Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 47 of 47 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Dave  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Dave <d...@cableol.co.uk>
Date: 1998/01/25
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

I heard that condensed flue vapours can be pretty corrosive which could
lead to serious long term damage in boilers which don't have a drain for
them.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Idiotic advice" by Ian Smith
Ian Smith  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Ian Smith <ian.sm...@zetnet.co.uk>
Date: 1998/01/25
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

The message <38221962...@paley.demon.co.yuk>
  from  Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk> contains these words:

> But I NEVER said do a bodge job ! The boiler needs a supply of fresh air
> and the exhaust taking away. Boiler manufacturers are doing it already by
> putting fans in the flues. A gas tight flue is essential and so is a fan
> failure detector.

Fair enough.  Not worth arguing about.  However I would personally never
attempt to do myself what boiler manufacturers themselves are hopefully
rather good at.  I'm sure that you, Mike, like Matthew would not want to
encourage anyone to get into things that they're not competent to attempt.
And the consequences of filling your house with CO don't bear thinking about.

Ian.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
nick nelson  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: n.w.nel...@education.leeds.ac.uk (nick nelson)
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

Mike Paley wrote:

> But I NEVER said do a bodge job ! The boiler needs a supply of fresh air
> and the exhaust taking away. Boiler manufacturers are doing it already by
> putting fans in the flues. A gas tight flue is essential and so is a fan
> failure detector.

Of course, but I think the point was that:

 "fit the boiler with it's normal flue but duct it into a pipe with
  a  fan in it or something"

was rather vague and off-hand, and just might tempt someone who
really had no idea of the dangers, to do something silly.

Take this as an explanation of MM's response rather than
a criticism, I'm always making vague and off-hand remarks
here.

Nick.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rex Bradley  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Rex Bradley <b...@brad.demon.co.uk>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

In article <1998012520452070...@zetnet.co.uk>, Ian Smith
<ian.sm...@zetnet.co.uk> writes

>The message <38221962...@paley.demon.co.yuk>
>  from  Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk> contains these words:

>> But I NEVER said do a bodge job !
snip
> I'm sure that you, Mike, like Matthew would not want to
>encourage anyone to get into things that they're not competent to attempt.
>And the consequences of filling your house with CO don't bear thinking about.

>Ian.
>Here here, one funeral of a young student who died this way is enough

for me.

Stay safe.

--
Arby


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable" by Andy Wade
Andy Wade  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Followup-To: uk.d-i-y
From: "Andy Wade" <AJW...@dial.pipex.com>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

Dave wrote in article ...

> I heard that condensed flue vapours can be pretty corrosive which could
> lead to serious long term damage in boilers which don't have a drain for
> them.

Yes indeed, that's another good reason why you don't want condensation in a
conventional boiler.  It's also why all condensing boilers have aluminium
heat exchangers - copper is out because of the problem of it being leached
into the drainage system.  The only other suitable material, apparently, is
316 stainless steel, which is too expensive at least for domestic boilers.

Actually, according to the CIBSE manual I referred to in a previous post
the condensate is "only mildly acidic" with a pH in the range 3 - 4.5,
typically 3.5, but of course time and temperature will take their toll even
with that "mild" degree of corrosiveness.

--
Andy


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alan Briggs  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Alan Briggs <Alan.Briggs.2818...@nortel.co.uk>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

Andy Wade wrote:

............
> Yes indeed, that's another good reason why you don't want condensation in a
> conventional boiler.  It's also why all condensing boilers have aluminium
> heat exchangers - copper is out because of the problem of it being leached
> into the drainage system.  The only other suitable material, apparently, is
> 316 stainless steel, which is too expensive at least for domestic boilers.

...........

Looking at what is currently available on the market I actually find
that many manufacturers do use stainless steel heat exchangers.  These
boilers certainly have outputs suitable for domestic use.  I have not
yet done a price comparison.  

--

- Alan Briggs -


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andy Wade  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: "Andy Wade" <AJW...@dial.pipex.com>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

Alan Briggs wrote ...

> Looking at what is currently available on the market I actually find
> that many manufacturers do use stainless steel heat exchangers.  These
> boilers certainly have outputs suitable for domestic use.  I have not
> yet done a price comparison.  

I stand corrected.  Can you name some names?

--
Andy


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Idiotic advice" by Andrew Gabriel
Andrew Gabriel  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: and...@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel)
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

In article <38221962...@paley.demon.co.yuk>,
        Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk> writes:

>In article: <1998012419263270...@zetnet.co.uk>  Ian Smith
><ian.sm...@zetnet.co.uk> writes:
>:) Heath-Robinson bodges with gas boilers don't seem too clever to me,
>either.
>:) Matthew was probably rather keen to impress on anyone who doesn't know
>better
>:) that DIY in relation to boiler flues is potentially a
>:) life-threatening passtime.
>:)

>But I NEVER said do a bodge job ! The boiler needs a supply of fresh air
>and the exhaust taking away. Boiler manufacturers are doing it already by
>putting fans in the flues. A gas tight flue is essential and so is a fan
>failure detector.

I believe you would have to get the appliance Gas Council approved
again following any such change. That would probably cost you many
times the cost of a replacement appliance designed to cope with
the containt you are attempting to work around.

--
Andrew Gabriel
Consultant Software Engineer


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Siting a New (Gas) Boiler" by Stephen Dawson
Stephen Dawson  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: "Stephen Dawson" <steve_daw...@mcmail.com>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Siting a New (Gas) Boiler

Likewise, what happens when the flue sucks the flame thru said duct and
catches light, ( well it might if he bodges the duct out of mdf )

SPAMPROOFED*

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Idiotic advice" by Mike Paley
Mike Paley  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

In article: <1998012520452070...@zetnet.co.uk>  Ian Smith

<ian.sm...@zetnet.co.uk> writes:

:) > But I NEVER said do a bodge job ! The boiler needs a supply of fresh
air
:) > and the exhaust taking away. Boiler manufacturers are doing it already
by
:) > putting fans in the flues. A gas tight flue is essential and so is a
fan
:) > failure detector.
:)
:) Fair enough.  Not worth arguing about.  However I would personally never
:) attempt to do myself what boiler manufacturers themselves are hopefully
:) rather good at.  I'm sure that you, Mike, like Matthew would not want to
:) encourage anyone to get into things that they're not competent to
attempt.
:) And the consequences of filling your house with CO don't bear thinking
about.
:)

It's a case of being competent enough to know your own competence level for
a particular task.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure of my competence to take the car back to the
garage and competently complain that they've done a bodge job of fitting my
exhaust. Both new joints leak, one badly and at least the tail pipe has
mountings missing !

--
Comm again, Mike.

My friend used to go to parties on the moon. He stopped going, so I asked
him why and he replied. "They've got no atmosphere."

Ex Windows 95 user                   Ex Turnpike user.

More info.: http://www.paley.demon.co.uk/ [1998:01:10]


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable" by Mike Paley
Mike Paley  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

In article: <01bd2a55$85ce04a0$LocalHost@8721hvt85436>  "Andy Wade"

<AJW...@dial.pipex.com> writes:

:) Yes indeed, that's another good reason why you don't want condensation
in a
:) conventional boiler.  It's also why all condensing boilers have
aluminium
:) heat exchangers - copper is out because of the problem of it being
leached
:) into the drainage system.  The only other suitable material, apparently,
is
:) 316 stainless steel, which is too expensive at least for domestic
boilers.
:)

I'd have though allyminium would be worse as it's more reactive. But it's
chemistry - and that's where I shut up !

--
Comm again, Mike.

My friend used to go to parties on the moon. He stopped going, so I asked
him why and he replied. "They've got no atmosphere."

Ex Windows 95 user                   Ex Turnpike user.

More info.: http://www.paley.demon.co.uk/ [1998:01:10]


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Idiotic advice" by Mike Paley
Mike Paley  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

In article: <34CCB8A1.5...@education.leeds.ac.uk>  

n.w.nel...@education.leeds.ac.uk (nick nelson) writes:
:) Mike Paley wrote:

:)
:) >
:) > But I NEVER said do a bodge job ! The boiler needs a supply of fresh
air
:) > and the exhaust taking away. Boiler manufacturers are doing it already
by
:) > putting fans in the flues. A gas tight flue is essential and so is a
fan
:) > failure detector.
:) >
:)
:) Of course, but I think the point was that:
:)
:)  "fit the boiler with it's normal flue but duct it into a pipe with
:)   a  fan in it or something"
:)
:) was rather vague and off-hand, and just might tempt someone who
:) really had no idea of the dangers, to do something silly.
:)
:) Take this as an explanation of MM's response rather than
:) a criticism, I'm always making vague and off-hand remarks
:) here.
:)

Come on be truthful !!! I'm an incompetent Usenet user ! - for not taking
into account WHO may take the "advice" and....

