Received: by 10.35.21.1 with SMTP id y1mr1377843pyi;
        Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 59.92.94.130 by i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:31:10 +0000 (UTC)
From:  "Sanjay" <skpate...@gmail.com>
To:  "TurboGears" <turbogears@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: TurboGears vs JSP vs PHP vs Ruby on Rails vs Webware
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:31:10 -0700
Message-ID: <1155641470.461365.295680@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1155598673.324339.182090@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
References: <1155598673.324339.182090@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060313 Fedora/1.5.0.1-9 Firefox/1.5.0.1 pango-text,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

To me, SQLAlchemy (befitting for handling complex databases) support
seemed the greatest advantage of Turbogears.