I downloaded your ucast at Work Friday, but forgot to take it home with me and now that link seems to be dead again - do you by chance have that wav file open in some application (I can't figure out why it refuses to download). I'm still ruminating on my ucast.
Carl
On 7/1/05, defwheezer <defwhee...@gmail.com> wrote:
Do you prefer these in .wav files, or mp3's? I know sometimes
starting with mp3s and then compressing them again results in
noticeable degradation in the sound. OTOH it usually takes a couple of
iterations before that happens.
So what's your preference, smaller mp3s or larger, non-lossy .wavs?
Makes production easiest. The compression issues are non-existant since the final podcast will be in 64 or 128 kbs anyhow (depending on whether there's just speech, or more music/effects). Wave file are not great since they are big muthas.
> Do you prefer these in .wav files, or mp3's? I know sometimes
> starting with mp3s and then compressing them again results in
> noticeable degradation in the sound. OTOH it usually takes a couple of
> iterations before that happens.
> So what's your preference, smaller mp3s or larger, non-lossy .wavs?
Makes production easiest. The compression issues are non-existant
since the final podcast will be in 64 or 128 kbs anyhow (depending on
whether there's just speech, or more music/effects). Wave file
are not great since they are big muthas.
Do you prefer these in .wav files, or mp3's? I know sometimes
starting with mp3s and then compressing them again results in
noticeable degradation in the sound. OTOH it usually takes a couple of
iterations before that happens.
So what's your preference, smaller mp3s or larger, non-lossy .wavs?
|
