UFFS

In functions uffs_TreeInit(uffs_Device *dev), dev->tree.erased_count = 0; dev->cfg.

where to modify to use bad block handling in uffs?? Is there documentation available ?? Or any

hi, I'm facing problem to porting uffs to spi nand flash Is there any porting documents??? means,

hi, there are a lot of file in uffs library folder , which files should i include in microcontroller

Hi Chris, When using UFFS on NOR flash, you can simply take part of the page as "spare area

Hi Ricky, I finally have UFFS running in my system! It has been working very well for all operations.

Hi Ricky, Still trying to get UFFS up and running on my platform. I have the southbound side wired up

For your quesion (3), yes you should manually populate and taken from offs_TagStoreSt which passed to

Hi Gil, Yes you are correct, the CPU time hit is predictable. Knowing of UFFS being used in projects

Page大小是4096，应用层是按4096大小写入的。实际由于mini head数据大小是4092/page，结果写8个block产生了43次block recover。应用层改成每次写入4092大小，

On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 2:29:25 PM UTC-6, Ricky wrote: Hi Fred, No, deleting a file is not

Hello! There is a problem when the func uffs_BufFlush_Exist_With_BlockCover() is called. The debug

Does UFFS implement erase counters? It would be quite useful to know average/min/max number of times

Suggest moving FD_OFFSET into uffs_config.h Rationale: UFFS may not be the only source of FDs in the

Hi Sergei, The reason I couldn't use it - it has a significant RAM footprint for various data

On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 4:36:12 PM UTC-5, Ricky wrote: Yes, it's safe to redefine these

Ricky, Thank you for the prompt reply. I was a bit worried about low activity on the mailing list but

Hi Sergei, In fact a mutex might be better. For the project I had, it made no difference, as only one

On Monday, June 29, 2015 at 3:42:12 AM UTC-5, Ricky wrote: UFFS assume that when erasing a block, the

Yes it's bug, it should be fixed in commit 6149378161f6ebcc638c0e147fd2e6d89d786c70 Regards,

Hi Holger, Yes you just spotted a bug ! it should be '!='. Thanks, Ricky. On 27/05/2014, at

Hi Ricky, I have a case where I would like to recover as much data as possible if I get ECC failure

Thanks Savin, I'll take a look. It might be worth migrating to internal ECC at some point but the

Binary semaphore should be enough. Cheers, Ricky. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:14 AM, bowerymarc <

Yes that's the fix. It should be available on master branch by now. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:17

No, it's only implementing read/write page with layout and erase block. It's a Freescale

Thanks for your reply. I have modified CONFIG_PER_DEVICE_LOCK in uffs_fs.c to

It should return UFFS_FLASH_NO_ERR if WritePage()/WritePageWithLayout() function successfully marked

Thanks, I'll fix that. - Ricky On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:14 PM, ajron <vtoo...@gmail.com>

Thanks, I'll fix that. Regards, Ricky On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:44 PM, ajron <vtools.pl@gmail.