Re: [twitter-dev] Digest for twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com - 11 Messages in 4 Topics

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Jonathan Timar

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:52:43 PM11/22/09
to twitter-deve...@googlegroups.com
Would somebody take me off this damn mailing list? When I got to the homepage to unsubscribe it says I can't because I am not currently a member. Well then why am I getting these emails? Make them stop please.

Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 3:26 PM
Subject: [twitter-dev] Digest for twitter-deve...@googlegroups.com - 11 Messages in 4 Topics

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/topics

    Chuck Blakeman <cfbla...@gmail.com> Nov 22 08:46AM -0700
     
    Unless I'm missing something here, this is the single worst (and only)
    degradation of service Twitter has ever put in place. A big step backwards
    for three reasons - 1) It completely ignores the concept of relationship
    building, 2) it promotes elitist arrogance on Twitter, and 3) it will
    increase meaningless RTs exponentially - What am I missing here on what's
    good about this?
     
    Ignoring Relationship Building
    People gravitate toward people they enjoy communicating with - that's how we
    build friends in any context. One of the main ways I find people I want to
    meet is that they like what I say, and more often than not, an RT tells me
    they like what I say, and I do the same for them. To keep me from being
    able to see people who like what I say removes one of the best ways of
    building relationships Twitter has. I NEED to see an RT from people who
    aren't following me to help me build my business.
     
    Elitist Arrrogance
    Being annoyed by people retweeting you is like an author being annoyed that
    people showed up at their book signing - how elitist to turn up your nose at
    people who like what you say. Gee, sorry about that. This mindset doesn't
    want to build relationships but just wants to be able to count how many
    faceless, nameless people RT them - how arrogant is that?
     
    Increased Meaningless RT Traffic
    Before this feature, you actually had to do a little work to RT - copy,
    paste, put RT in front of it and send. Ouch - that's a lot of work. But
    that tiny bit of work kept people from senselessly RT'ing just to gain
    followers - it was too cumbersome to use effectively for spamming. Now by
    the simple push of a button people will be RT'ing like changing TV channels
    w/ a remote, and you won't really know if it meant enough to them to put a
    little effort into building that relationship with you - just stop holding
    your finger up and let it fall - that really shows a how much that comment
    meant to you?
     
    Summary
    Twitter started out as a tool to build relationships. It has become less
    and less personal. This new RT'ing feature reduces your ability to build
    relationships, plays to the arrogant elite, and makes it easier for people
    to use RT'ing and 10 different ghost accounts to spam people to death. And
    this is an upgrade? Hmmm.... not seeing it. Facebook is starting to look
    good all of a sudden.
     
    CAN'T YOU MAKE IT A CHOICE TO SEE RTs FROM NON-FOLLOWERS? WHY SHOULD I
    SUFFER BECAUSE THE TWITTER ELITE ARE TIRED OF THEIR FOLLOWERS?

     

    Michael Ekstrand <mic...@elehack.net> Nov 22 10:14AM -0600
     
    Chuck Blakeman wrote:
    > and 3) it will increase meaningless RTs exponentially - What am I
    > missing here on what's good about this?
    Have you tried looking at the "Your tweets, retweeted" tab in the
    Retweets page on Twitter's web site?
     
    - Michael
     
    --
    mouse, n: A device for pointing at the xterm in which you want to type.
    Confused by the strange files? I cryptographically sign my messages.
    For more information see <http://www.elehack.net/resources/gpg>.
     
     

     

    chuckblakeman <cfbla...@gmail.com> Nov 22 09:24AM -0800
     
    I don't see any RTs in the "Your tweets, retweeted" tab from people
    WHO AREN'T FOLLOWING ME. I want to see those!
     
    Is there a way for me to see people who RT me who aren't following
    me? That's the biggest problem i see with this, and unless I can find
    those people, this whole "upgrade" ignores some basic fundamentals of
    building relationships.
     
    Imagine having people visit your blog and try to leave a comment that
    they agree with you and you're not allowed to see it. And this is an
    upgrade? Still not seeing any upgrade here.
     

     

    Duane Roelands <duane.r...@gmail.com> Nov 22 11:13AM -0800
     
    I believe the "Retweets Of Me" timeline is what you're looking for.
     

     

    chuckblakeman <cfbla...@gmail.com> Nov 22 11:44AM -0800
     
    I'm confusing you - I meant to say I want to see the RTs of people WHO
    DO NOT FOLLOW ME. How do I view those?
     
     

     

    Zac Bowling <zbow...@gmail.com> Nov 22 12:54PM -0800
     
    This a twitter developers list. Try twitter on getsatisfaction,com or
    http://help.twitter.com to contact twitter support.
     
    We are the last group to want to hear you scream about how horrible twitter
    is, and how it's hurting your user experience as an end user trying to game
    twitter to build your personal brand. Also as third party engineers we are
    all probably the last to care to be preached at about "twitter elitism".
     
    Zac Bowling
    @zbowling

     

    chuckblakeman <cfbla...@gmail.com> Nov 22 07:49AM -0800
     
    AT LEAST GIVE ME THE OPTION TO DECIDE FOR MYSELF IF I WANT TO SEE RTs
    FROM NON-FOLLOWERS!
     
