Articles of Impeachment: Florida 2000 and the 9/11/01 Pearl Harbor scenario
thoma...@hotmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/s011023/impeach_bush1.htm
IMPEACH BUSH
by
Thomas J. Wheat
George W. Bush was never legally elected President in the Florida 2000
elections. Also He was either complicit or inept in preventing the
9/11/01 terrorist attacks. It was his father's administration who put
Osama on the CIA payroll. He ignored multiple warnings that the
terrorists were going to strike. Finally Bush's family history shows
that his grandfather was a banker for adolph hitler, and that Bush was
in Business with James Bath who was in business with Osama Bin Laden's
elder brother, Salem Bin Laden. Bush must be impeached from office. He
is bad for America. He's allowed the NSA to spy on our phonecalls.
Bush will trample civil liberties to cement the Republican
establishment long after he is gone. Consider what would happen if Al
Gore would have won. We would have had two Democrat appointed Supreme
Court Justices. These are lifetime appointments. Presidents'
throughout history have used foreign policy to expand their control
over domestic policy. The White House Administration's War on Terror
is a cloak for partisanship, terrorist blackmail and is an attempt to
salvage the President's failed Domestic agenda.
The Florida 2000 Election Conspiracy
According to Greg Palast and Martin Luther King III Bush gerrymandered
the vote in Florida. In all it is believed that 90,000 eligible black
and Hispanic voters were denied the right to vote. These people were
denied the right to vote because Database Technologies (ChoicePoint)
incorrectly classified these eligible voters as felons. Florida
Secretary of State Kathleen Harris hired Database Technologies. She
was in charge of elections in Florida. It was Kathleen Harris who was
also in charge of Jeb Bush's reelection campaign. Database Tech. was
hired approximately a year before the elections offering a $4.3
million dollar bid to tabulate votes. The former company who had
tabulated the votes for Florida offered a bid for $5700 dollars.
The US civil Rights commission also found clear evidence of voter
disenfranchisement. http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/ch9.htm
Essentially, what happened was that if an eligible black voter with no
felonies on his record shared the same surname as another felon both
people were denied the right to vote. .
Some features of DBT's voting irregularities include for instance
people being charged for future crimes that they never had committed.
For instance take the case of Thomas Alvin Cooper, who was denied the
right to vote in 2000 for a crime he supposedly committed in 2007. All
told some 325 eligible voters were denied the right to vote because of
future crimes they had never committed. Remember Al Gore lost Florida
by 537 votes when the US Supreme Court stopped Florida vote recount.
Out of that 179,855 ballots were never counted.
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/12/09/president.election
Furthermore, 4917 eligible black voters were disqualified from voting
for felonies they never committed and for which DataBase Technologies
(ChoicePoint) had blank conviction dates.
Sources Cited:
US Commission on Civil Rights http://www.usccr.gov/ findings:
http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/ch9.htm
http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/appendix/lichtman/ltrpt.htm
http://dir.salon.com/story/politics/feature/2000/12/04/voter_file/index.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,824555,00.html
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/12/21/State/No_telling_if_voter_r.shtml
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/events/newsnight/1174115.stm
Greg Palast is a reporter for the BBC, the Observer, and the
Manchester Guardian. Also, he is the author of, "The Best Democracy
Money Can Buy," a book about the 2000 elections and multinational
corporate corruption.
Also Check out Alan Dershowitz's book: "Supreme Injustice: How the
High Court Hijacked Election 2000"Amazon.com Dershowitz is a professor
at Harvard Law school.
Dershowitz essentially argues in his book that the supreme court
decision Bush vs. Gore, 2000) violated the past supreme court ruling
Marbury v Madison 1803 specifically the principle of Judicial review.
(85) He argues that Article II of the US constitution gives state
legislatures the right to determine how they conduct
elections.Dershowitz argues that (Bush v. Gore, 2000) violates the
10th amendment. He argues that the 10th amendment and marbury versus
madison gives the state judiciary the right to rule on laws that are
contradictory, essentially the same power enjoyed by the us supreme
court. At issue was the fact that the Florida Supreme court had ruled
that pursuant to the Florida election law principle of Clear voter
intent via the numerous errors by the votomatic machines warranted an
extension of the secretary of state's voter certification deadline by
12 days in order to conduct a manual recount.
The supreme court in a 5-4 decision ruled on procedural grounds that
this violated article II. It should be noted that the five judges who
voted to stop the recount were all republican appointees. Florida's
clear voter intent law says even if ballots are improperly cast if
there is sufficient evidence to prove voter intent the ballots must be
counted.(59, 86-87) "manual recount authorized in section 102.166(4)
(d). Section 102.166(7)(b) states: If a counting team is unable to
determine a voter's intent in casting a ballot, the ballot shall be
presented to the county canvassing board for it to determine the
voter's intent. "
The certification deadline conflicted with the spirit of clear voter
intent because it made it impossible to conduct a manual recount when
there was strong evidence showing machine malfunction and confusingly
designed ballot cards. Dershowitz argues that according to the
principle of Judicial review the Florida Supreme court acted within
its jurisdiction by extending the voter certification deadline.
Bush filed suit to US supreme court relying on the doctrine of equal
protection from the 14th amendment. He argued that improperly cast
ballots regardless of the circumstances were void and should not be
counted. He argued that to count these ballots would be discriminatory
to him and create a process called voter dilution. Essentially he
argued that only properly submitted ballots should be cast (even
despite the mechanical error of the votomatic machines) and that to
count disqualified ballots would dilute his share of the vote and
thereby violate the Equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.
However, it should also be noted that many of the ballots properly
submitted were not tallied by the votomatic machines. Dershowitz
argues that Florida's Clear voter intent law is guranteed by the equal
protection clause. (57-61)
Dershowitz rightly states that The 14th amendment was originally
created to end discrimination against minority races and that it was
appaling that such a law was used to disenfranchise minorities when it
had been crafted for their benefit. The bush dominated supreme court
used that very same amendment to disenfranchise african american's
from voting. By far the largest number of rejected ballots were cast
by blacks and voters who traditionally voted democrat.(80) It should
be noted that the chief justice william Rehnquist was a strong
supporter of racial seggregation early on in his career. He argued
that Plessy vs. ferguson should be upheld and that brown v board of
education was unconstitutional.(Dershowitz, 142)
179,855 ballots were not counted because of the malfunctioning voting
machines or because in the case of butterfly ballots they were
designed ambigously. Only when the intial manual recount was closing
the gap on the Bush lead did he claim a violation of equal protection.
Furthermore the Supreme court cited no legal precedent (Stare Decisis)
for its ruling in nullyfying the state's rights jurisdiction of the
florida supreme court other than to say Article II had been violated.
(132)
It is humorous to acknowlege that republicans always bring up the
state's right argument but in this case they clearly violated the
power of the state court to interpret and rule on conflicting laws.
Justice Scalia almost always champions state's rights cases but in
this case his ruling reflected reactionary seggregationalist
federalism. (125)
Also the Newsweek article "The Truth behind the pillars," exposed the
fact that Justice Sandra day O'conner already had a partisan viewpoint
regarding the election. while at a party eyewitness accounts overheard
here saying that Gore's lead in the polls was 'terrible.'
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmnew/is_200012/ai_kepm319403
Of equal Interest: O'conner also signaled her intention to only retire
if a republican president was elected. (156) Also the "Uncle Tom"
Justice Clarence Thomas recieved less than favorable ratings from the
american bar association.(198) see "Thomas the least qualified nominee
so far?" National Law Journal 9/16/91 It should be noted Bush no
longer allows the ABA to screen prospective Judges. (200),
Inconclusion the supreme Court's ruling on article II actually
violated that statute. Article II does give the state's rights to have
their legislature determine how to conduct presidential elections.
However, you had to conflicting florida election laws. There was the
voter certification deadline and the clear voter intent law. The 10th
amendment and marbury versus madison 1804, gives the state judiciary
under the power of state's rights and judicial review to rule on
conflicting laws. The conservative arguements against this are weak
and they refuse to acknowlege that the voting machines did not even
tabulate some properly cast ballots. Furthermore the Supreme Court
cited no legal precedent in Bush v Gore, 2000. How would the
constitution of the United States of america or the Bill of Rights be
irrevocably harmed by the florida supreme court's ruling that the
voter certification deadline be extended by 12 days. Conservative
arguments against this are a red herring fallacy. The resulting
argument actually violates the rationale behind the equal protection
clause of the 14th amendment. Thus the procedural ruling
disenfrancised 179,000 people. Furthermore The ruling was partisan
since the judges who voted for the majority opinion were republican
appointees and those who were disenfranchised were blacks and democrat
voters. This proves that America no longer has a independant judiciary
the cornerstone of a true democracy!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background on the Bush family:
The NAZI Connection
Bush's grandfather Prescott Bush was a banker for Adolph Hitler. In
1942 He had his assets in the Union Banking Corporation seized under
the Trading with the Enemy Act. Prescott's Union Banking Corp worked
for Brown Brothers Harriman, which was owned by Nazi Financier Fritz
Thyssen. Bush helped Thyssen move assets through front companies
around the world. Thyssen became wealthy when Hitler decided to rearm
Germany. He had owned the largest steel company in Germany. Bush also
had financial dealings with several German companies who utilized
slave labor from NAZI concentration camps.
For more info: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html
Bush is also the descendant of English royalty on his mother's side.
This country was founded as the result of the tyranny of King George.
According to this Guardian article George Bush is a direct descendant
of William of Normandy. According the guardian, "Mr. Bush has direct
descents from William the Conqueror, Henry II and Charles II according
to Burke's Peerage."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/US_election_race/Story/0,2763,393341,00.html
BUSH'S ROLE IN THE 9/11/01 TERROIST ATTACKS
Bush and the CIA had plenty of warnings to know that Osama Bin Laden
was planning a terrorist attack on American soil. The first warning
that Osama was targeting US government installations was when his Al
Qaeda organization bombed the Khobar towers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in
1996. The second warning came in 1998when Osama bombed 2 US embassies
in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es alaam, Tanzania. The next warning came in
2000, when Osama bombed the US naval ship, the USS Cole.
The Warnings on Bush's Watch
On July 10th 2001, Kenneth Williams an agent with the FBI submitted a
memo to his superiors indicating that agents of Osama Bin Laden were
attending Arizona and Florida flight schools and that they were not
staying long enough to learn how to land. The FBI's Phoenix memo was
classified by the Counter terrorism Division as a low threat priority.
Two of the suspects in Williams's investigation, Hani Hanjour and
Nawaf al Hamzi later crashed flight 77 into the pentagon on 9/11/01.
Excerpt from the memo:
"The purpose of this communication is to advise the Bureau...of the
possibility of a coordinated effort by Usama Bin Laden to send
students to the United States to attend civil aviation
universities...Phoenix has observed an inordinate number of
individuals of investigative interest who are attending or who have
attended civil aviation colleges in the state of Arizona"
"Phoenix believes that it is more than a coincidence that subjects who
are supporters of UBL [Usama Bin Laden] are attending Civil aviation...
colleges in the state of Arizona. As receiving offices are aware,
Phoenix has had significant UBL associates/operatives living in the
state of Arizona conducting activity in support of UBL. Wadih El Hage,
a UBL lieutenant recently convicted for his role in the 1998 bombings
of US embassies in Africa, lived in Tuscon, Arizona for several years
in the 1980's."
sources:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0412042phoenix1.html
Kenneth Williams: Man of the Memo Sunday, May. 19, 2002 By DAVID
SCHWARTZ, ELAINE SHANNON AND MICHAEL WEISSKOPF
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,238561,00.htmlfix link
The second warning came when Bush was given a memo, entitled "Bin
Laden Determined to Strike US," in which it underlined that Bin Laden
was planning to "bring the fighting to America." Bush gave the memo
low priority.
Excerpt:
"Clandestine, foreign government and media reports indicate Bin Laden
since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the US."
The declassified version of the Memo is available @
http://us.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo
Bush also received warnings from German and Russian intelligence
services. Both The German and Russian sources said terrorists were
planning to hijack planes and that Al Qaeda was planning to attack US
interests.
