Toolbox thoughts for IRC Chat

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ronald Jaramillo

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 2:33:19 PM11/14/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
This may be relevant for those of you planning to join the chat
tomorrow.
I'm not sure if we will be talking about Toolbox, but in case we are,
I made a couple of mock-up screens.
Check them out here:
http://www.checkandshare.com/catwalk/toolbox/

Cheers
Ronald

________________________________
Ronald Jaramillo
mail: ronald AT checkandshare DOT com
blog: http://www.checkandshare.com/blog



Elvelind Grandin

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 3:01:21 PM11/14/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com
ahh.. ohh... flashy icons... drools.
nice screens Ronald
--
cheers
elvelind grandin

Ronald Jaramillo

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 3:06:40 PM11/14/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com
Thanks =)
However the flashy icons are part of the Tango project (http://tango-project.org/Tango_Desktop_Project)
The have a set of guidelines for how icons they should look like for gnome apps, and this are samples 
from their library. Quite nice, indeed!
Ronald


Henriksvej 15

2400 København NV

+45 22 27 85 11

ron...@manoamano.dk


Elvelind Grandin

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 3:09:32 PM11/14/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com
But still. It's nice that when devs cares about looks too.
> Henriksvej 15
>
> 2400 København NV
>
> +45 22 27 85 11
>
> ron...@manoamano.dk
>



--
cheers
elvelind grandin

Ramon Hernandez

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 3:14:33 PM11/14/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com

On Nov 14, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Ronald Jaramillo wrote:
<snip>
> I made a couple of mock-up screens.
> Check them out here:
> http://www.checkandshare.com/catwalk/toolbox/
</snip>

*DROOL*
--Ray

Michele Cella

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 4:29:01 PM11/14/05
to TurboGears
Awesome work, as always.

Krys Wilken

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 5:07:41 PM11/14/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com
All I can say is... I want this!

Very nice!

Keep going this way and TG is gonna kick the snot out of Django and
Rails! (Maybe we can even take down the mighty Zope!) ;-P

Krys

bon...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 9:59:22 PM11/14/05
to TurboGears

Krys Wilken wrote:
> All I can say is... I want this!
>
> Very nice!
>
> Keep going this way and TG is gonna kick the snot out of Django and
> Rails! (Maybe we can even take down the mighty Zope!) ;-P
>
> Krys
Very pleasant looking indeed.

There is one thing I am wondering, is it true that we have a
proportationally higher percentage of Mac users/developers on TurboGear
which could be a contributing factor for the clean and pleasant
layout(say catwalk) ?

A feature request about catwalk:

Would it be possible to add a "generate model code" feature in catwalk
? For those who have their model definition all done in TurboGears,
this may sounds redundent but for people who use existing RDBMS(where
the definition is already done by some DBA), this can be handy.

I have an usage scenario that the app use centralized postgresql
database(thus the _fromdatabase in SQLObject is very hande) but I need
a shrinked portable version using SQLite(so the apps can be put on a
notebook for demo) which SQLObject doesn't have the _fromdatabase
feature. It ends up I still need to hand code all the columns
definitions for SQLObject class. Syncing between the centralized DB
definition and this becomes an issue.

Ronald Jaramillo

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 3:28:43 AM11/15/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

On Nov 15, 2005, at 3:59 AM, bon...@gmail.com wrote:


> Very pleasant looking indeed.

Thanks
>
> There is one thing I am wondering, is it true that we have a
> proportationally higher percentage of Mac users/developers on
> TurboGear
> which could be a contributing factor for the clean and pleasant
> layout(say catwalk) ?

On the Mac, ugly things stand up =).

> A feature request about catwalk:
>
> Would it be possible to add a "generate model code" feature in catwalk
> ? For those who have their model definition all done in TurboGears,
> this may sounds redundent but for people who use existing RDBMS(where
> the definition is already done by some DBA), this can be handy.
>
> I have an usage scenario that the app use centralized postgresql
> database(thus the _fromdatabase in SQLObject is very hande) but I need
> a shrinked portable version using SQLite(so the apps can be put on a
> notebook for demo) which SQLObject doesn't have the _fromdatabase
> feature. It ends up I still need to hand code all the columns
> definitions for SQLObject class. Syncing between the centralized DB
> definition and this becomes an issue.

I added a ticket for it (Ticket #124) , this issue will be covered
(inderectly) by version 2.0 of CatWalk.
The idea is that you will be able to design your model in CatWalk and
it will generate your model code.
Model code generation base on SQLObject classes, will cover your use
case as well.

Cheers.

Ronald Jaramillo

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 3:45:28 AM11/15/05
to turbo...@googlegroups.com
>
> On the Mac, ugly things stand up =).

I meant stand out, (no Slim Shaddy here)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages