Global Temperature Updates - October 2009
Falcon
October 2009 UAH Global Temperature Update +0.28 deg. C
AMSR-E show SSTs cooling. http://tinyurl.com/ykzddwj
--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)
Falcon
Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
> "Falcon" <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
>>
>> October 2009 UAH Global Temperature Update +0.28 deg. C
>> AMSR-E show SSTs cooling. http://tinyurl.com/ykzddwj
>
> RSS AMSU LT shows approx. the same.
>
> Also, USA shows a very drastic cooling... -1,597 �C!
Not all trends have taken a downward turn.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
kdt...@earthlink.net
> Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
> > "Falcon" <fal...@invalid.net> wrote:
>
> >> October 2009 UAH Global Temperature Update +0.28 deg. C
>
> > RSS AMSU LT shows approx. the same.
>
> > Also, USA shows a very drastic cooling... -1,597 °C!
>
>
> --
> Falcon:
> fide, sed cui vide. (L)
That's right, keep up the hopes that maybe this will be the year that
exceeds 98. Otherwise the FLAT trend continues, which is also not
compatible in any means at all with theoretical CO2 warming.
Greenie weenies should pray to their god, algore, that this year they
will be able to fudge the figures or something so they can claim the
warming trend that they desparately need to fulfill their feeling of
importance and neccesity to modern society.
Maybe Hansen will figure out a way to alter the statistics with some
more corrections to portray a warming trend in between his time he
spends as political activist and terrorist to our energy
infrastructure in organizing demonstrations and disruption of
particular energy supplies with his propaganizing of uneducated
activists.
Just what the public pays for with his salary.
KD
Falcon
enigma wrote:
> Is your claim in sync with a photographic record that shows glacial
> retreat and ice shelves breaking up?
I haven't claimed anything. The analysis is from professional climate
scientists, at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). Temperature
trends from radiosondes closely match the v5.2 UAH dataset. [Christy
et.al.(2007) http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2005JD006881.shtml ]
Falcon
Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
> Peter Muehlbauer <spamt...@AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
>> CO2 trend is out of discussion for me, as it might be a delayed
>> reaction from the MVP.
>
> * MWP
Thanks. I was wondering what MVP was. ;-)
>> But assuming, there might be a hypothetical link between T and CO2
>> as AGWs always claim, this is evidence that MVP climate was warmer
>> than today.
>> In this case, inclining CO2 while T does not follow, it entirely
>> disproves their own theory :-)
>>
>> As CO2 has almost no or not enough influence on climate, but has a
>> positive effect on plants and life, I hope it will increase further.
>> If only to prove AGW a lie.
I M @ good guy
<spamt...@AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
>CO2 trend is out of discussion for me, as it might be a delayed
>reaction from the MVP.
What is MVP, Most Valuable Player?
Or Medieval Varm Period in German? :-)
>But assuming, there might be a hypothetical link between T and CO2
>as AGWs always claim, this is evidence that MVP climate was warmer
>than today.
>In this case, inclining CO2 while T does not follow, it entirely disproves
>their own theory :-)
>
>As CO2 has almost no or not enough influence on climate, but has a positive
>effect on plants and life, I hope it will increase further.
>If only to prove AGW a lie.
Today was warm, too bad it won't continue.