Excerpts:
"German Intelligence alerted the Central Intelligence agency,
Britain's MI-6 intelligence service, Israel's Mossad in June 2001 that
Middle Eastern terrorists were training for Hijackings and targeting
American and Israeli interests...Russian President Vladimir Putin has
said publicly that he ordered his intelligence agencies to alert the
United States last summer [2001] that suicide pilots were training for
attacks on US Targets."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,53065,00.html
http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/06/26/8695.html
A total lapse in Judgment: The State Department's Visa Express Program
In June of 2001The US State department instituted a new program for
Saudi nationals wanting to visit the US. The Visa Express program did
not require a face to face interview. Most applicants only had to send
off their applications by mail to gain approval. According to Unger
and a US Consular official Jessica Vaughan, the mailing of
applications and approval of visas by mail created a likely scenario
of identity fraud.
Three people who were approved for Visas by the State Department's
Visa Express program in Saudi Arabia, turned out to 9/11 hijackers.
Their names were Abdulaziz Alomari, Khalid Almidhar and Salem Alhazmi.
Alomari with Muhammed Atta at the controls crashed Flight 11 into the
World trade center. Almidhar crashed Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
Alhamzi was on the same flight as Al-midhar.
Sources
Unger, Craig. "House of Bush House of Saud," pgs. 231, 247-248, 260
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/terror/articles/visa011212.htm
Collusion with other Intelligence sources:
Just as the two jets slammed into the World Trade Center, 5 Israelis,
two of them with ties to Mossad were seen videotaping the terrorist
attacks and were seen celebrating the event. A woman saw the melee and
called the police. By 4 pm the group was arrested. In the van the
police found $4700 dollars, foreign passports and box cutters, the
same used by the terrorist hijackers. After a brief incarceration the
group was deported in November 2001.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=77744&contrassID=/has%5C
A shot in the Dark
According to the Jewish Newspaper, Haaretz, in an article entitled
"Odigo says workers were warned of attack," by Yuval Dror, two
employees of the Odigo received instant messages warning that
terrorist attacks were going to occur a full two hours before they
happened.
Source: full URL? http://www.haartzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=77744
Irony or Prophesy
According to statement posted on former Congressman Christopher Cox's
website on the day of the terrorist attacks, Cox describes that he is
with Paul Wolfowitz and Don Rumsfeld discussing how they could win
enough votes for Bush's defense plan. Cox then says, Donald Rumsfeld
blurted out: "And let me tell you, I've been around the block a few
times. There will be another event." He repeated it with
emphasis""There will be another event." "Within minutes of that
utterance, Rumsfeld's words proved tragically prophetic." Christopher
Cox was the former republican chairman of the House Select Committee
on Intelligence. In 2005 he was appointed by Bush to be the chairman
of the SEC.
The Bush-Bin Laden Connection
According to Judicial Watch a public interst law firm in Washington
D.C. Bush's father worked for the Bin Laden family when he was on the
board of directors of the Carlyle group. The article goes on to
suggest that due to GHW Bush's financial dealings with the Bin Laden
group and the Saudi Arabian government, "..it raises, in the least a
conflict of interest problem." The article goes on to suggest that
Bush gave the Saudis the 'kid gloves' treatment after 9/11/01 despite
the fact that the majority of the hijakkers were Saudis. Unger himself
supports this assertion by stating, "Over time the Bin Laden's did
business with such icons of western culture as Disney, the Hard Rock
cafe, Snapple, and Porrsche. In the mid-nineties they joined various
members of the House of Saud in becoming business associates with
former Secetary of state James Baker and former President George H.W.
