Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
TVorNotTV
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Why CNN Should Be Bland (in the Right Places)
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mark Jeffries  
View profile  
 More options Aug 10 2012, 11:17 am
From: Mark Jeffries <spotligh...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Aug 10 2012 11:17 am
Subject: Why CNN Should Be Bland (in the Right Places)
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Andrew Tyndall makes a solid case that the pioneering cable channel's
future should be programming to the entire world on the Internet, not in
television--"CNN's future rival is *YouTube*, not Fox News" (not to mention
the BBC)--however, all of the attention seems to be on its domestic cable
ratings woes and its largely unsuccessful attempts to present a bland
version of FNC *and* MSNBC's programming:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cnn-future-anderson-cooper-pier...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tom Wolper  
View profile  
 More options Aug 10 2012, 1:58 pm
From: Tom Wolper <twol...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:58:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Why CNN Should Be Bland (in the Right Places)
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Mark Jeffries <spotligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrew Tyndall makes a solid case that the pioneering cable channel's future
> should be programming to the entire world on the Internet, not in
> television--"CNN's future rival is YouTube, not Fox News" (not to mention
> the BBC)--however, all of the attention seems to be on its domestic cable
> ratings woes and its largely unsuccessful attempts to present a bland
> version of FNC *and* MSNBC's programming:

> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cnn-future-anderson-cooper-pier...

I need to see some evidence that CNN execs think this way or even have
read this article before I conclude that CNN is not in long term
trouble.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google