Tim Streater wrote:
> In article <nKNmr.4610$JQ....@fx02.am4>,
> Lobster <
davidlobs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 27/04/2012 21:50, Owain wrote:
>> > On Apr 27, 7:14 pm, Ian Jackson
>> > <
ianREMOVETHISjack...@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> In message<jnegbs$
o5...@dont-email.me>, ARWadsworth
>> >> <
adamwadswo...@blueyonder.co.uk> writes>I suspect they will be fun.
>> >>
>> >>> They also have a pregnant Staffie that was accidently knobbed by
>> both a
>> >>> labrador and a spaniel so they do not what to expect puppywise.
>> >>
>> >> 1/3 Staffie 2/3 Spanador?
>> >
>> > Wouldn't the offspring be stafadors and staniels?
>> >
>> > A spanador would suggest some interesting lesbian doggy action. [1]
>>
>> Well FYI I met a jackapoo at puppy training class this week.
>>
>>
>>
>> The puppy trainer was telling us about another punter of his who was
>> proudly showing off his new "Pedigree Labradoodle".
>>
>> "Er - it's not a pedigree I'm afraid; no such thing; it's just a
>> cross-breed or a mongrel"
>
> All dogs are either in-bred or mongrels. I know which I'd rather have
> (well, neither actually but that's beside the point).
>
Well No that's not totally true. Especially in popular breeds like
Labradors, because there are so many of them.
The odd thing is our pure bred labrador has on more than one occasion
given rise to a litter of puppies, but only with other black labradors.
He has never to my knowledge shagged any other breed.
And that's all of his own volition.
The terrier seems less sure..
I suspect dogs, like cats do not suffer so much from inbreeding anyway.
--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.