Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Religious aggrevated public order offences
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Zapp Brannigan  
View profile  
 More options Aug 20 2012, 4:50 pm
Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated
From: "Zapp Brannigan" <ZBr...@DOOP.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:50:03 +0100
Local: Mon, Aug 20 2012 4:50 pm
Subject: Re: Religious aggrevated public order offences

"Mark Goodge" <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote in message

news:njv4389bjdf3lrpde40oc1m3qigjnr56hp@news.markshouse.net...

> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:30:04 +0100, Jon Ribbens put finger to keyboard and
> typed:

>>On 2012-08-19, Mark Goodge <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:56:11 +0100, jj221...@gmail.com put finger to
>>> keyboard and typed:
>>>>British officials seem to be queuing up to criticise the Russian
>>>>courts. Yet within the past year English courts have been handing
>>>>out much longer sentences for public order offences.

>>>>I wonder what the reaction would be in the UK if a group of masked
>>>>yobs broke into St. Paul's and terrorised the clergy? Assuming, of
>>>>course, that SCO19 didn't shoot them first.

>>> If prosecuted and convicted, they'd probably be fined around £1000. Or
>>> possibly imprisoned for a few months if the actions were considered
>>> particularly serious.

>>Peter Tatchell did something quite similar and was sentenced to a fine
>>of £18.60 plus costs.

> Was there any particular reason for that specific sum of money? Seems a
> little odd not to make it a round twenty.

The Act he was sentenced under was the "Pissing About in Ye Churches Act
1860" or something, and it was rumoured that the Judge thought 1860 had a
nice resonance.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.