--
Comm again, Mike.

My friend used to go to parties on the moon. He stopped going, so I asked
him why and he replied. "They've got no atmosphere."

Ex Windows 95 user                   Ex Turnpike user.

More info.: http://www.paley.demon.co.uk/ [1998:01:10]


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike Paley  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk>
Date: 1998/01/26
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

In article: <TpI7qTA+$Gz0E...@brad.demon.co.uk>  Rex Bradley

<b...@brad.demon.co.uk> writes:

:) > I'm sure that you, Mike, like Matthew would not want to
:) >encourage anyone to get into things that they're not competent to
attempt.
:) >And the consequences of filling your house with CO don't bear thinking
about.
:) >
:) >Ian.
:) >Here here, one funeral of a young student who died this way is enough
:) for me.
:)
:) Stay safe.
:)

I went to a new friend's house a while back. It wasn't long before I got a
"sleepsafe" CO detector. Ok, CO is smellless(!) but there was a "paraffiny"
smell - from a gas cooker !

--
Comm again, Mike.

My friend used to go to parties on the moon. He stopped going, so I asked
him why and he replied. "They've got no atmosphere."

Ex Windows 95 user                   Ex Turnpike user.

More info.: http://www.paley.demon.co.uk/ [1998:01:10]


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable" by Alan Briggs
Alan Briggs  
View profile  
 More options Jan 27 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Alan Briggs <Alan.Briggs.2818...@nortel.co.uk>
Date: 1998/01/27
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

Andy Wade wrote:

> Alan Briggs wrote ...

> > Looking at what is currently available on the market I actually find
> > that many manufacturers do use stainless steel heat exchangers.  These
> > boilers certainly have outputs suitable for domestic use.  I have not
> > yet done a price comparison.

> I stand corrected.  Can you name some names?

> --
> Andy

Viessman, Yorkstar (I'm told), Atlantic 2000, Eco

Broag,

Ferroli use copper (primary) and aluminium secondary
--

- Alan Briggs -


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alan Briggs  
View profile  
 More options Jan 27 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Alan Briggs <Alan.Briggs.2818...@nortel.co.uk>
Date: 1998/01/27
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

Sorry about the previous posting.  A software glitch caused the message
to be sent before I had finished composing it!

Andy Wade wrote:

> Alan Briggs wrote ...

> > Looking at what is currently available on the market I actually find
> > that many manufacturers do use stainless steel heat exchangers.  These
> > boilers certainly have outputs suitable for domestic use.  I have not
> > yet done a price comparison.

> I stand corrected.  Can you name some names?

> --
> Andy

At present the Energy Saving Trust (government sponsored organisation)
is offering a £200 cashback on condensing boilers from a list of
approved suppliers.  From the suppliers on this list:

Atlantic 2000, Eco Hometec, Vaillant and Viessman use stainless steel
heat exchangers.  Yorkpark told me they do and I think Keston do also.

Broag and Potterton use Aluminium.

Ferroli use copper (primary) and aluminium (secondary).  Vokera use
"cast alloy".

There are a number of other manufacturers but I don't have their details
to hand.  The recommended retail proce of the Potterton boiler is not
significantly lower than that of at least some of those with stainless
steel heat exchangers.

--

- Alan Briggs -


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Idiotic advice" by strangl...@geocities.com_(
stranglerz  
View profile  
 More options Jan 27 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: strangl...@geocities.com (())
Date: 1998/01/27
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

On Fri, 23 Jan 1998 21:42:44 , Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk>
wrote:

Well of course you can fan a conventional flue. It is a common place
arrangement in large commercial and industrial setups where single
large or smaller modular boilers are used. It is very rarely used in a
domestic setup though instances can be found. A "flue booster" unit is
fitted in the conventional flue and a flow switch is incorporated to
ensure that if the fan fails,the burner stays off. Similar fan units
can be fitted to chimney pots etc. Agreed it is less than ideal as it
doesnt help boiler efficiency.Far better to install something more
suitable for the situation....

