POLL: API docs engine?

Jorge Vargas

unread,

Jan 9, 2007, 10:54:51 PM1/9/07

to turbo...@googlegroups.com

Hi

sometime ago I was evaluating the different options but that got
sidetracked I'm planning on having this ready before the doc sprint,
in fact I want to do it tomorrow night.

Which python toolkit you prefer?

please just state the name
not to discourage discussion but we already have one at the docs list
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/turbogears-docs/browse_thread/thread/ccab25de8f35823e/c372891aac1b6fea?hl=en#c372891aac1b6fea

I prefer epydoc, is the one I choose back then

Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T

unread,

Jan 9, 2007, 11:37:37 PM1/9/07

to turbo...@googlegroups.com

+1 epydoc

Christopher Arndt

unread,

Jan 10, 2007, 6:54:37 AM1/10/07

to turbo...@googlegroups.com

Jorge Vargas schrieb:

> Which python toolkit you prefer?

+1 epydoc

-10 javadoc style docstrings

Joseph Tate

unread,

Jan 10, 2007, 9:52:25 AM1/10/07

to TurboGears

Christopher Arndt wrote:
> Jorge Vargas schrieb:
> > Which python toolkit you prefer?
>
> +1 epydoc

How do you handle decorated functions with epydoc? It seems to give
you the signature for the decorated function. We're trying to generate
XMLRPC docs and can't because of the expose decorator.

Jorge Godoy

unread,

Jan 10, 2007, 10:08:46 AM1/10/07

to turbo...@googlegroups.com

Christopher Arndt <chris...@web.de> writes:

I like docstrinfs with doxygen extensions.

--
Jorge Godoy <jgo...@gmail.com>

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward