new MN PRT bizdev approach: sue your prospective customer

[Steve Raney]

The large CC line maximizes the number of client-side Minnesotans that
are antagonized. I am not aware of an example of this bizdev approach
succeeding.

From: Bill James [mailto:bill....@jitcorp.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 3:11 PM
To: Sorel, Thomas (MnDOT)
Cc: Feit, Dennis (DOT); Ariene McCarthy (Met Council); Arseneau,
Bernie (DOT); David Pesch (Olmsted County); Eric Sorensen (Winona);
Ferrol Robinson (UMn); Gina Baas (UMn); Paulson, Greg (DOT); Meyer,
Jean M (DOT); Jeff Ellerbusch (Olmsted County); John Levin (Met
Council); Karl Keel (Bloomington); Buckeye, Kenneth (DOT); Gutknecht,
Kevin (DOT); Hernandez, Kristine J (DOT); Laurie McGinnis (UMn);
Marisol Simon (DOT); Schweyen, Michael (DOT); Michael Sheehan
(Olmsted); Schadauer, Michael (DOT); Thakur, Mukhtar (DOT); Succio,
Nelrae (DOT); Representative Tina Liebling; Senator Gen Olson;
Stephanie Malinoff (UMn); Henkel, Tim (DOT); Tony Knauer (Rochester);
Venkat.Pindiprolu - FTA;

Re: PRT in Minnesota (delayed) but not in China

Hi Tom

We have refined the summary of the 28th Amendment as a basis to end
government monopolies over power and transportation infrastructures.

We are preparing a citizen suit in which we will name you and the
State of Minnesota for blocking privately financed solar-powered
mobility networks. It would be much better if Minnesota will allow
such networks.

Unless you have some means to guaranteeing access to affordable
gasoline, as noted in the summary of the 28th Amendment, the decay of
the oil-powered economy seems likely to kill about 8 in 10 Americans
over the next 20 years. Geology is slow and relentless. We can
preempt the crisis by becoming self-reliant and ending our oil
addiction.

Please consider that if people die, the civil aspects of the citizens
suit should be expanded to criminal accountability. People are
already losing their homes because DOT mandates oil as the lifeblood
of our economy.

Thanks
Bill James