Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Wide Range of Macs for Sale

2 views
Skip to first unread message

michaelParker

unread,
Sep 5, 2003, 11:14:24 AM9/5/03
to
Hello List-dwellers,

Community Technology is a charitable computer training and recycling
organisation based in Brixton, south London. We recycle and resell a huge
variety of slightly-older-than-recent machines and peripherals, mostly PCs
but increasingly Macintoshes of all kinds. As the only UK-Mac lists, I
thought a mention here might generate some interest:

A selection of our current stock:

-- 5x 7300/200 - fast 604e CPU, with ample RAM and 2Gb disks
-- various 7600 - 132/166, 604 CPUs, with built in S-video and AV
connectors, 1/2Gb disks
-- 5x 7500/100 - 601 CPUs, most with 500Mb disks and RAM, all with
S-video/AV
-- 12x biege G3s - 750 CPUs, 233-266, with larger disks and more RAM,
etc.
-- Quadra650s - various.
-- Several 6100s, 7100, 7200s, all in various states, some in need of
RAM/VRAM etc.
-- 5000 series monitor-all-in-one style Performa's
-- montiors, including about 10x 19-21 inch apple montors (with DB15
Apple connectors)
-- We even have some iMacs, though you'll have to haggle pretty hard to
get them off us.

Basically, I've spent a fair bit of time sorting through them making sure
they have a fair amount of RAM/VRAM and cache to put them in good working
order. They almost all have an OS installed. I'd like to see them go to a
good home, and cease taking up space on our shelves.

If anyone is interested in purchasing these fine machines and putting them
to more use than we are, please contact us at
c...@community-nospam-technology.org.uk (..._remove it_....obviously..). We
are selling them for very reasonable rates (from about a tenner upwards, and
they come with ADB keyboard and mouse (for the better ones, anyway), and
monitors by agreement.

thanks for your time, pls excuse me for crossposting/possible relevance
issues.


michael

Senior Engineer,
Commtech Computer Recyling

Nic P

unread,
Sep 5, 2003, 6:37:54 PM9/5/03
to
Adverts are not allowed in the uk.comp.sys.mac group.

(Some hard core fans of this NG may already have taken a contract out on
you by now :-) so run... run while you can!!! :-)

Stroller

unread,
Sep 6, 2003, 10:53:41 AM9/6/03
to
"michaelParker" <justanothe...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:<bja98g$ouh$1...@titan.btinternet.com>...

> Hello List-dwellers,
>
> Community Technology is a charitable computer training and recycling
> organisation based in Brixton, south London. We recycle and resell a huge
> variety of slightly-older-than-recent machines and peripherals, mostly PCs
> but increasingly Macintoshes of all kinds. As the only UK-Mac lists, I
> thought a mention here might generate some interest:
>...

I know the original post was arguably OT: (but can't we make
excpetions forcharitable organisations?) but whilst we're on the
subject of 2nd-hand old Macs, I seem to recall someone a while back
sold something that looked a bit like this, but in black:
http://www.apple-history.com/frames/body.php?page=gallery&model=5500

I seem to recall it was a couple of hundred megahertz and could be
upgraded to a G3 or so. I rather fancy something like this for the
bedroom - if it won't run OS X, then presumably Linux would work fine.

Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for, or would I be better
off buying a transparent iMac..?

Stroller.

Clive Sweeting

unread,
Sep 6, 2003, 11:27:24 AM9/6/03
to
On 6/9/03 15:53, in article 385cfcc.03090...@posting.google.com,
"Stroller" <stro...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> I seem to recall it was a couple of hundred megahertz and could be
> upgraded to a G3 or so. I rather fancy something like this for the
> bedroom - if it won't run OS X, then presumably Linux would work fine.

Yep. But if you don't want the TV function, get an iMac.



> Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for, or would I be better
> off buying a transparent iMac..?

PowerMac 5500; get one with the TV tuner and remote. Perfect bedroom
machine, if you can stand OS 9 (duck's for cover).

D.M. Procida

unread,
Sep 6, 2003, 3:03:10 PM9/6/03
to
Stroller <stro...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> I seem to recall it was a couple of hundred megahertz and could be
> upgraded to a G3 or so. I rather fancy something like this for the
> bedroom - if it won't run OS X, then presumably Linux would work fine.

It would have been a 5500 - a nice machine. But don't bother upgarding
it to a G3 - it will still only use CRAM (Costly RAM) DIMMs, not SDRAM,
it has a slower ATA bus, its video chip is nothing to right home about
and if you did get eventually Mac OS running on it it would be a pretty
sad experience.

It will run Linux happily enough, but much of the charm of the 5500 was
its integrated bits and pieces (remote, TV/FM tuner, video-in card,
bundled software), none of which will be much use to a Linux user.

Daniele
--
Apple Juice Ltd
Chapter Arts Centre
Market Road www.apple-juice.co.uk
Cardiff CF5 1QE 029 2019 0140

Stuart Bell

unread,
Sep 6, 2003, 6:03:03 PM9/6/03
to
stro...@bigfoot.com (Stroller) wrote in message news:<385cfcc.03090...@posting.google.com>...


>
> I know the original post was arguably OT: (but can't we make
> excpetions forcharitable organisations?) but whilst we're on the
> subject of 2nd-hand old Macs, I seem to recall someone a while back
> sold something that looked a bit like this, but in black:
> http://www.apple-history.com/frames/body.php?page=gallery&model=5500
>
> I seem to recall it was a couple of hundred megahertz and could be
> upgraded to a G3 or so. I rather fancy something like this for the
> bedroom - if it won't run OS X, then presumably Linux would work fine.
>
> Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for, or would I be better
> off buying a transparent iMac..?

Black 5500 - up to 300Mhz. Also 5400 up to, I think, 180MHz.

G3 upgrades go in the L2 cache slot.

The basic machines are now dirt cheap, even in Black, the beige
equivalents being almost unsellable on eBay.

I sold a black case kit to make a beige one nice for around £15 last
week!

To be really nice, make sure you get a black keyboard to go with it -
sold separately, they're worth as much as the Mac!

129Mb memory limit is the only architecture problem - they were very
nice Macs in their day.

Personally, I think they're more elegant than the earlu iMacs, but
that's just a personal opinion. Certainly less computer-like for the
bedroom!

Stuart

PeterD

unread,
Sep 6, 2003, 7:09:23 PM9/6/03
to
D.M. Procida <{$usenet$}@apple-juice.co.uk> wrote:

> its video chip is nothing to right home about

Oh no, Daniele has been illiterated.

--
Pd

Stroller

unread,
Sep 6, 2003, 8:07:54 PM9/6/03
to
Clive Sweeting <cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk> wrote in message news:<BB7FBB6C.46E4B%cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk>...

> On 6/9/03 15:53, in article 385cfcc.03090...@posting.google.com,
> "Stroller" <stro...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> > I seem to recall it was a couple of hundred megahertz and could be
> > upgraded to a G3 or so. I rather fancy something like this for the
> > bedroom - if it won't run OS X, then presumably Linux would work fine.
>
> Yep. But if you don't want the TV function, get an iMac.

I didn't know they had TV. Looking at iMacs in eBay's completed items
it looks like I can get a G3 333mhz for £199 or a G3 266mhz for £150.
I'll go & take a look at Woody's recent posting & see what iMac he's
running Panthar on.

> > Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for, or would I be better
> > off buying a transparent iMac..?
>
> PowerMac 5500; get one with the TV tuner and remote. Perfect bedroom
> machine, if you can stand OS 9 (duck's for cover).

No fear! If I get one of these it'll get Linux on it! One went on eBay
a week ago for £26. That's more in my price-range at present, and
seems quite reasonable for a unit with built-in monitor & CD-rom,
gnatty black k/b & mouse & a 225mhz processor. Sounds almost pokey
enough for OS X!!

Stroller.

Woody

unread,
Sep 6, 2003, 8:58:30 PM9/6/03
to
Stroller <stro...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> Clive Sweeting <cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk> wrote in message
news:<BB7FBB6C.46E4B%cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk>...
> > On 6/9/03 15:53, in article 385cfcc.03090...@posting.google.com,
> > "Stroller" <stro...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I seem to recall it was a couple of hundred megahertz and could be
> > > upgraded to a G3 or so. I rather fancy something like this for the
> > > bedroom - if it won't run OS X, then presumably Linux would work fine.
> >
> > Yep. But if you don't want the TV function, get an iMac.
>
> I didn't know they had TV. Looking at iMacs in eBay's completed items
> it looks like I can get a G3 333mhz for £199 or a G3 266mhz for £150.
> I'll go & take a look at Woody's recent posting & see what iMac he's
> running Panthar on.

Its an original bondi blue iMac revision a (233MHz). I just put a later
beta on it and its still running well - although I am not too keen on
the new sheets.

> > > Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for, or would I be better
> > > off buying a transparent iMac..?
> >
> > PowerMac 5500; get one with the TV tuner and remote. Perfect bedroom
> > machine, if you can stand OS 9 (duck's for cover).
>
> No fear! If I get one of these it'll get Linux on it! One went on eBay
> a week ago for £26. That's more in my price-range at present, and
> seems quite reasonable for a unit with built-in monitor & CD-rom,
> gnatty black k/b & mouse & a 225mhz processor. Sounds almost pokey
> enough for OS X!!

not even close!


--
Woody
Alienrat Design Ltd

Jim

unread,
Sep 7, 2003, 3:17:37 AM9/7/03
to
Stuart Bell <maca...@tesco.net> wrote:

> 129Mb memory limit is the only architecture problem - they were very
> nice Macs in their day.

I seem to recall that the serial ports had issues as well - weren't they
highly unreliable above 9600 baud?

Jim
--
j...@magrathea.plus.com AIM/iChat:JCAndrew2 - now with iSight!
"We deal in the moral equivalent of black holes, where the normal
laws of right and wrong break down; beyond those metaphysical
event horizons there exist ... special circumstances" - Use Of Weapons

SteveH

unread,
Sep 7, 2003, 6:30:38 AM9/7/03
to
Stroller <stro...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> > > Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for, or would I be better
> > > off buying a transparent iMac..?

I'm quite happily running OSX on a 333MHz iMac with 192MB memory - it's
much snappier on this machine than it is on the 360MHz iBook with 320MB
memory. The only thing I can put this down to is the better hard drive
and graphics performance of the desktop machine.



> > PowerMac 5500; get one with the TV tuner and remote. Perfect bedroom
> > machine, if you can stand OS 9 (duck's for cover).

> No fear! If I get one of these it'll get Linux on it! One went on eBay
> a week ago for £26. That's more in my price-range at present, and
> seems quite reasonable for a unit with built-in monitor & CD-rom,
> gnatty black k/b & mouse & a 225mhz processor. Sounds almost pokey
> enough for OS X!!

The PM5500 runs a 603 / 603e processor. Although you can get a hack to
allow OSX to run on these machines, ISTR that Jaguar won't.

If you're going to be happy running Linux, then a 5500 will be fine, but
I'd personally look for something with a G3 processor - the G3
all-in-one looks pretty good (if you can find one) - as it's a desktop
G3 with integrated monitor and PCI slot.
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800
VW Golf GL Cabrio (carb broken) - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 33 1.7ie
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Woody

unread,
Sep 7, 2003, 7:35:01 AM9/7/03
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> Stuart Bell <maca...@tesco.net> wrote:
>
> > 129Mb memory limit is the only architecture problem - they were very
> > nice Macs in their day.
>
> I seem to recall that the serial ports had issues as well - weren't they
> highly unreliable above 9600 baud?

Dont think so, I had a 56k modem working ok off one

D.M. Procida

unread,
Sep 7, 2003, 8:41:33 AM9/7/03
to
Jim <j...@magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> Stuart Bell <maca...@tesco.net> wrote:
>
> > 129Mb memory limit is the only architecture problem - they were very
> > nice Macs in their day.
>
> I seem to recall that the serial ports had issues as well - weren't they
> highly unreliable above 9600 baud?

No, they worked perfectly well. The 5200 had some odd port issues
though.

Jim

unread,
Sep 7, 2003, 8:43:25 AM9/7/03
to
Woody <use...@alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

> > I seem to recall that the serial ports had issues as well - weren't they
> > highly unreliable above 9600 baud?
>
> Dont think so, I had a 56k modem working ok off one

Ah. Must be a collision in my internal hash table.

Stuart Bell

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 2:22:51 AM9/8/03
to
st...@italiancar.co.uk (SteveH) wrote in message news:<1g0wyhp.1ft3tex1g87r1lN%st...@italiancar.co.uk>...


>
> If you're going to be happy running Linux, then a 5500 will be fine, but
> I'd personally look for something with a G3 processor - the G3
> all-in-one looks pretty good (if you can find one) - as it's a desktop
> G3 with integrated monitor and PCI slot.

Several slots, ISTR, which explains its size, and means that you're
probably the first person in the world to claim the the G3 AIO (aka
'The Molar') looks pretty good! ;-) ;-)

Stuart

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 4:37:45 AM9/8/03
to
Patrick Navin wrote:
> David Kennedy wrote:
>
>>
>> G3 AIO ? Have I missed something ?
>>
>
> Surely you remember the "Molar"? A beige all-in-one machine simlar in
> looks to the Performa 5200/5300 series and the PowerMac 5500 series but
> with a G3 board and CPU. Quite a decent machine if you can accept that
> it is hideously ugly.
>
> http://www.lowendmac.com/ppc/g3aio.shtml
>
> Patrick
>

Well no actually.......

Checks link. I seem to have either missed this or forgotten it
completely, I shall put it my want list immediately ;-)) [along with
a 20th Anniversary model]


But seriously, it seems to be a quite capable machine compared with the
5500 and - I suspect - not as expensive now as an iMac. Cheaper memory
than the 5500 too.....


--
David Kennedy

http://www.anindianinexile.com

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 4:38:47 AM9/8/03
to
Richard P. Grant wrote:
> In article <bjhdnc$iun8a$1...@ID-101424.news.uni-berlin.de>,

> Patrick Navin <mingemagnet...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>
>>David Kennedy wrote:
>>>
>>>G3 AIO ? Have I missed something ?
>>
>>Surely you remember the "Molar"? A beige all-in-one machine simlar in
>>looks to the Performa 5200/5300 series and the PowerMac 5500 series but
>>with a G3 board and CPU. Quite a decent machine if you can accept that
>>it is hideously ugly.
>>
>>http://www.lowendmac.com/ppc/g3aio.shtml
>
> Oh, AIndiaOscar, NOT ATen.
>
> I was wondering what a Mac with a GAU8 would do to the PC-dicks in this
> lab.
>

Liven them up a bit ????

Charles Kooy

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 10:42:00 AM9/8/03
to
Richard P. Grant <rp...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> In article <3F5C4017...@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid>,
> David Kennedy <david....@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid> wrote:


>
> > Richard P. Grant wrote:
> > > I was wondering what a Mac with a GAU8 would do to the PC-dicks in this
> > > lab.
> > >
> >
> > Liven them up a bit ????
>

> very briefly.
>
> *laugh*

I have an image of you in my mind, RPG, with you holding said GAU8
(well, on a mount, they're awfully heavy) and maniacally screaming
'dance winlots, dance!'.

It should be noted that this image is nothing new. It's the way I
picture you most of the time.

ck


--
__________________________________________________________
| Fight Spam! Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/ |

Charles Kooy

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 10:42:01 AM9/8/03
to
Clive Sweeting <cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk> wrote:

> duck's for cover

Oh come on froup members - was I the only one to spot the random
apostrophe?

Sheesh - The level of pedantry in this ucsm was a lot higher when I were
a lad. ;)

Charles Kooy

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 10:42:00 AM9/8/03
to
David Kennedy <david....@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid> wrote:

> Patrick Navin wrote:
> > David Kennedy wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> G3 AIO ? Have I missed something ?
> >>
> >
> > Surely you remember the "Molar"? A beige all-in-one machine simlar in
> > looks to the Performa 5200/5300 series and the PowerMac 5500 series but
> > with a G3 board and CPU. Quite a decent machine if you can accept that
> > it is hideously ugly.
> >
> > http://www.lowendmac.com/ppc/g3aio.shtml
> >
> > Patrick
> >
>
> Well no actually.......
>
> Checks link. I seem to have either missed this or forgotten it
> completely, I shall put it my want list immediately ;-)) [along with
> a 20th Anniversary model]
>

IIRC that was a US education only model.

ck

Patrick Navin

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 10:49:34 AM9/8/03
to
Charles Kooy wrote:

> Clive Sweeting <cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>duck's for cover
>
>
> Oh come on froup members - was I the only one to spot the random
> apostrophe?
>
> Sheesh - The level of pedantry in this ucsm was a lot higher when I were
> a lad. ;)
>
>

aye but ehrn you were a lad you had to buidl your own computers out of
gravel,spit and bits of old mongrel :)

Patrick

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 12:21:52 PM9/8/03
to
In article <1g0ztv3.1lpjlkk1cv1xr1N%charle...@despammed.com>,
charle...@despammed.com (Charles Kooy) wrote:

>> duck's for cover
>
>Oh come on froup members - was I the only one to spot the random
>apostrophe?

Yes but... Weariness occasionally sets in...

--
Peter

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 12:21:57 PM9/8/03
to
In article <bji4tt$j3rsf$2...@ID-101424.news.uni-berlin.de>,
Patrick Navin <mingemagnet...@btopenworld.com> wrote:

>aye but ehrn you were a lad you had to buidl your own computers out of
>gravel,spit and bits of old mongrel :)

And Lego. Don't forget that; I do hear that some people still do.

--
Peter

Bruce Horrocks

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 4:50:24 PM9/8/03
to
In message <1g0ztv3.1lpjlkk1cv1xr1N%charle...@despammed.com>, Charles
Kooy <charle...@despammed.com> writes

>Clive Sweeting <cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> duck's for cover
>
>Oh come on froup members - was I the only one to spot the random
>apostrophe?
>
>Sheesh - The level of pedantry in this ucsm was a lot higher when I were
>a lad. ;)

This ucsm? As opposed to the other ucsm?

;-)

--
Bruce Horrocks
Surrey
England
<firstname>@<surname>.plus.com -- fix the obvious for email

Charles Kooy

unread,
Sep 8, 2003, 5:46:39 PM9/8/03
to
Bruce Horrocks <spam...@nodomain.nodomain.us> wrote:

> This ucsm? As opposed to the other ucsm?

Damn (quickly thinks of an excuse).

Well, techically there's many UCSMs, considering the way Usenet works.
Each version on every Usenet server out there could be considered a
seperate UCSM. If you're really grasping at straws like I am, that is :)

ck

djs

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 7:38:47 AM9/9/03
to

> Clive Sweeting <cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > duck's for cover
>
> Oh come on froup members - was I the only one to spot the random
> apostrophe?
>
> Sheesh - The level of pedantry in this ucsm was a lot higher when I were
> a lad. ;)

Group? ;-)

Patrick Navin

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 4:53:48 AM9/9/03
to
Richard P. Grant wrote:
> In article <drown-48EF95....@mercury.nildram.net>,
> You're new here, aren't you?
>
> I was going to point you to
>
> http://home.clara.net/zoara/ucsm/dictionary.html
>
> then I realized that 'froup' isn't listed
> <glares at zoara>
>

why would anyone list froup? I thought it was as obvious as the E*h*op**n?
;-)

./ usr/bin/iDeglare -zoara

Patrick

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 5:35:01 AM9/9/03
to
Peter Ceresole wrote:
> In article <rpg14-04B340....@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>,

> "Richard P. Grant" <rp...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>>>Yes but... Weariness occasionally sets in...
>>
>>We understand, old man.
>>
>>Shall I get Kooy to fetch your pipes and slipper, Gramps?
>
>
> Just a glass of Wincarnis will do.
>

;-))

Gosh, a blast from the past !


Do they still make it ?

And what about Sanatogen ?

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 5:54:48 AM9/9/03
to
In article <3F5D9EC5...@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid>,
David Kennedy <david....@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid> wrote:

>> Just a glass of Wincarnis will do.
>>
>
>;-))
>
>Gosh, a blast from the past !
>
>
>Do they still make it ?
>
>And what about Sanatogen ?

I have no idea. I never even knew what 'Tonic wine' was- only that it was a
curious British thing, featured in 'Mrs Wilson's Diary' and was an oldie
tipple. But it certainly nails down a certain time and ethos.

Oh Christ, I Googled it. The original made from imported grape juice to
which has been added malt and meet extracts.

Pause while I nause out...

And yes, they still make it...

Sanatogen, on the other hand, now appear to make various vitamin
supplements.

--
Peter

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 5:57:27 AM9/9/03
to
Peter Ceresole wrote:
>
> I have no idea. I never even knew what 'Tonic wine' was- only that it was a
> curious British thing, featured in 'Mrs Wilson's Diary' and was an oldie
> tipple. But it certainly nails down a certain time and ethos.
>
> Oh Christ, I Googled it. The original made from imported grape juice to
> which has been added malt and meet extracts.
>

It must be a community drinking thing then, to encourage the old folks
to 'meet'.....

> Pause while I nause out...
>
> And yes, they still make it...
>

One to avoid then

> Sanatogen, on the other hand, now appear to make various vitamin
> supplements.
>

Right. I'll put that on the Xmas list along with the slippers.

;-))

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 5:58:22 AM9/9/03
to
In article <BB8361F89...@192.168.0.2>,
pe...@cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) wrote:

>Oh Christ, I Googled it. The original made from imported grape juice to
>which has been added malt and meet extracts.

Even worse- it's meat extracts.

Wine and Bovril.

--
Peter

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 5:59:32 AM9/9/03
to

Nothing new there though, what about Bulls Blood Hungarian [?] wine
which actually originally contained blood.....

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 6:31:19 AM9/9/03
to
In article <3F5DA484...@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid>,
David Kennedy <david....@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid> wrote:

>Nothing new there though, what about Bulls Blood Hungarian [?] wine
>which actually originally contained blood.....

Oh wow. It certainly doesn't contain any now, or at least it didn't when I
drank some a few years ago. But can you imagine what the original wine must
have tasted like before they added the blood...

--
Peter

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 6:33:39 AM9/9/03
to

AIUI, it was added more to add 'body' than taste, just to thicken the
wine.....

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 8:22:28 AM9/9/03
to
In article <3F5DAC8...@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid>,
David Kennedy <david....@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid> wrote:

>> But can you imagine what the original wine must
>> have tasted like before they added the blood...
>>
>
>AIUI, it was added more to add 'body' than taste, just to thicken the
>wine.....

Yes, I imagine that must have been the reason, but any wine that needs
blood in it must be pretty mingey to start with... Although presumably
we're talking traces here, not half'n half.

--
Peter

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 9:01:45 AM9/9/03
to

I really can't remember now although it seems to me they were talking
about up to 25%. But, it was a while ago, and, IIRC, it was in a Derek
Johnson article in the Sunday Times....

djs

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 12:38:49 PM9/9/03
to

> > > Clive Sweeting <cl...@sweet-apple.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > duck's for cover
> > >
> > > Oh come on froup members - was I the only one to spot the random
> > > apostrophe?
> > >
> > > Sheesh - The level of pedantry in this ucsm was a lot higher when I were
> > > a lad. ;)
> >
> > Group? ;-)
>
> You're new here, aren't you?
>
> I was going to point you to
>
> http://home.clara.net/zoara/ucsm/dictionary.html
>
> then I realized that 'froup' isn't listed
> <glares at zoara>

Ah ha, sadly I am not new, as many in this group will know, but have
many RL things to do, however I did get time to research enough to find
this

http://www.angelfire.com/journal/artdljunkie/spell.html

which explains that rather nicley, so...

thank you and have a nice day!

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 9:48:03 AM9/9/03
to
djs wrote:
>
> Ah ha, sadly I am not new, as many in this group will know, but have
> many RL things to do, however I did get time to research enough to find
> this
>

This _is_ RL; the rest is all an illusion.....

PeterD

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 10:19:53 AM9/9/03
to
David Kennedy <david....@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid> wrote:

> Nothing new there though, what about Bulls Blood Hungarian [?] wine
> which actually originally contained blood.....

Wonderful stuff. Only ever saw it once, then whenever I tried to get it
again, there was only some stupid Spanish stuff in a hessian cover with
a tacky plastic bull round the neck. I raved about it to various people
who looked at me like I'd claimed alien abduction.

Vinted in the mountains of Transylvania. Mmmmmm.

--
Pd

PeterD

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 10:28:14 AM9/9/03
to
djs <dr...@theflyingpub.removespam.co.uk> wrote:

> http://www.angelfire.com/journal/artdljunkie/spell.html
>
> which explains that rather nicley, so...

ooh, I like that. I like it when people of your elk post stuff like that
to this froup. Waay cool. And while I'm at it, have an ironic smiley {o;

--
Pd

PeterD

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 10:32:13 AM9/9/03
to
Richard P. Grant <rp...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> http://home.clara.net/zoara/ucsm/dictionary.html

That's *it*? Six measly words?
Have we really been so unoriginal to have coined only six new meanings
or words since onetime?

Pish.

--
Pd

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 10:42:48 AM9/9/03
to
In article <1g10yw3.1pfswsw10t95hrN%pd....@dsl.pipex.invalid>,
pd....@dsl.pipex.invalid (PeterD) wrote:

>And while I'm at it, have an ironic smiley {o;

Pah! I fart in the general direction of your "smileys".

--
Peter

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 10:54:56 AM9/9/03
to

I never tried the genuine stuff, the only time I saw a bottle the label
mentioned how things _used_ to be originally but no longer; so I put it
back.....

David Kennedy

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 10:56:14 AM9/9/03
to
PeterD wrote:
>
>
> ooh, I like that. I like it when people of your elk post stuff like that
>

Are the Elks like the Rotary Club or am I thinking of the FreeMasons ?

PeterD

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 11:11:48 AM9/9/03
to
Richard P. Grant <rp...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> In article <1g10yze.1ah8gjbdz86yN%pd....@dsl.pipex.invalid>,

> Eh no - zoara has been tardy.

Oi. Calling someone a tard is fairly incorrect, politically speaking.

--
Pd

PeterD

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 11:13:24 AM9/9/03
to
David Kennedy <david....@no.spam.today.thanks.invalid> wrote:

> PeterD wrote:
> >
> >
> > ooh, I like that. I like it when people of your elk post stuff like that
> >
>
> Are the Elks like the Rotary Club or am I thinking of the FreeMasons ?

No, elk is a kind of pomade.

--
Pd

Peter Ashby

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 1:18:06 PM9/9/03
to
In article <BB8361F89...@192.168.0.2>,
pe...@cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) wrote:

>
> I have no idea. I never even knew what 'Tonic wine' was- only that it was a
> curious British thing, featured in 'Mrs Wilson's Diary' and was an oldie
> tipple. But it certainly nails down a certain time and ethos.
>

Up here 'tonic wine' has only one name, Buckie. AKA Buckfast, made by
some monks in the north of England. Much favoured by the sort who are
more interested in getting pissed quickly and cheaply than in quality of
the experience. There would have been a fair bit of Buckie consumed
around Hampden before the stunning and courageous win against those
giants of European football, the Faroes.

Peter

--
Peter Ashby
School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Scotland
To assume that I speak for the University of Dundee is to be deluded.
Reverse the Spam and remove to email me.

Bruce Horrocks

unread,
Sep 9, 2003, 2:24:11 PM9/9/03
to
In message <1g10dg0.1px6ebi80qw25N%charle...@despammed.com>, Charles
Kooy <charle...@despammed.com> writes

>Bruce Horrocks <spam...@nodomain.nodomain.us> wrote:
>
>> This ucsm? As opposed to the other ucsm?
>
>Damn (quickly thinks of an excuse).
>
>Well, techically there's many UCSMs, considering the way Usenet works.
^^^
there are

>Each version on every Usenet server out there could be considered a
>seperate UCSM. If you're really grasping at straws like I am, that is :)

Enough pedantry yet?

Charles Kooy

unread,
Sep 10, 2003, 4:51:45 AM9/10/03
to
Bruce Horrocks <spam...@nodomain.nodomain.us> wrote:

>
> >
> >Well, techically there's many UCSMs, considering the way Usenet works.
> ^^^
> there are
>
> >Each version on every Usenet server out there could be considered a
> >seperate UCSM. If you're really grasping at straws like I am, that is :)
>
> Enough pedantry yet?

That was, of course, entirely intentional. A test, if you will. ;)

And you missed the incorrect spelling of 'technically'. So there. Ha! I
win (runs away)

Adrian Tuddenham

unread,
Sep 10, 2003, 8:33:26 AM9/10/03
to
Peter Ashby <p.r....@MAPS.dundee.ac.uk> wrote:


> Up here 'tonic wine' has only one name, Buckie. AKA Buckfast, made by
> some monks in the north of England.

Puzzled. Buckfast Abbey is down here in the South.


--
~ Adrian Tuddenham ~
(Change 'offline' to 'online' to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

zoara

unread,
Sep 10, 2003, 8:35:36 AM9/10/03
to
PeterD <pd....@dsl.pipex.invalid> wrote:

I'm too lazy^Wbusy

-z-

--
"I'm not sure how useful this is, but it's bloody clever."
- Jonathon Sanderson in uk.comp.sys.mac
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

Peter Ashby

unread,
Sep 10, 2003, 12:54:45 PM9/10/03
to
In article <1g12o80.1bo7y3i1dbdzzsN%popp...@ukOFFline.co.uk>,
popp...@ukOFFline.co.uk (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote:

> Peter Ashby <p.r....@MAPS.dundee.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> > Up here 'tonic wine' has only one name, Buckie. AKA Buckfast, made by
> > some monks in the north of England.
>
> Puzzled. Buckfast Abbey is down here in the South.

Hmm, I could be wrong, might be wrong and in the light of the above even
probably wrong.

0 new messages