Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Preserving SSDs
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Greg Hennessy  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2012, 6:44 pm
Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux
From: Greg Hennessy <m...@privacy.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:44:02 +1100
Local: Fri, Nov 16 2012 6:44 pm
Subject: Re: Preserving SSDs

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:43:15 +0000, Folderol <folde...@ukfsn.org> wrote:

[snip]

>> Conclusion:
>> "With current technologies write endurance is not a factor you should be
>> worrying about when deploying flash SSDs for server acceleration
>> applications - even in a university or other analytics intensive
>> environment. "

>Int'restin'

>I think I will still at least do the noatime and discard thing though. A for
>the rest, it depends on how much I end up worrying :)

Take a look at the MLC versus TLC wear figures over time in the table here

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6459/samsung-ssd-840-testing-the-endura...

and if you really need convincing, someone has stepped up and performed a
heroic series of endurance tests here

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?271063-SSD-Write-E...

It really is a non issue.
--
?ˇaah, los gringos otra vez!?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.