TREC-Relfeed

Hi all, Since track participant papers are due Monday (2/28), we'd hoped to be able to provide

On behalf of the organizers, I apologize for both the delay in responding, as well as the very

Submissions for the relevance feedback track are now closed. I have sent confirmation messages to all

Just a reminder that the TREC RF deadline is fast approaching. The deadline is officially midnight,

Chris <chrisa....@gmail.com> writes: > You should use the check_input script before

The input files and final guidelines have been added to the Google-groups relevance feedback site.

Thank you -taner 2010/6/5 Mark D. Smucker <msmu...@engmail.uwaterloo.ca>: > I've posted

Hi, The track organizers are working on the guidelines, and we are hoping to have them out within a

I am expecting the overview paper! On Nov 19, 9:53 am, Chris Buckley <chr...@sabir.com> wrote:

Jonathan, Ian just forwarded my evaluations files to you (I'm the one who's responsible for

Dear Chris, Just wonder if the relevance feedback track judgements would be available before the

If you sent runs for phase 2, you should receive an email from me confirming those runs. (Your

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Xiaohui(Daniel) Tao<dannybo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Hi folks, One of the questions left open in the TREC RF guidelines was whether we would allow two

NIST has put up the results from your Phase 1 runs that are to be used for Phase 2 input. You can

Judgments for Phase 1 TREC Relevance Feedback runs are being finished up at NIST and should be done

Phase 1 runs were due last night. I have sent an email confirmation to everyone that sent a run for

Hi Mark, I'm forwarding this response to the mailing list. For the Phase 1 submissions (now due

TREC Relevance Feedback participants: The assessor schedule at NIST has changed and we now have at

Apologies, I didn't actually mean to send this to the mailing list :-( > -----Original Message

Relevance Feedback (RF) track in TREC 2009 Guidelines May 21, 2009 Last year's TREC Relevance

Chris, hi, > Deadline is no earlier than June 15th; but I'm trying to push > it back a bit;

A few comments on Chris's "rough plan" sent out 27 March: I think the first-stage

The folks at CMU have set up a mailing list for discussion of the new ClueWeb09 collection, which is

I'm afraid those details aren't known yet. I am hopeful that these issues will be resolved

Dear sir/madam, I want to know when the guideline of the RF task will be released.And when the data

I've been asked, given the plethora of measures and evaluation techniques for the RF track,

I have just sent evaluation results to all participants in the relevance feedback track. If you don

I have sent confirmation emails to all groups that submitted runs to the relevance feedback track. If

Andrea <bernardi...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, i would like to use the script