Bush by investing in the Caryle group..."(Unger, 6)
The Judicial Watch article suggests that is possible that the US's
deferential treatment shown to Saudi Arabia could be derived in part
to Bush's father's close relationship with the Saudi regime. Bush II
also had indiect ties to the Saudis in the 1980's. The Saudi's did so
because they were desirous of gaining the Attention of Bush's father
when he was Vice President and later President, by investing in his
son's failing companies, Arbusto and Harken energy. Bush was in
Business with James Bath who was in business with Osama Bin Laden's
elder brother, Salem Bin Laden. As Unger States:"...The Bin Laden's had
only indirect connections to Bush family and its allies. James Bath
the american business representitive of Salem Bin Laden, knew both
George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush. Khalid Bin Mafouz who was close
to the Bin Ladens and the royal family, had helped finance the Houston
Skyscraper for the Texas Commerce Bank, in which James Baker had a
significant stake. He also had ties to Bath." (Unger, 101)
http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer_1685.shtml
Unger, Craig. "House of Bush House of Saud," Scribner, 2004
The Great Escape
The US government allowed the Bin Laden family to fly out of the
country without being interrogated while all Air traffic had been
grounded in the days after the terrorist attacks. Certaintly this was
a sign of special treatment being accorded to the Bin Laden family by
Bush. Unger states; "On Tuesday, september 18th, at Logan Airport, a
specially reconfigured Boeng 727...had been chartered by the Bin
Ladens and flew 5 passengers, all of them members of the Bin Laden
family, out of the country from Boston."(11) The Bin Laden family was
allowed to leave the country without interrogation and was allowed to
fly when the FAA declared a ban on all privately chartered flights.
"The Commission's report omits the fact that the passenger Learjet
flew from Tampa to Lexington when restrictions on private plans were
still operative. " (Unger, 291)
In conclusion I hope this paper establishes some reasonable doubt in
the minds of Americans concerning the benign qualities of our
president. Consider the fact that Al gore won the popular vote and
Bush had to use the republican dominated Supreme Court to legitimise
his presidency. The fact is that the Bush re election campaign
committed fraud and disenfranchised thousands of african americans.
Also Bush was counting on the Pearl Harbor Syndrome to give him
unlimited power after 9/11. His approval ratings before 9/11 were
40-50% and right after 9/11 they skyrocketed. Now his ratings have
nose dived again and so he searchs for a way to use foreign policy and
terrorist blackmail to make him a leader who circumvents the
democratic process in the name of patriotism.
keywords: thomaswheat thomaswheat1975
Tom Jigme Wheat
http://geocities.com/s011023/trueconspiracylinks.html
excerpt:
George W. Bush was never legally elected President in the Florida 2000
elections. Also He was either complicit or inept in preventing the
9/11/01 terrorist attacks. It was his father's administration who put
Osama on the CIA payroll. He ignored multiple warnings that the
terrorists were going to strike. Finally Bush's family history shows
that his grandfather was a banker for adolph hitler, and that Bush was
in Business with James Bath who was in business with Osama Bin Laden's
elder brother, Salem Bin Laden. Bush must be impeached from office. He
is bad for America. He's allowed the NSA to spy on our phonecalls.
Bush will trample civil liberties to cement the Republican
establishment long after he is gone. Consider what would happen if Al
Gore would have won. We would have had two Democrat appointed Supreme
Court Justices. These are lifetime appointments. Presidents'
throughout history have used foreign policy to expand their control
over domestic policy. The White House Administration's War on Terror
is a cloak for partisanship, terrorist blackmail and is an attempt to
salvage the President's failed Domestic agenda.
The Florida 2000 Election Conspiracy
The US civil Rights commission also found clear evidence of voter
disenfranchisement. http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/ch9.htm
Essentially, what happened was that if an eligible black voter with no
felonies on his record shared the same surname as another felon both
people were denied the right to vote. .
Inconclusion the supreme Court's ruling on article II actually
violated that statute. Article II does give the state's rights to have
their legislature determine how to conduct presidential elections.
