Mobile has a problem probably (still) endemic to one extent or another throughout the nation: the lack of cooperation between stations and cable over 16:9 aspect ratio transmissions, which are now the norm in OTA TV post-digitalization. (I'm still waiting to see the whole picture from WFMZ out of Service Electric.)
That's interesting as in the UK most major providers have now decided that everyone has 16:9 and they put their logos and bugs right into the corners.
I'm not even sure that anyone is framing for anything except 16:9 either.
Adam
--
--
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvor...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tvornottv-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvornottv+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
I don't think you're missing much. It's been 10 years since 16:9 TVs started to become ubiquitous and most over-the-air TV (virtually everything in first-run syndication where I've paid attention and three out of the big four networks, with Fox as the exception) still seems to be framed with the assumption that it's being seen in center-cut 4:3 -- it's particularly noticeable with station/network logo bugs floating in the middle of nowhere way off the corner of a HD feed, all of the news/sports graphics that don't ever go to the edge of the screen, and wide shots where everyone is crammed into the middle part of the screen with nothing meaningful on the leftmost 22% or rightmost 22% of the screen.
--