We're attempting to get back to 70 requests per hour this week. We've just now raised the limit to 40 per hour and things are holding steady. If all continues to go well, we should be back to 70 today or tomorrow. We'll try to keep it there barring special events that are announced ahead of time.
Keep BlogHer on your radar as a "special event" in two weeks. Those mommybloggers are crazy on Twitter.
Otherwise, hopefully we can assum some semblance of normalcy shortly. Thanks for the good work and the update.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> wrote:
> We're attempting to get back to 70 requests per hour this week. We've > just now raised the limit to 40 per hour and things are holding > steady. If all continues to go well, we should be back to 70 today or > tomorrow. We'll try to keep it there barring special events that are > announced ahead of time.
Some of you have noticed that we've currently upped the allowed requests per hour to 100. We're still testing whether this rate works for us, but so far so good. We'll make a formal announcement once we know we can stick with it. At the very least, we won't be going back below 70.
This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per hour, send him ponies.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Terry Jones <terry.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> writes:
> Alex> We'll try to keep it there barring special events that are announced > Alex> ahead of time.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> wrote:
> Some of you have noticed that we've currently upped the allowed > requests per hour to 100. We're still testing whether this rate works > for us, but so far so good. We'll make a formal announcement once we > know we can stick with it. At the very least, we won't be going back > below 70.
> This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly > recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out > around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per > hour, send him ponies.
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Terry Jones <terry.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> writes:
> > Alex> We'll try to keep it there barring special events that are > announced > > Alex> ahead of time.
> Rock on, Twitter dev team, especially Evan! We appreciate your efforts!
> --Andy Badera
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> wrote:
>> Some of you have noticed that we've currently upped the allowed >> requests per hour to 100. We're still testing whether this rate works >> for us, but so far so good. We'll make a formal announcement once we >> know we can stick with it. At the very least, we won't be going back >> below 70.
>> This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly >> recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out >> around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per >> hour, send him ponies.
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Terry Jones <terry.jo...@gmail.com> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> writes:
>> > Alex> We'll try to keep it there barring special events that are >> announced >> > Alex> ahead of time.
Alex Payne wrote: > This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly > recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out > around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per > hour, send him ponies.
SQUEE! ^5, Evan! :-)
Now, if the friends/followers API data could just return correctly for users so Twitter Karma can work right again ... all would be right in the world! :-)
-- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
> Some of you have noticed that we've currently upped the allowed > requests per hour to 100. We're still testing whether this rate works > for us, but so far so good. We'll make a formal announcement once we > know we can stick with it. At the very least, we won't be going back > below 70.
> This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly > recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out > around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per > hour, send him ponies.
How about a beer? You guys drink beer, right? ;-)
-- ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com -- Kind of dangerous, but what fun is a safe shredder? -- Mike McFadden -------
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> wrote: > This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly > recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out > around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per > hour, send him ponies.
> Some of you have noticed that we've currently upped the allowed
> requests per hour to 100. We're still testing whether this rate works
> for us, but so far so good. We'll make a formal announcement once we
> know we can stick with it. At the very least, we won't be going back
> below 70.
> This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly
> recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out
> around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per
> hour, send him ponies.
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Terry Jones <terry.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> writes:
> > Alex> We'll try to keep it there barring special events that are announced
> > Alex> ahead of time.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Chris Thomson <Chri...@chris24.ca> wrote:
> Thanks so much guys. You all rock. 100 requests per hour? Hell, I > would've been fine with 50 requests, but 100? Wowzers. Unexpected, and > amazing.
> On Jul 9, 8:15 pm, "Alex Payne" <a...@twitter.com> wrote: >> Some of you have noticed that we've currently upped the allowed >> requests per hour to 100. We're still testing whether this rate works >> for us, but so far so good. We'll make a formal announcement once we >> know we can stick with it. At the very least, we won't be going back >> below 70.
>> This improvement is largely due to the work of Evan Weaver, a fairly >> recent addition to the Twitter team who you may have seen helping out >> around this group. He's awesome. If you like having 100 requests per >> hour, send him ponies.
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Terry Jones <terry.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> writes:
>> > Alex> We'll try to keep it there barring special events that are announced >> > Alex> ahead of time.