    Unless I'm missing something here, this is the single worst (and only)
    degradation of service Twitter has ever put in place. A big step
    backwards for three reasons - 1) It completely ignores the concept of
    relationship building, 2) it promotes elitist arrogance on Twitter,
    and 3) it will increase meaningless RTs exponentially - What am I
    missing here on what's good about this?
     
    Ignoring Relationship Building
    People gravitate toward people they enjoy communicating with - that's
    how we build friends in any context. One of the main ways I find
    people I want to meet is that they like what I say, and more often
    than not, an RT tells me they like what I say, and I do the same for
    them. To keep me from being able to see people who like what I say
    removes one of the best ways of building relationships Twitter has. I
    NEED to see an RT from people who aren't following me to help me build
    my business.
     
    Elitist Arrogance
    Being annoyed by people retweeting you is like an author being annoyed
    that people showed up at their book signing - how elitist to turn up
    your nose at people who like what you say. Gee, sorry about that.
    This mindset doesn't want to build relationships but just wants to be
    able to count how many faceless, nameless people RT them - how
    arrogant is that?
     
    Increased Meaningless RT Traffic
    Before this feature, you actually had to do a little work to RT -
    copy, paste, put RT in front of it and send. Ouch - that's a lot of
    work. But that tiny bit of work kept people from senselessly RT'ing
    just to gain followers - it was too cumbersome to use effectively for
    spamming. Now by the simple push of a button people will be RT'ing
    like changing TV channels w/ a remote, and you won't really know if it
    meant enough to them to put a little effort into building that
    relationship with you - just stop holding your finger up and let it
    fall - that really shows a how much that comment meant to you?
     
    Summary
    Twitter started out as a tool to build relationships. It has become
    less and less personal. This new RT'ing feature reduces your ability
    to build relationships, plays to the arrogant elite, and makes it
    easier for people to use RT'ing and 10 different ghost accounts to
    spam people to death. And this is an upgrade? Hmmm.... not seeing
    it. Facebook is starting to look good all of a sudden.

     

    Duane Roelands <duane.r...@gmail.com> Nov 22 11:12AM -0800
     
    I lost tack of how many times you contradicted yourself, so I'll just
    point out the big one.
     
    "AT LEAST GIVE ME THE OPTION TO DECIDE FOR MYSELF IF I WANT TO SEE RTs
    FROM NON-FOLLOWERS!"
     
    ...and then...
     
    " I NEED to see an RT from people who aren't following me to help me
    build my business."
     
    You didn't have the option to filter retweets from non-followers
    before. This feature makes that possible for developers to give you
    that feature in client software. So, this feature makes it POSSIBLE
    to give you the feature you want when it wasn't possible before.
     
    Maybe you want this feature, maybe you don't. I can't tell from your
    ranting which you want or don't want. But, this change puts more
    control in the hands of developers and that's a good thing. You may
    or may not agree with that. You'll probably agree AND disagree in the
    same response.
     
     

     

    Julio Biason <julio....@gmail.com> Nov 23 06:26AM +1100
     
    > Ignoring Relationship Building
     
    Quite the contrary. If one of my friends retweets someone that I'm not
    following and it's interesting enough, I'll probably follow the
    original author. It's a way for your followers to show interesting
    thoughts and things that they thing THEIR followers will thing it's
    interesting enough to follow.
     
    > Elitist Arrogance
     
    As far as I know, you don't see when one of your followers retweets
    someone you posted.
     
    > Increased Meaningless RT Traffic
     
    'Cause all Twitter traffic is meaningful? It can be abused, yes. But
    EVERYTHING twitter provides in the form of APIs can be abused in a way
    or another. Mass following/unfollowing, by any chance?
     
    > Summary
     
    Summary: You don't understand twitter or the new retweet feature.
     
    --
    Julio Biason <julio....@gmail.com>
    Twitter: http://twitter.com/juliobiason

     

    JOHN OBRIEN <john....@twangu.com> Nov 22 11:51AM -0500
     
    Raffi - thanks for confirming that only type Point is being leveraged
    at this time... made my update to TwapperKeeper much easier this
    morning.
     
    Of course, I created a little technical baggage depending on when
    other types are leveraged.. but will cross that bridge when the time
    comes.
     
    Thanks again,
    John
    @jobrieniii
    http://twapperkeeper.com
     
    On Nov 21, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Raffi Krikorian wrote:
     

     

    Damdam <damien...@gmail.com> Nov 22 03:51AM -0800
     
    Hi there,
     
    I have an issue when trying to post a tweet from my server with my
    personal account (no problem with others). For example, from my
    Macbook, I tried :
     
    curl -u damdam:(password) -d status="" http://twitter.com/statuses/update.xml
     
    and I have a correct answer (no status).
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <hash>
    <request>/statuses/update.xml</request>
    <error>Client must provide a 'status' parameter with a value.</error>
    </hash>
     
    Good answer :-)
     
    Same curl from my sever, but not the same rely:
     
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <hash>
    <request>/statuses/update.xml</request>
    <error>Could not authenticate you.</error>
    </hash>
     
    Everything was right, but this happened after my account has been
    hacked (I changed the password, etc).
     
    Could you help me finding what's wrong (IP banned for one account ???)
     
    Thanks !
     
    Damien
    @damdam
     
    I'm the developer of boarding.fr (tweet #boarding along with your
    airport code) and eyetweet.net ;

     

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages