Newsgroups: uk.environment
From: Marc Brett <m...@fordson.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 14:40:16 +0000
Local: Fri, Dec 1 2006 9:40 am
Subject: Re: Power Save Corp or KVAR Unit? Who will win the fight to reduce your electric bill?
On 30 Nov 2006 18:52:51 -0800, "poun...@energyboxx.com" <poun...@energyboxx.com>
wrote: >Power Save Corp has a product that is claiming that it is based on To quote another poster: >patent # 5,440,442 and that their product the Power Save 1200 has been >tested by Nasa. The facts are this, the KVAR Unit is not only based on >patent #5,440,442 (which by the way is patented by Gregory Taylor) who >also owns KVAR Energy Savings Inc and the KVAR Unit.The KVAR Unit is 1. As SQLit said major effect of increasing the power factor is only of 2. Propaganda on reducing residential killo-Watt-hours (power) by about 3. With a low power factor there would be some reduction in current and 4. From what I saw in the patent application, conviently supplied by bud-- Looks kike more snake oil. If you want lower bills, you need to do it the hard You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||