Pinochet hasn't been convicted of anything yet!
>Now don't be a spoilsport. Philip only wants something he can kill and then >stamp on whilst reasoning that his frisson is virtuous and pure.
Seeing him humiliated will do Owen... Old men should be treated equally in the eyes of the law. Nobody will convict Pinochet of anything, so I would like to see a little judicial hay made during his stay in this country. I cannot believe that he had no way of stopping some of the worse atrocities that occured during his dictatorship, and that he had no inkling that they were occuring. If I am proved wrong however (whilst reasoning that my frisson....) little harm will have come by a visit to a magistrates court, I am not asking for the man to be hung, which during my periods of hyperexcitability and lack of rationality, I think is too good for him. Philip
investigation for alleged crimes?, by claiming he is too unfit to withstand the rigours of an investigation.
I, and, I suspect, a lot of others would disagree.
a lot of prisoners in various jails suffer from heart problems, tumours and other serious health issues , yet the courts didn't say it was all right for them to avoid being tried till they were well and fit.
-- andy
Fergus O'Rourke <site...@tinet.ie> wrote in message
> A. McCardle. wrote in message ... > >Preliminary hearing, trial, pleading diet or whatever no one should be able > >to avoid investigation on the basis of a possible risk to their health,
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999 06:22:01 +0100, "Philip Walton"
<xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote: >Agreed...And the betting is he won't be either. I would like him to have to >attend at common magistrates court though rather than being allowed to >avoid it. BTW I enjoyed yours and Richards celestial legal arguments, very >amusing. Will you be a prosecution or defence lawyer in the afterlife?
Osiris, ideally: the Judge of the Dead. Can't see it happening, though. I know my limits. :-) --
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999 20:57:39 +0100, "Philip Walton"
<xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote: > I >am not asking for the man to be hung, which during my periods of >hyperexcitability and lack of rationality, I think is too good for him.
I think your views are understandable. However, I don't really see why a) the Spanish are seeking to try him or b) he is fighting the extradition
because under Spanish law he cannot be imprisoned due to his age, anyway. :-/ --
A. McCardle. wrote in message ... >Isn't what?, >avoiding trial/prosecution
>investigation for alleged crimes?, >by claiming he is too unfit to withstand the rigours of an investigation.
>I, and, I suspect, a lot of others would disagree.
>a lot of prisoners in various jails suffer from heart problems, tumours and >other serious health issues , yet the courts didn't say it was all right for >them to avoid being tried till they were well and fit.
>-- >andy
>Fergus O'Rourke <site...@tinet.ie> wrote in message >news:7tkp4p$pea$2@scotty.tinet.ie... >> A. McCardle. wrote in message ... >> >Preliminary hearing, trial, pleading diet or whatever no one should be >able >> >to avoid investigation on the basis of a possible risk to their health,
>> He isn't
...avoiding any of those things, as you probably realise by now. All he was doing was staying away for the day
|