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jon Rouse  
View profile  
 More options Jan 28 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Jon Rouse <rou...@it.postoffice.co.uk>
Date: 1998/01/28
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

Mike Paley wrote:

> Unfortunately, I'm not sure of my competence to take the car back to the
> garage and competently complain that they've done a bodge job of fitting my
> exhaust. Both new joints leak, one badly and at least the tail pipe has
> mountings missing !

If the garage is one of a chain, go to another garage in the chain and say 'My
exhaust seems a bit dodgy - can you fix it'.

Then, when presented with the bill, produce your receipt from the other garage
and tell them to claim from them.

--
The views expressed are my own and may not represent those of my employer.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Matthew Marks  
View profile  
 More options Jan 30 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: nob...@rd.bbc.co.uk (Matthew Marks)
Date: 1998/01/30
Subject: Re: Idiotic advice

In article <296439243...@paley.demon.co.yuk>,
        Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk> writes:

> In article: <6a9ppr$...@bbcnews.rd.bbc.co.uk>  nob...@rd.bbc.co.uk (Matthew
> Marks) writes:
>:) > E.g. fit the boiler with it's normal flue but duct it into a pipe with
> a
>:) > fan in it or something.
>:)
>:) That is the most idiotic piece of advice I have seen in this newsgroup
> for a
>:) long time.
>:)

> Go on then, explain.

Thank you to others who have correctly guessed my worries in my absence from
this thread.  Making throw-away remarks like that, with no mention of fan
failure detectors, etc, might just encourage someone without sufficient
knowledge (like MOST of us when it comes to gas flues) to take your advice
literally, and create a very dangerous installation.  As has also been pointed
out, they might not know about it because of the nature of carbon monoxide.

--
Matthew @rd.bbc.co.uk  My opinions, not Auntie's  *RETURN ADDRESS SPAMPROOFED*


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable" by Matthew Marks
Matthew Marks  
View profile  
 More options Jan 30 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: nob...@rd.bbc.co.uk (Matthew Marks)
Date: 1998/01/30
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

In article <348110336...@paley.demon.co.yuk>,
        Mike Paley <m...@paley.demon.co.yuk> writes:

> I'd have though allyminium would be worse as it's more reactive. But it's
> chemistry - and that's where I shut up !

I thought the point about Al was its oxide (see welding thread) which is
impermeable and very non-reactive.  It forms pretty instantly and protects
the metal underneath.

--
Matthew @rd.bbc.co.uk  My opinions, not Auntie's  *RETURN ADDRESS SPAMPROOFED*


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Matthew Marks  
View profile  
 More options Jan 30 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: nob...@rd.bbc.co.uk (Matthew Marks)
Date: 1998/01/30
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

In article <34CD9DE1.7...@nortel.co.uk>,
        Alan Briggs <Alan.Briggs.2818...@nortel.co.uk> writes:

> At present the Energy Saving Trust (government sponsored organisation)
> is offering a £200 cashback on condensing boilers from a list of
> approved suppliers.

But isn't taht only if the boiler's fitted professionally, thereby neatly
wiping out the saving?  (CORGI police: please keep quiet.)

--
Matthew @rd.bbc.co.uk  My opinions, not Auntie's  *RETURN ADDRESS SPAMPROOFED*


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andy Wade  
View profile  
 More options Feb 1 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Followup-To: uk.d-i-y
From: "Andy Wade" <ajw...@dial.pipex.com>
Date: 1998/02/01
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

Matthew Marks wrote ...

> But isn't taht only if the boiler's fitted professionally, thereby neatly
> wiping out the saving?

That was my understanding too.

> (CORGI police: please keep quiet.)

It's perfectly legal provided that you are "competent", but don't let's
start that thread again.

--
Andy


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nick Lusty  
View profile  
 More options Feb 3 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: Nick Lusty <NGLU...@dera.gov.uk>
Date: 1998/02/03
Subject: Re: Are Condensing Boilers Less Reliable

That is what it says in the leaflet says.  And it must be fitted before
the end of this month.  Where is a good place to go to for condensing
boilers - how much would a 80,000 BTU output boiler resonably cost?
Would you recommend one?

Andy Wade wrote:
> That was my understanding too.

Matthew Marks wrote ...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »