Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
TurboGears
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion EVALUATION - TurboGears Persistency System
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Sylvain Hellegouarch  
View profile  
 More options Sep 2 2006, 1:53 pm
From: Sylvain Hellegouarch <s...@defuze.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:53:06 +0100
Local: Sat, Sep 2 2006 1:53 pm
Subject: Re: [TurboGears] Re: EVALUATION - TurboGears Persistency System
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Michele Cella a écrit :
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

>> I would like to evaluate TurboGears for use within a personal project
>> and was wondering which version to use best at this point.

>> The evaluation focuses initially on the persistence system and would
>> look somehow like this:

>> http://case.lazaridis.com/wiki/DjangoProductFictional

>> I don't like the used "Car" model, and would prefere to use a more
>> intuitive model.

>> Any suggestions are welcome.

> Sincerely, I suggest you evaluate this page:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilias_Lazaridis

> Ciao
> Michele

Pwned :D

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google