The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: try...@googlecode.com
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:32:19 +0000
Local: Fri, Oct 26 2012 5:32 pm
Subject: Re: Comment on DunningModule in tryton
Comment by kantntre...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the feedback.
> I don't get the usage of dunning procedures?
Could you go into details about what is unclear?
> In account.dunning.level, what is the usage of level? The number of days
Agreed, that's redundant and will be removed.
> already give an order. > In account.dunning.level instead of text, I will use a link to the report
You mean a Many2One to "ir.action.report"?
> to use. > In account.dunning.dunning, why storing the dunning_level as it could be
Because it could be the case that the interval between two dunning runs is
> computed, idem for date. longer than the time between to dunning levels. For example if no dunning run is done for some time a receivable entry could be in the second dunning level according to the days since the maturity date but you nevertheless don't want to skip the first dunning level and politely remind the customer before ultimately threaten with legal measures. > I would prefer to not extend account.move.line and put all in the
But the dunning procedure to be applied to the receivable is a property of
> dunning lines. the move line itself. What would be the advantage of having an additional object mapping move lines to dunning procedures? For more information:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||