However, you had to conflicting florida election laws. There was the
voter certification deadline and the clear voter intent law. The 10th
amendment and marbury versus madison 1804, gives the state judiciary
under the power of state's rights and judicial review to rule on
conflicting laws. The conservative arguements against this are weak
and they refuse to acknowlege that the voting machines did not even
tabulate some properly cast ballots. Furthermore the Supreme Court
cited no legal precedent in Bush v Gore, 2000. How would the
constitution of the United States of america or the Bill of Rights be
irrevocably harmed by the florida supreme court's ruling that the
voter certification deadline be extended by 12 days. Conservative
arguments against this are a red herring fallacy. The resulting
argument actually violates the rationale behind the equal protection
clause of the 14th amendment. Thus the procedural ruling
disenfrancised 179,000 people. Furthermore The ruling was partisan
since the judges who voted for the majority opinion were republican
appointees and those who were disenfranchised were blacks and democrat
voters. This proves that America no longer has a independant judiciary
the cornerstone of a true democracy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
keywords: ultimateconspiracy, thomaswheat, article 2, article II,
equal protection clause, state's right's,
marbury v madison 1804, judicial review, 10th amendment, US
constitution, 14th Amendment, Florida voter intent law,
United States Commission on Civil Rights, US supreme Court, voter
disenfranchisement, database technologies,
butterfly ballot, bush is satan
On Jul 11, 12:37 pm, thomaswh...@hotmail.com wrote:
> The Case for the Impeachment of George W. Bushhttp://www.geocities.com/s011023/impeach_bush1.htm
> disenfranchisement.http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/ch9.htm
>
> Essentially, what happened was that if an eligible black voter with no
> felonies on his record shared the same surname as another felon both
> people were denied the right to vote. .
>
> Some features of DBT's voting irregularities include for instance
> people being charged for future crimes that they never had committed.
> For instance take the case of Thomas Alvin Cooper, who was denied the
> right to vote in 2000 for a crime he supposedly committed in 2007. All
> told some 325 eligible voters were denied the right to vote because of
> future crimes they had never committed. Remember Al Gore lost Florida
> by 537 votes when the US Supreme Court stopped Florida vote recount.
> Out of that 179,855 ballots were never counted.http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/12/09/president.elec...
> Furthermore, 4917 eligible black voters were disqualified from voting
> for felonies they never committed and for which DataBase Technologies
> (ChoicePoint) had blank conviction dates.
>
> Sources Cited:
>
> US Commission on Civil Rightshttp://www.usccr.gov/findings:http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/ch9.htmhttp://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/appendix/lichtman/ltrpt.htmhttp://dir.salon.com/story/politics/feature/2000/12/04/voter_file/ind...
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,824555,00.html
>
> http://www.gregpalast.com/the-great-florida-ex-con-gamernhow-the-felo...
> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=77744&contrassI...
>
> A shot in the Dark
> According to the Jewish Newspaper, Haaretz, in an article entitled
> "Odigo says workers were warned of attack," by Yuval Dror, two
> employees of the Odigo received instant messages warning that
> terrorist attacks were going to occur a full two hours before they
> happened.
>
> Source: full URL?http://www.haartzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=77744
>
> Irony or Prophesy
> According to statement posted on former Congressman Christopher Cox's
> website on the day of the terrorist attacks, Cox describes that he is
> with Paul Wolfowitz and Don Rumsfeld discussing how they could win
> enough votes for Bush's defense plan. Cox then says, Donald Rumsfeld
> blurted out: "And let me tell you, I've been around the block a few
> times. There will be another event." He repeated it with
> emphasis""There will be another event." "Within minutes of that
> utterance, Rumsfeld's words proved tragically prophetic." Christopher
> Cox was the former republican chairman of the House Select Committee
> on Intelligence. In 2005 he was appointed by Bush to be the chairman
> of the SEC.
>
> http://web.archive.org/20011125004259/http://cox.house.gov/press/rele...
James McGill
> My impeach bush webpage has moved to this address:
> http://geocities.com/s011023/trueconspiracylinks.html
> excerpt:
> George W. Bush was never legally elected President in the Florida 2000
> elections.
Florida sent its electors to DC with the consent of its legislature,
which is all that the Constitution requires.
