Received: by 10.11.88.23 with SMTP id l23mr290766cwb;
        Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 220.139.141.215 by h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com with HTTP;
	Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:45:36 +0000 (UTC)
From:  "gasolin" <gaso...@gmail.com>
To:  "TurboGears" <turbogears@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: TurboGears vs Django
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:45:36 -0700
Message-ID: <1154241936.690585.92280@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <34bb7f5b0607292317k42841ac2x63ac18917c6a641e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1154156451.074135.316180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <34bb7f5b0607292317k42841ac2x63ac18917c6a641e@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-TW; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060719 Firefox/1.5.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

jo:

We don't know what's your background and purpose of your project.
So a bias suggestion may not fit your need.

You can follow Ian Mouer's IBM article for both django and turbogears.
He give's a good Conclusion for comparing TurboGears and Django

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-turbogears/#N10402


BTW: If you want to make an AJAX-enabled site, TurboGears is a good
choice.

--
fred