Received: by 10.216.193.131 with SMTP id k3mr17737wen.4.1349945467060;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: tryton@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.78.230 with SMTP id e6ls3435238wix.4.gmail; Thu, 11 Oct
 2012 01:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.107.167 with SMTP id hd7mr85177wib.0.1349945465838;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.107.167 with SMTP id hd7mr85175wib.0.1349945465827;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>
Received: from tesla.b2ck.com (tesla.b2ck.com. [94.23.57.34])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ci6si779322wib.3.2012.10.11.01.51.05
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cedric.kr...@b2ck.com designates 94.23.57.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=94.23.57.34;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cedric.kr...@b2ck.com designates 94.23.57.34 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Received: from b2ck.com (unknown [95.182.239.82])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: ced)
	by tesla.b2ck.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ADCB480050
	for <tryton@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:51:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:51:04 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>
To: tryton <tryton@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Account stock and production
Message-ID: <20121011085104.GB10861@tetsuo.ced.homedns.org>
Mail-Followup-To: tryton <tryton@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)


--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I'm working on https://bugs.tryton.org/issue2665
I would like to have comment about the behavior.
I don't know yet if it will be finished for the release but I think it
is an important missing feature for production.
Anyway, I will try to provide a patch that will work on 2.6.

Thanks,
--=20
C=C3=A9dric Krier

B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Li=C3=A8ge
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (OpenBSD)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQdoh3AAoJEDytP9RJlVYDrOwP/jyecI6J17Eeoiy4PVVZ8Y/x
9JZkpVTG3w7Azs8Pimtcf2It/3WA6nr2gr9nhV68dtWzci14SjfmJeFpY8gRohmE
CeltL8j4jSRij7n+W7Y0uDLqAUqyfnu5t+pThwTwrpCHOobe9OnhvcKupVWxfSYZ
ydpbPsxMJTzKIZ6m4N9VynKlnwXGiGfi0Y6KpzTa82Eo+X7v9Qq2EWfKnM8SFh2a
5/9SgUCrJVIU/OCWAI2ZUxCEKv+Or8trFQ30utXAPkPaZBmsqm6D3bOzAoR6Oqay
CechcXpT0YEvsVbtxbcK4APF+XI9B2pnsXvhXdKnMl/iwraeRzpGZNRmQm1F/Kr/
huApsDOkKIBHnvHk9P46HoHmdAUye2rqClcLccaPHjIn825lV1UN0k3PmcxtlP4R
Xsf54EsOvcR9JXE/EMHENftmbrNyDkDgH07nIXZkgzLCzLoEwHADqNNKFvhLL1JN
WL06BU8O4lH9pDSE/mW1rzVEFKbJQ32wmYzwNJ4zwdJm0GgsDNzGgZGVPSkQAHPK
Ns6KTKOt/mT8bKEeizrfnkLiYI4Z+RmfkVNwmkHvF+BYz2xPJkLOhGhgexaZ6rRl
q9PgCyIfApXa1znf5gRpD4n4yBPC8IGObMPTDrX5WeHoDMseBI0dIE1qk2vdghv2
VLA1NqFnp2gm5ChYD27u
=jAJ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv--