If you pass in a since_id, then do you get ALL the results since that
ID, or just the latest 20?
I'm planning to ping Twitter every minute and collect the @replies
sent to a particular user. I'm sure I won't get more than 20 @replies
per minute, but I would like to know if that's something I should note
for the future.
If you pass in a since_id, then do you get ALL the results since that ID, or just the latest 20?
I'm planning to ping Twitter every minute and collect the @replies sent to a particular user. I'm sure I won't get more than 20 @replies per minute, but I would like to know if that's something I should note for the future.
But didn't the since_id parameter return all tweets since that ID
originally? I have a Twitter client that I've coded which was working
fine with since_id till yesterday (December 1st). But since yesterday
it only returns the last 20 tweets. Was a functionality/API change
made?
On Dec 1, 6:38 pm, "Brian Gilham" <bgil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there are more than 20 results, you can use paging to grab them all.
There was a small change. They fixed a bug with since_id where it
would set it as 0 if the status had been deleted (#77). It looks like
they now require a count parameter as well.
--
Swap
On Dec 3, 1:12 pm, Fahim <fah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But didn't the since_id parameter return all tweets since that ID
> originally? I have a Twitter client that I've coded which was working
> fine with since_id till yesterday (December 1st). But since yesterday
> it only returns the last 20 tweets. Was a functionality/API change
> made?
> On Dec 1, 6:38 pm, "Brian Gilham" <bgil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If there are more than 20 results, you can use paging to grab them all.
On Dec 3, 11:39 am, Swap <RH.Swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was a small change. They fixed a bug with since_id where it
> would set it as 0 if the status had been deleted (#77). It looks like
> they now require a count parameter as well.
So what's a good workaround? Request the next page if you get 20
results? Too bad, but still doable :)
> On Dec 3, 11:39 am, Swap <RH.Swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There was a small change. They fixed a bug with since_id where it
> > would set it as 0 if the status had been deleted (#77). It looks like
> > they now require a count parameter as well.
> So what's a good workaround? Request the next page if you get 20
> results? Too bad, but still doable :)