Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Framework comparison
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Sean De La Torre  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Mar 1 2006, 3:31 pm
From: "Sean De La Torre" <sdelato...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:31:43 -0800
Local: Wed, Mar 1 2006 3:31 pm
Subject: Framework comparison

I thought you all would be interested in this framework comparison performed
by Sean Kelly, a NASA employee:

http://oodt.jpl.nasa.gov/better-web-app.mov

(Warning: the file is 400MB)

The following frameworks were compared:

J2EE
Rails
Zope
Turbo Gears
Django

TG did fairly well, though I suspect that he wasn't using the latest version
during his tests.

Sean


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Randall  
View profile  
 More options Mar 2 2006, 12:20 pm
From: "Randall" <rand...@tnr.cc>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:20:13 -0800
Local: Thurs, Mar 2 2006 12:20 pm
Subject: Re: Framework comparison
Yea, fastdata would have helped quite a bit on the last trial, but I
can't blame him for not using alpha features.  O.T. - I was amazed at
how fast this guy typed.  He makes good use of autocompletion, can
write a DTD from memory, and drum out 30 lines of code or html in about
10 seconds.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bill Woodward  
View profile  
 More options Mar 2 2006, 2:25 pm
From: "Bill Woodward" <wpw...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:25:57 -0600
Local: Thurs, Mar 2 2006 2:25 pm
Subject: Re: [TurboGears] Re: Framework comparison

On 3/2/06, Randall <rand...@tnr.cc> wrote:

> Yea, fastdata would have helped quite a bit on the last trial, but I
> can't blame him for not using alpha features.  O.T. - I was amazed at
> how fast this guy typed.  He makes good use of autocompletion, can
> write a DTD from memory, and drum out 30 lines of code or html in about
> 10 seconds.

Um, I think he had recorded that and was just talking over the playback.  At
least, that's the impression I got.  It was a very interesting
presentation.  I was surprised how well Zope/Plone rated, since I found them
very confusing.  I guess when I looked at them, I was looking for a CMS, not
a development framework.

OTOH, as a J2EE developer (in my day job), I was not at all surprised at how
J2EE rated.

- Bill

--
Bill Woodward     wpw...@saifa.net      http://www.saifa.net

"I have more trouble with D. L. Moody than with any other man I ever met."
-- D. L. Moody
        s/D. L. Moody/Bill Woodward/g


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gasolin  
View profile  
 More options Mar 3 2006, 12:13 am
From: "gasolin" <gaso...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:13:46 -0800
Local: Fri, Mar 3 2006 12:13 am
Subject: Re: Framework comparison
What a nice screencast,  after watching this I think it's time to do
some re-implementation with new turbogears elements.

In the morning,  I wake up and did it in an hour (including writing doc
and capture figures).I convinced that the whole iteration could be done
in 10 minutes(or less) to catch up with Sean Kelly's demo in latest tg
version through bunch of exciting new features in 0.9a  (Model
Designer, CatWalk, DataController...).

I'll release a doc in this weekend called "Making a Time Tracker in
TurboGears " to mention about tg on this screencast and my quick
re-implement with latest tg svn to show the difference.
In latest tg svn the interactive develop style remain, but in new tg
version we got more sleek tools to productivate ourself.

Good news, bad news. After this activity, I found the latest version
(in svn) is still buggy, here are some bugs I've meet under [windows]
environment:

* quickstart template generation tool not work properly(so I copy other
oldversion framework fromother project)
* Model Designer can't save generated code to model.py(so I copy to
model.py directly)
* Catwalk can't save new entry(so I use DataController to manuplate
data)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gasolin  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Mar 3 2006, 1:54 am
From: "gasolin" <gaso...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 22:54:16 -0800
Local: Fri, Mar 3 2006 1:54 am
Subject: Re: Framework comparison
You can see a snap comparism from Turbogears 0.8 / latest svn to
implement a simple time tracker here.

http://inet6.blogspot.com/2006/03/making-time-tracker-in-turbogears.html


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Schneider  
View profile  
 More options Mar 3 2006, 7:42 am
From: "Michael Schneider" <michaelschnei...@fuse.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 04:42:25 -0800
Local: Fri, Mar 3 2006 7:42 am
Subject: Re: Framework comparison
Thanks,

I have not heavily used 0.9 yet, and I am looking forward to you src
posting.

Mike


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gasolin  
View profile  
 More options Mar 5 2006, 10:18 am
From: "gasolin" <gaso...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:18:57 -0000
Local: Sun, Mar 5 2006 10:18 am
Subject: Re: Framework comparison
    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kevin Dangoor  
View profile  
 More options Mar 6 2006, 5:48 pm
From: "Kevin Dangoor" <dang...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:48:39 -0500
Local: Mon, Mar 6 2006 5:48 pm
Subject: Re: [TurboGears] Re: Framework comparison
On 3/3/06, gasolin <gaso...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks for doing that! 6 lines of Python code is quite an improvement.
(FastData really needs a lot of work, still... not to reduce below 6
lines of code, but to add better customizability and functionality.)

Usually, I use "alpha" to mean not feature complete. In the case of
0.9, I'm using the "alpha" label because it's buggier than what I'd
want to see in a beta.

Kevin


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google