Received: by 10.224.108.202 with SMTP id g10mr17412854qap.8.1340834185191;
        Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: treetop-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.229.105.206 with SMTP id u14ls2122169qco.4.gmail; Wed, 27 Jun
 2012 14:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.31.135 with SMTP id y7mr9825267qac.5.1340834184514;
        Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.214.195 with SMTP id hb3msqab;
        Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.19.110 with SMTP id d14mr1562608vde.10.1340827346932;
        Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bernhard <bernhard.weic...@googlemail.com>
To: treetop-dev@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <3654fdfb-7659-4a05-a1b5-3d8c66014784@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <508ADFB80666488A9E42315172320963@gmail.com>
References: <5F8EED2E77A9475D99E84455E51402C2@gmail.com>
 <13275188.5892.1330490239658.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbed8>
 <1330495400.17809.9.camel@AVA-351181>
 <508ADFB80666488A9E42315172320963@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Parser trying to extend with a SyntaxNode subclass weirdness.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1805_16835513.1340827346168"

------=_Part_1805_16835513.1340827346168
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1806_23498337.1340827346168"

------=_Part_1806_23498337.1340827346168
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

One motivation to use subclasses is the approach 
in http://thingsaaronmade.com/blog/a-quick-intro-to-writing-a-parser-using-treetop.html.

It allows to clean the parse tree such that it only has the semantically 
relevant information and no longer keep the syntactical sugar.



Am Mittwoch, 29. Februar 2012 09:30:37 UTC+1 schrieb James Harton:
>
> Thanks folks for the feedback and explanation. I've switched over to 
> modules so at least it's stopped complaining about that.
> I've also wrapped the rules for interger_literal and literal in parens.
> I'm still a little confused about the fact that the parser still refuses 
> to recognise any of my patterns:
>
>
------=_Part_1806_23498337.1340827346168
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

One motivation to use subclasses is the approach in&nbsp;http://thingsaaronmade.com/blog/a-quick-intro-to-writing-a-parser-using-treetop.html.<div><br></div><div>It allows to clean the parse tree such that it only has the semantically relevant information and no longer keep the syntactical sugar.</div><div><br></div><div><br><br>Am Mittwoch, 29. Februar 2012 09:30:37 UTC+1 schrieb James Harton:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">
                <div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:13px">Thanks folks for the feedback and explanation. I've switched over to modules so at least it's stopped complaining about that.<div>I've also wrapped the rules for interger_literal and literal in parens.<br><div>I'm still a little confused about the fact that the parser still refuses to recognise any of my patterns:</div><div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
------=_Part_1806_23498337.1340827346168--

------=_Part_1805_16835513.1340827346168--