Tom Jigme Wheat
yOUR A CROCK OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The supreme court decision violated the 10th amendment, marbury vs.
madison, stare decisis, judicial review and florida's own election
law. Not to mention it violated the equal protection clause by
disenfranchising blacks and democrats some 200,000 of them. Face it
you dont like niggers that's why you support Bush. Article II was not
violated since the 10th amendment and marbury v. madison 1804 permit
judicial review. Florida election law, specfically clear voter intent
law was passed by the state legislature authorizing manual recount
when evidence surfaced up that the votomatic machines were
malfunctioning (pregnant chad, hanging chad), ambigously designed
ballots (butterfly ballot) and that the election was to be decided by
5% or less margin of victory. You republicans are for state's rights
only when its for the rich and bigoted that's why the supreme court
denied Florida democrats universal sufferage. It makes sense since the
govenor was Bush's brother and the justices were all republican
appointees. That's why the ruling actually violated article II of US
constitution if you factor in the 10th amendment and marbury v.
madison as well.
Nice to know that the Chief Justice at the Time william rehnquist was
a strong supporter of plessy vs. ferguson aka state sponsered
seggregation early in his carreer having written briefs that Brown v.
board of education, 1954 was unconstitutional.
Inconclusion the official vote tally was illegitimate and partisan.
The florida delegates reflect the natural trend of voter
gerrymandering in florida one of the poorest state's in Union you
confederate pig that's why they always have a republican majority and
chain gangs for niggers and poor people.
CIAO!!!!!!!
Have a nice day
The Weasel
> On Jul 11, 5:25 pm, James McGill <jmcg...@email.arizona.edu> wrote:
>
> > Tom Jigme Wheat wrote:
> > > My impeach bush webpage has moved to this address:
> > >http://geocities.com/s011023/trueconspiracylinks.html
> > > excerpt:
> > > George W. Bush was never legally elected President in theFlorida2000
> > > elections.
>
> > which is all that the Constitution requires.
>
> yOUR A CROCK OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> The supreme court decision violated the 10th amendment,
Incorrect. You said yourself that they had the right to do so.
> marbury vs.
> madison, stare decisis, judicial review andflorida'sownelection
> law. Not to mention it violated the equal protection clause by
> disenfranchising blacks and democrats some 200,000 of them. Face it
> you dont like niggers that's why you support Bush. Article II was not
> violated since the 10th amendment and marbury v. madison 1804 permit
> judicial review.Floridaelectionlaw, specfically clear voter intent
> law was passed by the state legislature authorizing manual recount
> when evidence surfaced up that the votomatic machines were
> malfunctioning (pregnant chad, hanging chad), ambigously designed
> ballots (butterfly ballot) and that theelectionwas to be decided by
> 5% or less margin of victory. You republicans are for state's rights
> only when its for the rich and bigoted that's why the supreme court
> deniedFloridademocrats universal sufferage. It makes sense since the
> govenor was Bush's brother and the justices were all republican
> appointees. That's why the ruling actually violated article II of US
> constitution if you factor in the 10th amendment and marbury v.
> madison as well.
>
> Nice to know that the Chief Justice at the Time william rehnquist was
> a strong supporter of plessy vs. ferguson aka state sponsered
> seggregation early in his carreer having written briefs that Brown v.
> board of education, 1954 was unconstitutional.
> Inconclusion the official vote tally was illegitimate and partisan.
> Thefloridadelegates reflect the natural trend of voter
> gerrymandering infloridaone of the poorest state's in Union you
The Weasel
>
> > Tom Jigme Wheat wrote:
> > > My impeach bush webpage has moved to this address:
> > >http://geocities.com/s011023/trueconspiracylinks.html
> > > excerpt:
> > > George W. Bush was never legally elected President in the Florida 2000
> > > elections.
>
> > Florida sent its electors to DC with the consent of its legislature,
> > which is all that the Constitution requires.
>
> yOUR A CROCK OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I suggest that you read the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
> The supreme court decision violated the 10th amendment,
The US Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore was meaningless upon the
electors sent by the State of Florida (11/26/2000). Under the 12th
Amendment of the US Constitution, the courts have NO power to
determine if a slate of electors are the legal slate from the state,
thus those electors were not longer a state issue.
The Democrats on the Florida Supreme Court used a 12 day extension to
allow Bush to be certified the winner of the state (Palm Beach County
Canvassing Board v. Harris) on 11/26/2000. Once certified, the only
way Bush could lose the election was for Congress to challenge those
electors under the Electoral Count Act of 1887. The Democrats in the
Democrat controlled Senate failed to support the challenge (3 U.S.C.
section 15) on 1/6/2001, thus Congress accepted those Bush Florida
Electors as the legal slate from the state.
Once that challenge failed, Bush became the LEGALLY elected President
of the United States. No matter how much you want to bring up what
happened in Florida 2000, the election is over, both the Democrat
controlled Senate and the Republican Controlled House accepted the
results, thus the time to contest the election is over.
"Accordingly, in order to allow maximum time for contests pursuant to
section 102.168, amended certifications must be filed with the
Elections Canvassing Commission by 5 p.m. on Sunday, November 26, 2000
and the Secretary of State and the Elections Canvassing Commission
shall accept any such amended certifications received by 5 p.m. on
Sunday, November 26, 2000, provided that the office of the Secretary
of State, Division of Elections is open in order to allow receipt
thereof."
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/election/sc00-2346.pdf
> marbury vs.
> madison, stare decisis, judicial review and florida's own election
> law.
Incorrect. You said yourself that they had the right to do so.
"He argues that the 10th amendment and marbury versus madison gives
the state judiciary the right to rule on laws that are contradictory,
essentially the same power enjoyed by the us supreme court."
http://groups.google.com/group/political-conspiracy-and-the-quest-for-democracy/msg/56dc17a78f69c576
> Not to mention it violated the equal protection clause by
> disenfranchising blacks and democrats some 200,000 of them.
Made up numbers.
> Face it
> you dont like niggers that's why you support Bush. Article II was not
> violated since the 10th amendment and marbury v. madison 1804 permit
> judicial review. Florida election law, specfically clear voter intent
> law was passed by the state legislature authorizing manual recount
> when evidence surfaced up that the votomatic machines were
> malfunctioning (pregnant chad, hanging chad),
This is false. There is no such law. The courts in the state had
already ruled that pregnant and hanging chads were NOT the result of
malfunctioning machines, but were voter error, thus there was no
reason to hold a manual recount.
Broward v. Hogan, 1992
"Appellant explained that voter errors in the piercing of computer
ballot cards created loose or hanging paper chads which, although
present on the first count, subsequently fall away on a recount,
thereby causing the difference in count. Such voter errors, the board
explained, are caused by hesitant piercing, no piercing, or
intentional or unintentional multiple piercing of computer ballot
cards, creating what are referred to as overvotes and undervotes. The
board thereupon denied appellee's request for a recount."
http://election2000.stanford.edu/borward_hogan.html
> ambigously designed ballots (butterfly ballot)
Designed by a Democrat. Approved by a Democrat controlled election
board. Mailed to every voter BEFORE the election. And upheld by the
Democrat controlled Florida Supreme Court as NOT being ambiguous.
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/election/sc00-2373.pdf
> and that the election was to be decided by
> 5% or less margin of victory.
So what??
>You republicans are for state's rights
> only when its for the rich and bigoted that's why the supreme court
> denied Florida democrats universal sufferage.
This is false. The Supreme Court did not deny anyone the right to
vote. They stopped the Democrat majority on Florida Supreme Court from
changing Florida Election Law.
As the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court noted, the decision
handed down in Gore v. Harris was not based in Florida Law.
"My succinct conclusion is that the majority's decision to return this
case to the circuit court for a count of the under-votes from either
Miami-Dade County or all counties has no foundation in the law of
Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000, or at any time until the
issuance of this opinion. The majority returns the case to the circuit
court for this partial recount of under-votes on the basis of unknown
or, at best, ambiguous standards with authority to obtain help from
others, the credentials, qualifications, and objectivity of whom are
totally unknown. That is but a first glance at the imponderable
problems the majority creates."
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/election/OP-SC00-2431.pdf
>It makes sense since the
> govenor was Bush's brother and the justices were all republican
> appointees.
So what?? Elections are held on the county level, not the state. In
the 2000 election, the majority of those county election boards were
controlled by the Democrats.
> That's why the ruling actually violated article II of US
> constitution if you factor in the 10th amendment and marbury v.
> madison as well.
This is false. Bush v. Gore UPHELD the rights of the Florida State
Legislature as laid out in Article II of the US Constitution.