I've recently registered my company. I'm on CSA1 and there are some 
questions as to whether share dividends are counted for CSA calcs, I 
think I saw that they are not counted under CSA2 on the CSA website, but 
I'm not willing to take that chance. Hence, I have made my wife the 
director and myself the secretary - I'm hoping this will help with S660, 
too.
I am doing salaried work at the moment but as soon as I start getting a 
few good contracts, it will be time to quit. I'll be paying myself 
minimum wage and my wife enough to bump up our combined wage for 
subsistence living. As the shareholder, my wife will be eligible for the 
share dividends.
Interesting information about thew 10,000 mile cutoff point for the 40p 
allocation - I wasn't aware of that. Also, some very useful information 
about other expenses that can be claimed - thanks for that!
The net result CSA-wise and ex-wise. I suspect that the recalculation 
will (hopefully) put me in the minimum liability bracket which should 
force my ex to come to an agreement away from the CSA (Just like I 
suggested to her two years before they finally came up with a figure)
At the moment, I am working for a very low wage. I have professional 
certifications coming out of my ears but there is no way I'm going to 
take a job paying 2-3 times what I currently earn just so my ex can buy 
her latest boyfriend another bloody motorbike - it won't benefit my 
children one iota.
</rant>
I have crossposted to uk.business.accountancy - Would anybody in (t)here 
have any more knowledge as to how to maximise the income for people 
setting up on their own, with respect to CSA liabilities?
VMT,
Me Now.
-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
"Me Now" <Me....@No.way> wrote in message 
news:469b7449$0$16357$8826...@free.teranews.com...
Do you perceive a promlem with the CSA if I am acting as company 
secretary? I don't own any shares and my wife is the director. If the CSA 
can get any of the company, my wife will close it down.
Me Now.
"Fletcher" <fletch...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
news:LpudnegKZoj...@giganews.com: 
If you both work hard and build somthing that is good why should you be 
forced to close it?
Use the system it has safe areas.
Your biggest potential problem as secretery is your accountant, csa  can 
demand he feed them everything he knows about the company. As an emplyee 
they couldn't touch him.
"Me Now" <me....@no.way> wrote in message 
news:Xns9970E9332E4E3lk...@66.150.105.47...
Me Now
"Fletcher" <fletch...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
news:LpudnegKZoj...@giganews.com: 
> Couldn't you get someone else to be secretery, dad, brother, cousin,
Service fully approved by the Inland Revenue.
£1,000,000 Professional Indemnity Cover is included.
The umbrella company option provides a comprehensive and generous expense
policy.
When you don't work, you don't pay (their fee is a tax deductable expense..
£18 per week if paid weekly or £54 a month if paid monthly).
Umbrella services require no joining fee, and no termination fee.
Payslips detail Income, Expenses and deductions.
The umbrella option provides a Group Pension Scheme.
Umbrella companies enable income confirmation to support credit / mortgage
applications and income confirmation to the CSA.
Umbrella Company - How it works?
Several contractors will operate simultaneously through the same umbrella
company. You would simply swap your contract with the agency or client to a
contract of employment with our limited company.
Under the umbrella company option, we share a mutual expectation that any
contract that you take up with Danbro will be followed by subsequent
contracts in the future. If you do not agree with this expectation, then
please contact the office as soon as possible.
Your role is:
To source and decide on the contract that will best suit your needs and
skills, informing the agency/ client that you will be operating through our
umbrella company. The contract will then be made out between our limited
company and the agency/client naming you as the contractor. You will then
become an employee of our umbrella company, by signing our contract of
employment.
To submit timesheets and expenses to us by email, fax, or post.
To submit your personal claim for allowable expenses on our expenses claim
form along with supporting receipts.
"Fletcher" <fletch...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:XfmdnR5r0_4...@giganews.com...
Someone is having a good lauhat your expense. To claim that these scemes 
are approved is the biggst joke of all. Its telling that the people who 
claim this dont even know that the Inland Revenue ceased to exist over 
two years ago. Umbrella Companies are considered an avoidance device and 
fall very short of the f word.
If the individual who claims this is not the case would care to call at 
my Office, he might just learn to what extent these schemes are "Approved".
Paying yourself NMW is still giving the CSA something to attach a debt 
to. Expenses claimed still have to satisfy S336, S337 and S338 ITEPA 
2003. Dividends can only be voted on profits and then are not tax free 
as he has claimed. You still have to be an SA taxpayer so you only delay 
  the date you pay the tax.
Of course, anyone who is planning to do anything they can to avoid 
taking responsibility as a parent probably has the morals of a skunk and 
so I am waisting my breath.
Whilst I cannot speak for JMC, I know the vast majority of posters in 
ugac are not trying to avoid taking responsibilty for ther children, 
quite the opposite. They are trying to prevent the CSA from removing 
income from themselves, which most, myself included, would have spent on 
our children in the first place. Not all of this money goes to the PWC 
(Parent With Care), the CSA regularly messes up payments - the system is 
broken. You seem to be suggesting that the only person who knows how to 
spend money on our children is the PWC, when all too often that is 
obviously not the case.
Going back to the main topic of the post, I will not be operating under 
an umbrella company, as I said, I have formed a limited company and I 
will be operating in that company name. Thanks for the warning, though!
Me Now.
Original newsgroup restored.